355:, but with rewrite. The article has no citations and is written like an advertisment, although I think that the topic is notable and has been featured in secondary sources (although to an extent that we would ahve to crop some of the information). There is no rule against referenceing homepages where other sources exist, and there is alos no rule that says a bad article is one for deltion.
405:: OWASP's material is surely basic reference for anyone working in web development or security, so I am surprised to see the organisation here. However, an "it's notable" argument is clearly inappropriate; I have added various book and publication references into the article as references. One can also find OWASP being referenced by
553:. If we rewrite the advertisement-like sentences (specifically removing the mention of the non-profit organization in the lede, or perhaps moving it to the end of the article), this could be a useful article. The subject is in itself useful and notable, it's just that the article for it needs a little work. —
451:
editors shoot themselves in the foot. In principle this should be a notable organisation, I agree, but I didn't even get a straight answer on the talk to what sort and this EXT link promo SPA farm is just a mess. Would you stub it? If kept, can we agree to be more strict about COI editors disclosing
574:
certification, & I can tell you that this is an organization that produces research & software that is valuable to the computer security community. While the article can use additional citations, the thirteen citations establish notability, particularly in its field of knowledge. Lose the
469:
Well, at minimum I would expect to keep sufficient on the organisation to meet an encyclopaedia user's "who?" query (e.g. after reading that ICO document) and enough to meet a basic "what?" query, which for me would be the OWASP Top Ten paragraph, plus probably those on the ASVS and the
Testing
253:
but none of it seems convincing enough of a better article. It's worth noting the two products (listed at the side) were also deleted at separately timed AfDs (2009 and 2012) so I'm not entirely sure if this one is solidly keepable. Notifying past users and taggers
470:
Guide. Detail on tools such as ZAP and
Webgoat are less important and can be found by the interested user on the OWASP site itself. So losing the Chapters section and pruning the Projects section would create a sufficiently improved article in my view.
536:. This has been on my TODO list for quite some time. I've worked in security and found OWASP a useful reference. Granted, it is not well written, but I will, in time, get to it. I have texts with some info for citation.
95:
202:
90:
155:
410:
100:
571:
242:
284:
196:
162:
85:
505:
I'm interested in others' input on whether the suggested changes are appropriate, so after allowing an interval, I'll probably apply a
17:
237:
so here we are and I echo my comments before for this being questionably notable and improvable as the best links I found was only
246:
509:
edit along these lines. As to the article's future, I take your point about the risk of it being weighed down by COI edits.
238:
250:
603:
40:
584:
562:
545:
518:
500:
479:
464:
430:
393:
364:
347:
298:
276:
68:
217:
360:
444:
184:
128:
123:
64:
293:
271:
132:
115:
320:
599:
541:
406:
356:
36:
414:
310:
178:
558:
60:
324:
288:
266:
210:
174:
580:
259:
496:
460:
389:
343:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
598:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
506:
317:
224:
55:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
537:
448:
440:
418:
378:
374:
328:
314:
554:
514:
475:
426:
263:
576:
575:
promo, not the article. There is no need to throw out this baby with the bathwater.
491:
455:
384:
338:
255:
190:
149:
510:
471:
422:
234:
119:
443:? So who's ever going to fix it - it's been years and got worse. Although
452:
and edit requesting on the talk. There's 20-30 or more SPAs on this!
373:
Can you explain? Articles with no citations get deleted as failing
111:
74:
592:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
145:
141:
137:
209:
488:
If you agree to stub it, I will change to weak keep.
96:
Articles for deletion/OWASP Mantra
Security Framework
223:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
606:). No further edits should be made to this page.
323:(+0.5). There's sources at my first AfD, may be
377:. Promo articles like this can get deleted per
570:, but rewrite. I am one of those geeks with a
413:. All in all, for me there is enough to pass
285:list of Software-related deletion discussions
8:
283:Note: This debate has been included in the
91:Articles for deletion/OWASP (2nd nomination)
327:, or just a case of all the promo needing
282:
101:Articles for deletion/OWASP O2 Platform
83:
335:COI editors and SPA accounts on talk)
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
313:together with borderline notability
81:
24:
439:You'd rather keep this mess than
411:the UK Information Commissioner
1:
546:23:36, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
519:09:55, 28 November 2015 (UTC)
501:09:37, 28 November 2015 (UTC)
480:09:31, 28 November 2015 (UTC)
465:09:20, 28 November 2015 (UTC)
431:09:08, 28 November 2015 (UTC)
394:09:06, 28 November 2015 (UTC)
365:08:28, 28 November 2015 (UTC)
348:07:50, 28 November 2015 (UTC)
299:07:12, 28 November 2015 (UTC)
277:07:11, 28 November 2015 (UTC)
585:21:40, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
563:23:08, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
447:, I've never seen this many
69:02:21, 5 December 2015 (UTC)
86:Articles for deletion/OWASP
623:
595:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
233:Speedy was removed by
80:AfDs for this article:
331:to start over. (Note
407:UK government advice
309:blatant promo (-1)
301:
59:
56:non-admin closure
614:
597:
499:
494:
463:
458:
445:WP:AFDNOTCLEANUP
392:
387:
357:RailwayScientist
346:
341:
296:
291:
274:
269:
228:
227:
213:
165:
153:
135:
53:
34:
622:
621:
617:
616:
615:
613:
612:
611:
610:
604:deletion review
593:
490:
489:
454:
453:
383:
382:
337:
336:
294:
289:
272:
267:
170:
161:
126:
110:
107:
105:
78:
61:DavidLeighEllis
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
620:
618:
609:
608:
588:
587:
565:
548:
530:
529:
528:
527:
526:
525:
524:
523:
522:
521:
483:
482:
434:
433:
399:
398:
397:
396:
368:
367:
350:
303:
302:
290:SwisterTwister
268:SwisterTwister
231:
230:
167:
106:
104:
103:
98:
93:
88:
82:
79:
77:
72:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
619:
607:
605:
601:
596:
590:
589:
586:
582:
578:
573:
569:
566:
564:
560:
556:
552:
549:
547:
543:
539:
535:
532:
531:
520:
516:
512:
508:
504:
503:
502:
498:
493:
487:
486:
485:
484:
481:
477:
473:
468:
467:
466:
462:
457:
450:
446:
442:
438:
437:
436:
435:
432:
428:
424:
420:
416:
412:
408:
404:
401:
400:
395:
391:
386:
380:
376:
372:
371:
370:
369:
366:
362:
358:
354:
351:
349:
345:
340:
334:
330:
326:
322:
319:
316:
312:
308:
305:
304:
300:
297:
292:
286:
281:
280:
279:
278:
275:
270:
265:
261:
260:SarekOfVulcan
257:
252:
248:
244:
240:
236:
226:
222:
219:
216:
212:
208:
204:
201:
198:
195:
192:
189:
186:
183:
180:
176:
173:
172:Find sources:
168:
164:
160:
157:
151:
147:
143:
139:
134:
130:
125:
121:
117:
113:
109:
108:
102:
99:
97:
94:
92:
89:
87:
84:
76:
73:
71:
70:
66:
62:
57:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
594:
591:
567:
550:
533:
402:
352:
332:
321:WP:CORPDEPTH
306:
232:
220:
214:
206:
199:
193:
187:
181:
171:
158:
49:
47:
31:
28:
538:Softtest123
415:WP:ORGDEPTH
311:WP:NOTPROMO
307:Weak Delete
197:free images
555:Loadmaster
325:WP:TOOSOON
264:Richhoncho
600:talk page
37:talk page
602:or in a
577:Peaceray
156:View log
39:or in a
507:WP:BOLD
492:Widefox
456:Widefox
409:and by
385:Widefox
339:Widefox
318:WP:CORP
256:Widefox
203:WP refs
191:scholar
129:protect
124:history
449:WP:SPA
441:WP:TNT
419:WP:GNG
379:WP:TNT
375:WP:GNG
329:WP:TNT
315:WP:GNG
175:Google
133:delete
572:CISSP
511:AllyD
472:AllyD
423:AllyD
235:Feezo
218:JSTOR
179:books
163:Stats
150:views
142:watch
138:links
112:OWASP
75:OWASP
16:<
581:talk
568:Keep
559:talk
551:Keep
542:talk
534:Keep
515:talk
497:talk
476:talk
461:talk
427:talk
417:and
403:Keep
390:talk
361:talk
353:Keep
344:talk
333:many
295:talk
273:talk
262:and
251:here
249:and
247:here
243:here
239:here
211:FENS
185:news
146:logs
120:talk
116:edit
65:talk
50:keep
225:TWL
154:– (
52:.
583:)
561:)
544:)
517:)
495:;
478:)
459:;
429:)
421:.
388:;
381:.
363:)
342:;
287:.
258:,
245:,
241:,
205:)
148:|
144:|
140:|
136:|
131:|
127:|
122:|
118:|
67:)
579:(
557:(
540:(
513:(
474:(
425:(
359:(
229:)
221:·
215:·
207:·
200:·
194:·
188:·
182:·
177:(
169:(
166:)
159:·
152:)
114:(
63:(
58:)
54:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.