238:
major artists seems at least as significant as a flash-in-the-pan artist who charts once and then never records or tours again after that. The one-hit wonder is notable per WP:MUSIC by virtue of charting; in my opinion, this guy is probably just as significant to the music industry, maybe more so.
251:
based on lack of sources. If sources were provided, I think the artist is just notable enough to change to a weak keep, but only if at least one WP:RS compliant source is provided. To do otherwise sets a bad precedent; we have too much unsourced material already.
330:
article that does not assert or demonstrate notability. Aside of stating that the subject of the article heads an apparently nameless back-up band (how can someone be notable for heading a non-notable music group?), the article is empty.
303:
185:. One or two trivial changes have been made to the text but are not nearly enough; content is still at least 95%-98% identical which is plenty to constitute a copyright violation.
125:
348:, would not appear to be anything more than a garden variety session/backup musician. Was not able to find any significant reliable, independent sources about him.
153:
132:
Doesn't seem to be a notable musician, despite having backed dozens of notable musicians – there are no evident sources pertaining to his individual notability.
17:
92:
87:
96:
79:
214:
I had failed to recognize a previous version without the copyright material or I would not have suggested the speedy. (
368:
36:
367:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
352:
340:
318:
293:
272:
205:
169:
142:
61:
314:
230:
and strict interpretation of guidelines is not always for the best. I would be inclined to say that he
83:
160:
133:
57:
223:
215:
49:
253:
186:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
227:
336:
310:
289:
327:
244:
240:
226:
is interpreted strictly, then this artist doesn't quite seem to make the cut. However,
349:
239:
I would say: notable by a slight margin. The bigger issue, to me, is the lack of any
219:
75:
67:
53:
113:
332:
285:
234:
notable. I admit it's a grey area, but a whole career of supporting work with
243:. I did a quick check of Google and Google news and found nothing that meets
182:
247:, though I admit I did not look deeply. As it stands now, I would say
361:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
304:
list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions
120:
109:
105:
101:
181:, tagged as such. Page contents are copied from
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
371:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
154:list of Music-related deletion discussions
48:, consensus is that the article fails the
302:: This debate has been included in the
152:: This debate has been included in the
183:http://jimmynicholslive.com/about.html
222:is somewhat unclear on this one. If
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
228:Knowledge (XXG) is not a bureaucracy
218:.) Thus, the AfD is back on. The
284:Copyrighted material was removed.-
24:
1:
50:relevant notability guideline
388:
353:03:14, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
341:03:07, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
319:15:38, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
294:11:09, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
273:16:43, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
206:00:44, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
170:23:29, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
143:23:29, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
62:09:39, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
364:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
216:Slaps self with trout
321:
307:
177:G12 Speedy Delete
172:
167:
157:
140:
379:
366:
308:
298:
271:
267:
258:
204:
200:
191:
165:
163:
162:Ten Pound Hammer
158:
148:
138:
136:
135:Ten Pound Hammer
123:
117:
99:
44:The result was
34:
387:
386:
382:
381:
380:
378:
377:
376:
375:
369:deletion review
362:
269:
265:
263:
254:
202:
198:
196:
187:
161:
134:
119:
90:
74:
71:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
385:
383:
374:
373:
357:
356:
343:
322:
296:
278:
277:
276:
275:
261:
209:
208:
194:
173:
166:and his otters
139:and his otters
130:
129:
70:
65:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
384:
372:
370:
365:
359:
358:
354:
351:
347:
344:
342:
338:
334:
329:
326:
323:
320:
316:
312:
305:
301:
297:
295:
291:
287:
283:
280:
279:
274:
259:
257:
250:
246:
242:
237:
233:
229:
225:
221:
217:
213:
212:
211:
210:
207:
192:
190:
184:
180:
178:
174:
171:
164:
155:
151:
147:
146:
145:
144:
137:
127:
122:
115:
111:
107:
103:
98:
94:
89:
85:
81:
77:
76:Jimmy Nichols
73:
72:
69:
68:Jimmy Nichols
66:
64:
63:
59:
55:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
363:
360:
345:
328:one sentence
324:
299:
281:
256:OlenWhitaker
255:
248:
235:
231:
189:OlenWhitaker
188:
176:
175:
149:
131:
45:
43:
31:
28:
311:Fabrictramp
249:weak delete
241:references
220:notability
350:Lankiveil
224:WP:MUSIC
126:View log
54:Davewild
93:protect
88:history
346:Delete
333:B.Wind
325:Delete
286:Wafulz
260:• or
193:• or
121:delete
97:delete
46:Delete
262:don't
245:WP:RS
195:don't
124:) – (
114:views
106:watch
102:links
16:<
337:talk
315:talk
300:Note
290:talk
282:Note
264:• ♣
236:many
197:• ♣
150:Note
110:logs
84:talk
80:edit
58:talk
309:--
306:.
168:•
159:--
156:.
141:•
339:)
317:)
292:)
268:â™
232:is
201:â™
112:|
108:|
104:|
100:|
95:|
91:|
86:|
82:|
60:)
52:.
355:.
335:(
313:(
288:(
270:♦
266:♥
203:♦
199:♥
179:,
128:)
118:(
116:)
78:(
56:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.