Knowledge (XXG)

:Articles for deletion/O RLY? (4th nomination) - Knowledge (XXG)

Source 📝

252:. The Toronto Star is a big newspaper in Toronto, with higher circulation (but less prestige) than The Globe and Mail. CRN Australia is or was Computer Reseller News, a magazine for computer dealers. Both are reliable sources, and the mentions are more than trivial. And student newspapers are also usually reliable sources, in my experience. 462:
article relies on Knowledge (XXG) as its source for O RLY? - using that source would be fact laundering. This meme has received enough attention to pass notability guidelines, and the facts are verified well enough, so I don't see that our readers will be served by deleting this article.
553:. Of course the article's cause would be bolstered if any of the citations from the abovementioned reliable sources were actually inserted into the article as the ones that are actually there really don't bolster its suitability for Knowledge (XXG). 377:. Ten Pound Hammer already tried to get this deleted in 2008. You really must improve your searching for sources (try to see past the red mist), all these include at least mention of the meme and often more: 189: 89: 84: 79: 331:; the actual macro merits only a single sentence. Student newspapers cannot be used as blanket reliable sources, especially as they have looser editorial standards than larger organizations. 570:. The article had been edited and sources added. Every sentence in the article is now reliably sourced. It may also be worth noting that at least one major media organization ( 144: 347: 183: 149: 710:, O RLY is easily recognizable as such and would serve as a good descriptor for the image macro article, but doesn't necessarily deserve its own article. 74: 404: 532:
could be added I guess, but it's little more than a DICDEF with seemingly little possibility of expansion. Could possibly be merged elsewhere.
610: 537: 281: 581:
which has been published by several media organizations also uses this article as a source for the 2003 appearance date of "O RLY?" --
17: 605:
I think when a major media organization cites WP they cease thenceforth to be a RS, but yeah the article is in a better state now.
606: 533: 277: 238:. IF YOU KNOW THERE ARE SOURCES, ADD THEM. (Note: I removed an example farm, the sources for which were primary or unreliable.) 220:
Our sources: 1. A trivial mention in a 4chan article. 2. Forum post. 3. Forum post. 4. 4chan search. 5 and 6. Trivial mentions.
373:. What is it with this mania with trying to delete obviously well-known internet memes? At least find a merge target, such as 262: 719: 698: 677: 656: 639: 614: 596: 562: 541: 512: 498: 477: 453: 433: 419: 362: 337: 307: 285: 267: 243: 57: 472: 414: 734: 204: 36: 117: 112: 171: 121: 733:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
104: 35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
715: 464: 406: 235: 165: 384: 711: 673: 161: 441: 692: 197: 392: 685:-- this was a fair nomination but I believe it is now moot since the article has been adjusted. 591: 258: 53: 386: 211: 378: 652: 494: 358: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
390: 669: 635: 558: 458:
I've added three sources. I think that adding any more would just be reference bombing. The
449: 332: 665: 575: 388: 303: 578: 380: 276:"And student newspapers are also usually reliable sources, in my experience." O RLY? :-D 668:, article has been improved to wiki standards, with notability proven without question. 382: 686: 177: 582: 254: 49: 630:. The topic is fully covered there, in so far as significant coverage is lacking. -- 394: 648: 490: 354: 108: 138: 707: 631: 627: 571: 554: 445: 374: 397: 299: 550: 401: 100: 63: 323:, of which the coverage of this is a comparatively minor aspect. The 320: 549:
as there are reliable sources that have commented on the use of the
234:
secondary source that mentions this. Prove me wrong; don't just say
444:
is not a valid argument for either keeping or deleting an article.
727:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
315:. Trivial mentions in the reliable sources mentioned above; the 403:
It's been described as a "notable example" of the image macro:
574:) has cited this article in one of their articles on memes 577:; I've put the {onlinesource} tag on the talk page. The 134: 130: 126: 526:
Mo' Urban Dictionary: Ridonkulous Street Slang Defined
196: 210: 298:, this is almost as prevalent as LOL. YA RLY. -- 647:- well-sourced and notable per above discussion. 39:). No further edits should be made to this page. 737:). No further edits should be made to this page. 530:Game Addiction: The Experience and the Effects 348:list of Internet-related deletion discussions 90:Articles for deletion/O RLY? (4th nomination) 85:Articles for deletion/O RLY? (3rd nomination) 80:Articles for deletion/O RLY? (2nd nomination) 8: 342: 346:: This debate has been included in the 72: 524:I agree the sources are pretty weak. 18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion 7: 440:While it is a positive suggestion, 70: 489:Adequate sourcing seems to exist. 24: 223:Tiger Weekly: Student newspaper. 511:, his otters and a clue-bat • 432:, his otters and a clue-bat • 242:, his otters and a clue-bat • 1: 396:For internet culture, isn't 75:Articles for deletion/O RLY? 754: 720:04:19, 11 March 2010 (UTC) 58:17:20, 12 March 2010 (UTC) 699:07:21, 9 March 2010 (UTC) 678:20:14, 8 March 2010 (UTC) 657:03:58, 8 March 2010 (UTC) 640:17:05, 7 March 2010 (UTC) 615:15:57, 7 March 2010 (UTC) 597:09:20, 7 March 2010 (UTC) 563:05:11, 7 March 2010 (UTC) 542:03:47, 7 March 2010 (UTC) 513:03:41, 7 March 2010 (UTC) 499:02:45, 7 March 2010 (UTC) 478:14:48, 7 March 2010 (UTC) 454:05:11, 7 March 2010 (UTC) 434:03:41, 7 March 2010 (UTC) 420:21:25, 6 March 2010 (UTC) 363:19:52, 6 March 2010 (UTC) 338:01:21, 6 March 2010 (UTC) 334:Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs 308:01:07, 6 March 2010 (UTC) 286:03:48, 7 March 2010 (UTC) 268:00:14, 6 March 2010 (UTC) 244:19:36, 5 March 2010 (UTC) 730:Please do not modify it. 230:? I can't find a single 32:Please do not modify it. 579:Internet meme timeline 69:AfDs for this article: 327:article is about the 226:And this is notable 628:Image macro#Formats 400:perfectly reliable? 44:The result was 365: 351: 745: 732: 695: 689: 594: 589: 510: 509:Ten Pound Hammer 475: 471: 467: 431: 430:Ten Pound Hammer 417: 413: 409: 352: 335: 266: 241: 240:Ten Pound Hammer 215: 214: 200: 152: 142: 124: 34: 753: 752: 748: 747: 746: 744: 743: 742: 741: 735:deletion review 728: 693: 687: 592: 583: 508: 473: 469: 465: 429: 415: 411: 407: 333: 319:paper is about 253: 239: 157: 148: 115: 99: 96: 94: 67: 37:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 751: 749: 740: 739: 723: 722: 701: 680: 659: 642: 620: 619: 618: 617: 600: 599: 565: 544: 518: 517: 516: 515: 502: 501: 483: 482: 481: 480: 456: 437: 436: 423: 422: 367: 366: 340: 310: 291: 290: 289: 288: 271: 270: 218: 217: 154: 150:AfD statistics 95: 93: 92: 87: 82: 77: 71: 68: 66: 61: 42: 41: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 750: 738: 736: 731: 725: 724: 721: 717: 713: 712:Toad of Steel 709: 705: 702: 700: 696: 690: 684: 681: 679: 675: 671: 667: 663: 660: 658: 654: 650: 646: 643: 641: 637: 633: 629: 625: 622: 621: 616: 612: 608: 604: 603: 602: 601: 598: 595: 590: 588: 587: 580: 576: 573: 569: 566: 564: 560: 556: 552: 548: 545: 543: 539: 535: 531: 527: 523: 520: 519: 514: 506: 505: 504: 503: 500: 496: 492: 488: 485: 484: 479: 476: 468: 461: 457: 455: 451: 447: 443: 439: 438: 435: 427: 426: 425: 424: 421: 418: 410: 405: 402: 399: 395: 393: 391: 389: 387: 385: 383: 381: 379: 376: 372: 369: 368: 364: 360: 356: 349: 345: 341: 339: 336: 330: 326: 322: 318: 314: 311: 309: 305: 301: 297: 293: 292: 287: 283: 279: 275: 274: 273: 272: 269: 264: 260: 256: 251: 248: 247: 246: 245: 237: 236:WP:ITSNOTABLE 233: 229: 224: 221: 213: 209: 206: 203: 199: 195: 191: 188: 185: 182: 179: 176: 173: 170: 167: 163: 160: 159:Find sources: 155: 151: 146: 140: 136: 132: 128: 123: 119: 114: 110: 106: 102: 98: 97: 91: 88: 86: 83: 81: 78: 76: 73: 65: 62: 60: 59: 55: 51: 47: 40: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 729: 726: 703: 682: 661: 644: 623: 607:Шизомби (Sz) 585: 584: 567: 546: 534:Шизомби (Sz) 529: 525: 521: 486: 459: 370: 343: 328: 324: 317:Toronto Star 316: 312: 295: 278:Шизомби (Sz) 249: 231: 227: 225: 222: 219: 207: 201: 193: 186: 180: 174: 168: 158: 45: 43: 31: 28: 708:image macro 670:Umbralcorax 572:Der Spiegel 507:So fix it. 460:Der Spiegel 428:So fix it. 375:Image macro 184:free images 442:WP:SOFIXIT 398:Rocketboom 688:JBsupreme 551:shorthand 547:Weak keep 355:• Gene93k 624:Redirect 586:Wine Guy 263:contribs 255:Eastmain 232:reliable 145:View log 50:Tim Song 649:Bearian 522:Comment 491:Qrsdogg 474:Windows 416:Windows 321:lolcats 190:WP refs 178:scholar 118:protect 113:history 666:WP:HEY 632:Bejnar 555:B.Wind 466:Fences 446:B.Wind 408:Fences 313:Delete 162:Google 122:delete 101:O RLY? 64:O RLY? 706:into 704:Merge 593:~Talk 470:& 412:& 300:Bobak 296:Keep' 205:JSTOR 166:books 139:views 131:watch 127:links 16:< 716:talk 694:talk 683:Keep 674:talk 664:per 662:Keep 653:talk 645:Keep 636:talk 611:talk 568:Keep 559:talk 538:talk 528:and 495:talk 487:Keep 450:talk 371:Keep 359:talk 344:Note 329:worm 304:talk 282:talk 259:talk 250:Keep 198:FENS 172:news 135:logs 109:talk 105:edit 54:talk 46:keep 626:to 353:-- 325:CRN 228:how 212:TWL 147:• 143:– ( 718:) 697:) 676:) 655:) 638:) 613:) 561:) 540:) 497:) 452:) 361:) 350:. 306:) 284:) 261:• 192:) 137:| 133:| 129:| 125:| 120:| 116:| 111:| 107:| 56:) 48:. 714:( 691:( 672:( 651:( 634:( 609:( 557:( 536:( 493:( 448:( 357:( 302:( 294:' 280:( 265:) 257:( 216:) 208:· 202:· 194:· 187:· 181:· 175:· 169:· 164:( 156:( 153:) 141:) 103:( 52:(

Index

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
deletion review
Tim Song
talk
17:20, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
O RLY?
Articles for deletion/O RLY?
Articles for deletion/O RLY? (2nd nomination)
Articles for deletion/O RLY? (3rd nomination)
Articles for deletion/O RLY? (4th nomination)
O RLY?
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
AfD statistics
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.