500:– Understand the rational, and you are right, there are an infinite amount of exoplanets and as such, we here at Knowledge (XXG), could have an infinite amount of articles addressing each. However, at this time, what we have is a list of specific exoplanets, that this particular one is listed in and which has been confirmed and verified by both secondary and third party reliable sources, and as such becomes notable. And again address the area that there is information about this “rock” . A blue link to the limited amount of information we have on the subject is well within our guidelines and as such believe should be kept. Thanks for listening.
300:. At the moment, the sole reference is essentially an entry in a list. Which is where this belongs. We don't need a separate article for every exoplanet discovered, only for the ones which feature something extraordinary that has resulted in significant coverage. Until more information becomes available about this exoplanet, or something about it is found to be extraordinary, it belongs as an entry in a list and no more.
478:
While I see the argument that there are many exoplanets on wikipedia, (and lists of them) the ones I looked at still had good enough RS to substantiate an article. Clearly if there are bajillions of exoplanets, and many not of note, then we don't need pages for all of them.... they can sit on a list
269:
listed have a blue link to a small article giving a brief informative description of the subject, how it was discovered, and other facts associated with the subject. I appreciate that a vast majority of these individual articles will never progress pass this level in the near future, due to
208:
but has not been improved. References to this planet are only found in a single paper detailing a large list of new exoplanets found in the K2 survey. It is also included in the standard exoplanet databases. I found no other references, technical or popular.
420:
I'll comment that when I looked for what might reference this page (assuming it was only referenced by the lists it would be redirected to), I got an absurdly long list of articles which didn't obviously relate to that exoplanet. It's been added to
363:
or with significant bias or factual issues. I'd rather keep this based on good faith on the authors' parts. At a more subjective level, I found the article mildly interesting and would assume others would as well.
169:
270:
technology limitations, however, that does not mean the article will stay in its current state perpetually. As our technology advances in viewing space so will our knowledge with regards to individual
254:
122:
226:
163:
249:- I understand the premise for the AFD and was on the verge of expressing an opinion to delete. However, in researching the article I came across a
274:
and at that time the articles can be expanded. In the meantime I see nothing wrong with having a short informative piece about an individual
381:. I don't think the refs support notability, there are two which look like scientific papers from which the data in this article is deduced.
262:
258:
129:
17:
431:, so we get all sorts of unrelated articles pointing to this. If we do redirect it, we should remove it from that template.
537:
455:
559:
40:
184:
95:
90:
151:
99:
399:
369:
234:
484:
82:
322:
I'll be somewhat more explicit. Is there anything in the article that is not present on the single line in
425:
145:
555:
407:
36:
365:
230:
214:
141:
502:
480:
280:
177:
542:
514:
488:
468:
444:
411:
390:
373:
339:
313:
292:
238:
218:
201:
86:
64:
359:
without problems. I agree that notability is borderline, but this is not a topic that falls into
250:
323:
191:
532:
438:
333:
307:
275:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
554:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
78:
70:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
403:
360:
205:
386:
210:
352:
55:
356:
157:
527:
465:
432:
327:
301:
116:
265:
and so on and so on. In reviewing the “Lists” I noticed that a majority of the
382:
271:
266:
398:: I don't see much in this article that can't be covered by a list such as
550:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
458:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
112:
108:
104:
176:
464:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
190:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
562:). No further edits should be made to this page.
225:Note: This discussion has been included in the
255:List of exoplanets discovered between 2000–2009
227:list of Astronomy-related deletion discussions
8:
224:
204:. Article is tagged as possibly failing
52:. A redirect can be created separately.
263:List of exoplanets discovered in 2011
259:List of exoplanets discovered in 2010
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
326:? If not, why have an article?
1:
526:Agree with Deathlibrarian.
579:
543:16:01, 30 March 2018 (UTC)
515:17:30, 30 March 2018 (UTC)
489:07:38, 26 March 2018 (UTC)
469:22:13, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
445:00:45, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
412:22:02, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
391:16:29, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
374:03:56, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
340:16:47, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
314:02:52, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
293:13:31, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
239:11:34, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
219:11:21, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
65:10:04, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
400:List of exoplanets (full)
552:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
251:List of exoplanets
471:
276:extrasolar planet
241:
63:
570:
540:
535:
530:
513:
463:
461:
459:
441:
430:
424:
336:
310:
291:
195:
194:
180:
132:
120:
102:
62:
60:
53:
34:
578:
577:
573:
572:
571:
569:
568:
567:
566:
560:deletion review
538:
533:
528:
501:
472:
454:
452:
439:
428:
422:
366:Fiftytwo thirty
334:
308:
279:
231:The Mighty Glen
137:
128:
93:
77:
74:
56:
54:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
576:
574:
565:
564:
546:
545:
520:
519:
518:
517:
492:
491:
481:Deathlibrarian
462:
451:
450:
449:
448:
447:
415:
414:
393:
376:
345:
344:
343:
342:
317:
316:
295:
243:
242:
198:
197:
134:
73:
68:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
575:
563:
561:
557:
553:
548:
547:
544:
541:
536:
531:
525:
522:
521:
516:
512:
511:
508:
505:
499:
496:
495:
494:
493:
490:
486:
482:
477:
474:
473:
470:
467:
460:
457:
446:
442:
436:
435:
427:
426:2018 in space
419:
418:
417:
416:
413:
409:
405:
401:
397:
394:
392:
388:
384:
380:
377:
375:
371:
367:
362:
358:
354:
350:
347:
346:
341:
337:
331:
330:
325:
321:
320:
319:
318:
315:
311:
305:
304:
299:
296:
294:
290:
289:
286:
283:
277:
273:
268:
264:
260:
256:
252:
248:
245:
244:
240:
236:
232:
228:
223:
222:
221:
220:
216:
212:
207:
203:
193:
189:
186:
183:
179:
175:
171:
168:
165:
162:
159:
156:
153:
150:
147:
143:
140:
139:Find sources:
135:
131:
127:
124:
118:
114:
110:
106:
101:
97:
92:
88:
84:
80:
76:
75:
72:
69:
67:
66:
61:
59:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
551:
549:
523:
509:
506:
503:
497:
475:
453:
433:
395:
378:
348:
328:
302:
297:
287:
284:
281:
246:
199:
187:
181:
173:
166:
160:
154:
148:
138:
125:
57:
49:
47:
31:
28:
534:Consermonor
404:Praemonitus
164:free images
272:exoplanets
267:Exoplanets
211:Lithopsian
58:Sandstein
556:talk page
539:Opus meum
349:Weak Keep
324:this list
202:WP:NASTRO
37:talk page
558:or in a
456:Relisted
396:Redirect
123:View log
39:or in a
529:Iazyges
498:Comment
466:Spartaz
440:discuss
434:Tarl N.
335:discuss
329:Tarl N.
309:discuss
303:Tarl N.
170:WP refs
158:scholar
96:protect
91:history
79:K2-157b
71:K2-157b
524:Delete
507:hoesss
479:page.
476:Delete
379:Delete
361:WP:NOT
351:meets
298:Delete
285:hoesss
206:WP:GNG
200:Fails
142:Google
100:delete
50:delete
383:Szzuk
353:WP:RS
185:JSTOR
146:books
130:Stats
117:views
109:watch
105:links
16:<
485:talk
408:talk
387:talk
370:talk
357:WP:V
355:and
247:Keep
235:talk
215:talk
178:FENS
152:news
113:logs
87:talk
83:edit
192:TWL
121:– (
487:)
443:)
429:}}
423:{{
410:)
402:.
389:)
372:)
364:--
338:)
312:)
278:.
261:,
257:,
253:,
237:)
229:.
217:)
172:)
115:|
111:|
107:|
103:|
98:|
94:|
89:|
85:|
510:S
504:S
483:(
437:(
406:(
385:(
368:(
332:(
306:(
288:S
282:S
233:(
213:(
196:)
188:·
182:·
174:·
167:·
161:·
155:·
149:·
144:(
136:(
133:)
126:·
119:)
81:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.