267:, so I'm not going to argue that this company is notable or should be kept. I think, though, that style issues such as "advertisement" aren't in themselves reason to delete, and that they shouldn't be used as arguments in favor of deletion. --
148:
A small company like millions of others that doesn't stand out for anything in particular, and doesn't appear in the news. Noy even the article says why this finance company is notable (apart from going bankrupt).
125:
239:
180:
advertising it! :-) Had a quick hunt through a variety of news sources, and found nothing to indicate why the company would be notable. -- JediLofty
17:
217:
92:
87:
96:
325:
36:
79:
324:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
263:. All that I can find is the administrator's announcement of a meeting of creditors which appeared in the
250:
310:
293:
276:
254:
229:
198:
181:
168:
139:
61:
289:
83:
132:
Advertisement for a financial company. I don't think the notability is established in the article.
306:
272:
211:
159:
57:
75:
67:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
49:
246:
194:
285:
177:
133:
264:
225:
302:
268:
207:
150:
53:
113:
190:
301:
I actually created this article. As it happens, the company is now bankrupt.
221:
318:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
120:
109:
105:
101:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
328:). No further edits should be made to this page.
240:list of Business-related deletion discussions
8:
238:: This debate has been included in the
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
176:as an advert. Doesn't even have
206:per good rationale outlined by
1:
284:As per earlier observations.
50:relevant notability guideline
345:
294:13:15, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
277:06:49, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
255:23:15, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
230:18:05, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
199:16:05, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
182:14:18, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
169:14:13, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
140:13:40, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
321:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
311:18:12, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
62:19:55, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
48:, article fails the
189:per nomination. -
257:
243:
166:
137:
336:
323:
244:
234:
165:
160:
156:
135:
123:
117:
99:
44:The result was
34:
344:
343:
339:
338:
337:
335:
334:
333:
332:
326:deletion review
319:
191:Smerdis of Tlön
178:Carol Vorderman
161:
152:
119:
90:
74:
71:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
342:
340:
331:
330:
314:
313:
296:
279:
265:London Gazette
258:
232:
201:
184:
171:
130:
129:
70:
65:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
341:
329:
327:
322:
316:
315:
312:
308:
304:
300:
297:
295:
291:
287:
283:
280:
278:
274:
270:
266:
262:
259:
256:
252:
248:
241:
237:
233:
231:
227:
223:
219:
216:
213:
209:
205:
202:
200:
196:
192:
188:
185:
183:
179:
175:
172:
170:
167:
164:
158:
157:
155:
147:
144:
143:
142:
141:
138:
127:
122:
115:
111:
107:
103:
98:
94:
89:
85:
81:
77:
73:
72:
69:
66:
64:
63:
59:
55:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
320:
317:
298:
281:
260:
235:
214:
203:
186:
173:
162:
153:
151:
145:
131:
45:
43:
31:
28:
247:Fabrictramp
286:Ecoleetage
76:OK Finance
68:OK Finance
303:JFBurton
269:Eastmain
218:contribs
208:Cambrasa
154:Cambrasa
126:View log
54:Davewild
261:Comment
134:Damiens
93:protect
88:history
299:Delete
282:Delete
204:Delete
187:Delete
174:Delete
163:confab
146:Delete
121:delete
97:delete
46:Delete
124:) – (
114:views
106:watch
102:links
16:<
307:talk
290:talk
273:talk
251:talk
236:Note
226:talk
222:Cirt
220:).
212:talk
195:talk
110:logs
84:talk
80:edit
58:talk
245:--
242:.
136:.rf
309:)
292:)
275:)
253:)
228:)
197:)
112:|
108:|
104:|
100:|
95:|
91:|
86:|
82:|
60:)
52:.
305:(
288:(
271:(
249:(
224:(
215:·
210:(
193:(
128:)
118:(
116:)
78:(
56:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.