409:
about different transactions, so I call this a passing mention. Same for this one from Our Sports
Central: "Juan Richardson followed with a double to put runners at second and third."... "The Naturals added the go-ahead run in the fifth, when Juan Richardson hit a bomb to left." These two sentences are the sum total about Richardson in the article. Again, I see this as a passing mention.--
408:
I looked through a random sampling of these gnews hits before nominating this one. Typical of the hits is this ESPN hit: "November 21, 2002 Purchased the contracts of pitchers Ryan Madson, Franklin Perez and Jeremy Wedel, third basemen Juan
Richardson and Chase Utley." The line before and after are
437:
agreed to back off when those who feel that the minor leagues are beneath their lofty WikiProject agreed to allow minor league all-stars. If these compromises are no longer in place I see no reason why I and others shouldn't start adding dozens of new minor league articles each and every day.
387:
Minor league players often get a lot Gnews hits because of brief mentions in articles about individual games or minor league teams. If you can demonstrate that a couple of those articles provide signitificant, in-depth coverage of this guy, I'd be willing to change my vote to "keep."
464:) that notability for minor league players should be based on significant coverage in reliable sources (that is, Knowledge (XXG)'s general notability guideline). If you disagree with this criterion, you're of course welcome to reopen the discussion there.
369:, he has about 200 "mentions" (not sure what they all are) in Google news under ""Juan Richardson" +baseball". I'm sure there must be sources in spanish somewhere as well as this guy is from the Dominican Republic.
461:
457:
191:
136:
222:
in one of the major leagues outlined in the proposed (but not fully adopted) baseball notability guidelines, and that minor league players are not notable unless there has been
120:
433:- It was my understanding that minor league all-stars were notable per compromises made this past year. Those of us who feel that all minor league players are notable per
162:
127:
Minor league baseball player who has only made it to AA level. Good faith gsearch and gnews search only coming up with passing mentions and stat pages in the
340:- Statistics or brief mentions in articles about minor league teams do not constitute "significant coverage in reliable sources," as required by
218:
There is broad interpretation among
Knowledge (XXG) editors of what constitutes "fully professional" for baseball players, I interpret as having
87:
82:
91:
286:, other minor leaguers are typically deleted for the reasons presented by the nom and by Kelapstick; why treat him any differently?
17:
74:
490:
36:
489:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
309:
271:
256:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
473:
447:
443:
421:
397:
378:
353:
332:
314:
295:
276:
260:
243:
226:
coverage of them in reliable, independent sources (not just statistic pages), in which case they would pass
209:
180:
151:
56:
78:
416:
204:
175:
146:
239:
70:
62:
434:
362:
231:
132:
305:
267:
252:
439:
374:
366:
291:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
410:
198:
169:
140:
227:
235:
128:
469:
393:
349:
323:
341:
370:
131:. So notability will come down to whether AA is "fully professional", as required by
322:. He's been fluctuating in and out of AA, I don't see him making it to the majors.
287:
50:
108:
456:
Please calm down. I think you may be misremembering last year's discussion at
465:
389:
345:
139:
says not, but while this did have much consensus, it is just a draft.)
483:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
458:
Knowledge (XXG) talk:WikiProject
Baseball/Notability guidelines
137:
Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject
Baseball/Notability guidelines
115:
104:
100:
96:
460:, which reached a consensus (reflected in the revised
192:list of Living people-related deletion discussions
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
493:). No further edits should be made to this page.
163:list of Baseball-related deletion discussions
8:
186:
157:
190:: This debate has been included in the
161:: This debate has been included in the
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
228:the general notability guidelines
303:and reasoning of Kelapstick. -
1:
129:independent reliable sources
230:and would not have to pass
510:
474:02:50, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
448:23:37, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
422:15:53, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
398:14:35, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
379:08:55, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
365:, Knowledge (XXG) is not
354:04:17, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
333:00:06, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
315:16:18, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
296:14:21, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
277:16:18, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
261:03:09, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
244:02:57, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
210:00:26, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
181:00:24, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
152:00:23, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
57:04:40, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
486:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
462:notability guidelines
44:The result was
212:
195:
183:
166:
501:
488:
419:
413:
330:
313:
275:
207:
201:
196:
178:
172:
167:
149:
143:
135:. (The proposed
118:
112:
94:
53:
34:
509:
508:
504:
503:
502:
500:
499:
498:
497:
491:deletion review
484:
417:
411:
324:
312:
306:CobaltBlueTony™
304:
274:
268:CobaltBlueTony™
266:
205:
199:
176:
170:
147:
141:
114:
85:
71:Juan Richardson
69:
66:
63:Juan Richardson
51:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
507:
505:
496:
495:
479:
478:
477:
476:
451:
450:
427:
426:
425:
424:
403:
402:
401:
400:
382:
381:
356:
335:
317:
308:
301:Delete per nom
298:
281:
280:
279:
270:
253:Mr Accountable
246:
213:
184:
125:
124:
65:
60:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
506:
494:
492:
487:
481:
480:
475:
471:
467:
463:
459:
455:
454:
453:
452:
449:
445:
441:
440:Kinston eagle
436:
432:
429:
428:
423:
420:
414:
407:
406:
405:
404:
399:
395:
391:
386:
385:
384:
383:
380:
376:
372:
368:
364:
360:
357:
355:
351:
347:
343:
339:
336:
334:
331:
329:
328:
321:
318:
316:
311:
307:
302:
299:
297:
293:
289:
285:
282:
278:
273:
269:
264:
263:
262:
258:
254:
250:
247:
245:
241:
237:
233:
229:
225:
221:
217:
214:
211:
208:
202:
193:
189:
185:
182:
179:
173:
164:
160:
156:
155:
154:
153:
150:
144:
138:
134:
130:
122:
117:
110:
106:
102:
98:
93:
89:
84:
80:
76:
72:
68:
67:
64:
61:
59:
58:
55:
54:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
485:
482:
430:
361:- He passes
358:
337:
326:
325:
319:
300:
283:
248:
223:
219:
215:
187:
158:
126:
49:
45:
43:
31:
28:
412:Fabrictramp
224:significant
200:Fabrictramp
171:Fabrictramp
142:Fabrictramp
435:WP:ATHLETE
418:talk to me
363:WP:ATHLETE
236:kelapstick
232:WP:ATHLETE
206:talk to me
177:talk to me
148:talk to me
133:WP:ATHLETE
327:Wizardman
371:Borgarde
121:View log
288:Nyttend
265:Why? -
88:protect
83:history
52:MBisanz
338:Delete
320:Delete
284:Delete
220:played
216:Delete
116:delete
92:delete
46:delete
367:paper
119:) – (
109:views
101:watch
97:links
16:<
470:talk
466:BRMo
444:talk
431:Keep
394:talk
390:BRMo
375:talk
359:Keep
350:talk
346:BRMo
342:WP:N
310:talk
292:talk
272:talk
257:talk
249:Keep
240:talk
188:Note
159:Note
105:logs
79:talk
75:edit
234:.--
197:--
168:--
472:)
446:)
415:|
396:)
377:)
352:)
344:.
294:)
259:)
251:--
242:)
203:|
194:.
174:|
165:.
145:|
107:|
103:|
99:|
95:|
90:|
86:|
81:|
77:|
48:.
468:(
442:(
392:(
373:(
348:(
290:(
255:(
238:(
123:)
113:(
111:)
73:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.