266:
NuGet, PyPi, etc., and it seems to get a lot of mentions on sites like StackExchange. A lot of widely used FOSS tools suffer from the problem of being overlooked by magazines and books, unfortunately. So I don't know quite whether this should be deleted or not, and would be interested to hear from wiser editors than me, before deciding.
219:
As the initiator of the jsreport project, can I do something to avoid the deletion from wikipedia? I can't add an article to NYT, but maybe there is something else? I don't know all the rules, but it looks like to me that the project with massive use and 60 000 downloads in relatively small segment
265:
online, and zero Google News or Gbooks hits. But
Knowledge doesn't have official guidelines yet on software notability, mostly because it's so hard to come up with any general guidelines on which a broad cross-section of editors can agree. It seems to have pretty good support outside the project,
256:
wow! Your last edit was nearly three years ago, yet you responded here within minutes of this discussion going up. So I'm guessing that that you're pretty handy at web monitoring too. :) Anyway. This is a tricky one. Going strictly by
166:
119:
284:
160:
126:
17:
235:
92:
87:
181:
96:
148:
335:
306:
262:
420:
349:
79:
40:
396:
324:
142:
416:
36:
345:
292:
271:
223:
209:
138:
401:
384:
375:
353:
326:
296:
275:
239:
213:
174:
83:
61:
251:
227:
188:
317:
231:
75:
67:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
415:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
57:
288:
267:
198:
366:
154:
258:
113:
53:
220:
of reporting servers could have its place on wiki. Thank you for your time.
261:, the nominator is right, it doesn't have significant coverage in
409:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
363:. Cites no third-party sources, no indication of notability.
338:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
309:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
197:
I can't find any reliable sources about this software.
109:
105:
101:
173:
315:
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –
344:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
423:). No further edits should be made to this page.
383:as simply advertising based from our policies.
285:list of Software-related deletion discussions
187:
8:
283:Note: This debate has been included in the
282:
221:
7:
24:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
402:06:43, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
376:06:37, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
354:06:38, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
327:01:29, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
62:06:02, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
297:15:44, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
276:15:43, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
240:15:07, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
214:14:48, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
440:
412:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
263:WP: Reliable sources
374:
356:
329:
299:
242:
226:comment added by
431:
414:
399:
394:
373:
371:
364:
343:
341:
339:
320:
314:
312:
310:
255:
192:
191:
177:
129:
117:
99:
34:
439:
438:
434:
433:
432:
430:
429:
428:
427:
421:deletion review
410:
397:
385:
367:
365:
357:
346:Spirit of Eagle
334:
332:
330:
318:
305:
303:
249:
134:
125:
90:
74:
71:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
437:
435:
426:
425:
405:
404:
378:
342:
331:
313:
302:
301:
300:
279:
278:
243:
195:
194:
131:
70:
65:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
436:
424:
422:
418:
413:
407:
406:
403:
400:
395:
392:
388:
382:
379:
377:
372:
370:
362:
359:
358:
355:
351:
347:
340:
337:
328:
325:
322:
321:
311:
308:
298:
294:
290:
286:
281:
280:
277:
273:
269:
264:
260:
253:
247:
244:
241:
237:
233:
229:
225:
218:
217:
216:
215:
211:
207:
205:
201:
190:
186:
183:
180:
176:
172:
168:
165:
162:
159:
156:
153:
150:
147:
144:
140:
137:
136:Find sources:
132:
128:
124:
121:
115:
111:
107:
103:
98:
94:
89:
85:
81:
77:
73:
72:
69:
66:
64:
63:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
411:
408:
390:
386:
380:
368:
360:
333:
319:Juliancolton
316:
304:
245:
222:— Preceding
203:
199:
196:
184:
178:
170:
163:
157:
151:
145:
135:
122:
49:
47:
31:
28:
161:free images
369:Sandstein
289:Wikishovel
268:Wikishovel
417:talk page
37:talk page
419:or in a
336:Relisted
307:Relisted
236:contribs
224:unsigned
120:View log
76:Jsreport
68:Jsreport
39:or in a
361:Delete.
252:Pofider
246:Comment
228:Pofider
167:WP refs
155:scholar
93:protect
88:history
393:wister
389:wister
381:Delete
259:WP:GNG
139:Google
97:delete
54:Kurykh
50:delete
206:alton
182:JSTOR
143:books
127:Stats
114:views
106:watch
102:links
16:<
398:talk
350:talk
293:talk
272:talk
232:talk
210:talk
175:FENS
149:news
110:logs
84:talk
80:edit
58:talk
202:am
189:TWL
118:– (
52:.
352:)
323:|
295:)
287:.
274:)
248:-
238:)
234:•
212:)
169:)
112:|
108:|
104:|
100:|
95:|
91:|
86:|
82:|
60:)
391:T
387:S
348:(
291:(
270:(
254::
250:@
230:(
208:(
204:W
200:S
193:)
185:·
179:·
171:·
164:·
158:·
152:·
146:·
141:(
133:(
130:)
123:·
116:)
78:(
56:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.