Knowledge (XXG)

:Articles for deletion/Omar Hamed - Knowledge (XXG)

Source 📝

396:@Sandstein - 4 out of the 6 cited sources are of low quality. 2 of the sources originate from brief articles in the New Zealand Herald, a respected newspaper. However, the scoop.co.nz source is merely a biased press release, two of the cited links no longer exist (and did not originate from a noteworthy source regardless), and the final link refers to the highly obscure magazine of the little-known New Zealand "Workers' Party" - a party that received 0.04% of the popular vote in the 2008 elections. Due to the low quality of the sources, lack of notability of the subject, and strong possibility of bias and/or self-editing, I stand by my decision to nominate this article for deletion. 261:- The October 2007 terror raids are of huge popular interest in New Zealand and the trials are going to be happening over the next 12 months, which is going to lead to lots of media coverage (of course, everything is sub justice until then, so there are lots of people who can't say/write stuff at the moment). 375:
Relist comment: Subject is a BLP and deserves extra attention. None of the comments so far are very useful, as they only assert that the subject is (or is not) notable, but do not address the several sources now in the article and explain why these sources are (or are not) sufficient for notability.
485:
let the matter rest until the upcoming trials, which media reports suggest are going to do more to show the individuals individually, with separate trails for some. If nothing else, the trials are likely to lead to the publications of more details and the dropping of suppression injunctions.
504:- The trials are not scheduled until August, and Hamed is not actually charged with anything notable (i.e. terrorism), he is charged with possessing a firearm. If everyone charged with possessing a firearm had a wikipedia page, wiki would be very crowded. 149: 473:- Has done nothing notable. Linking to non-existent articles seems more of an attempt to gain notability through his article rather than prove it. Belonging to a few organisations is certainly not notable. 242: 110: 212: 462: 143: 413:
The case is notable, the individual in question isn't. The main article on the case can easily accommodate those involved and any future developments of note.
180:
Not notable. Strong suggestion of self-editing by subject of page. Much information is superfluous. Much information lacks a reliable source.
309: 17: 458: 83: 78: 87: 164: 528: 131: 36: 70: 527:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
333: 125: 446: 491: 430: 266: 454: 293: 121: 513: 509: 495: 477: 434: 417: 405: 401: 388: 367: 337: 320: 297: 270: 253: 229: 202: 189: 185: 52: 74: 157: 347: 280: 171: 505: 397: 329: 181: 66: 58: 487: 426: 262: 248: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
450: 289: 313: 137: 414: 379: 358: 225: 49: 104: 350:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
283:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
220: 521:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
100: 96: 92: 156: 355:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 288:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 170: 39:). No further edits should be made to this page. 531:). No further edits should be made to this page. 243:list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions 8: 442:- Outside of the raids, seems low profile. 213:list of People-related deletion discussions 312:. Hamed, however, does not appear to be. 237: 207: 241:: This debate has been included in the 211:: This debate has been included in the 18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion 7: 24: 1: 321:15:03, 29 December 2010 (UTC) 298:23:59, 27 December 2010 (UTC) 271:18:32, 23 December 2010 (UTC) 254:20:41, 21 December 2010 (UTC) 230:18:27, 21 December 2010 (UTC) 203:08:09, 21 December 2010 (UTC) 190:00:16, 21 December 2010 (UTC) 514:12:00, 14 January 2011 (UTC) 496:08:43, 13 January 2011 (UTC) 478:07:15, 12 January 2011 (UTC) 53:14:00, 14 January 2011 (UTC) 463:12:12, 8 January 2011 (UTC) 435:04:56, 8 January 2011 (UTC) 418:13:34, 7 January 2011 (UTC) 406:21:08, 7 January 2011 (UTC) 389:10:34, 6 January 2011 (UTC) 368:10:31, 6 January 2011 (UTC) 338:10:50, 5 January 2011 (UTC) 548: 524:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 310:obviously quite notable 44:The result was 466: 449:comment added by 387: 370: 366: 328:- Fairly notable. 300: 246: 232: 216: 539: 526: 476: 465: 443: 386: 384: 377: 365: 363: 356: 354: 352: 317: 287: 285: 251: 217: 201: 175: 174: 160: 108: 90: 34: 547: 546: 542: 541: 540: 538: 537: 536: 535: 529:deletion review 522: 475:DerbyCountyinNZ 474: 444: 380: 378: 359: 357: 345: 315: 278: 249: 200:DerbyCountyinNZ 199: 198:- Not notable. 117: 81: 65: 62: 37:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 545: 543: 534: 533: 517: 516: 498: 480: 467: 437: 422:I still think 420: 408: 391: 372: 371: 353: 342: 341: 340: 323: 308:The raids are 302: 301: 286: 275: 274: 273: 256: 235: 233: 205: 178: 177: 114: 61: 56: 42: 41: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 544: 532: 530: 525: 519: 518: 515: 511: 507: 503: 499: 497: 493: 489: 484: 481: 479: 472: 468: 464: 460: 456: 452: 448: 441: 438: 436: 432: 428: 425: 421: 419: 416: 412: 409: 407: 403: 399: 395: 392: 390: 385: 383: 374: 373: 369: 364: 362: 351: 349: 344: 343: 339: 335: 331: 330:Hillcountries 327: 324: 322: 319: 318: 311: 307: 304: 303: 299: 295: 291: 284: 282: 277: 276: 272: 268: 264: 260: 257: 255: 252: 244: 240: 236: 234: 231: 227: 223: 222: 214: 210: 206: 204: 197: 194: 193: 192: 191: 187: 183: 173: 169: 166: 163: 159: 155: 151: 148: 145: 142: 139: 136: 133: 130: 127: 123: 120: 119:Find sources: 115: 112: 106: 102: 98: 94: 89: 85: 80: 76: 72: 68: 64: 63: 60: 57: 55: 54: 51: 47: 40: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 523: 520: 501: 488:Stuartyeates 482: 470: 445:— Preceding 439: 427:Stuartyeates 423: 410: 393: 381: 360: 346: 325: 314: 305: 279: 263:Stuartyeates 258: 238: 219: 208: 195: 179: 167: 161: 153: 146: 140: 134: 128: 118: 45: 43: 31: 28: 483:Suggestion: 316:Ravenswing 290:Ron Ritzman 144:free images 451:Efil's god 382:Sandstein 361:Sandstein 67:Omar Hamed 59:Omar Hamed 326:Weak Keep 459:contribs 447:unsigned 348:Relisted 281:Relisted 111:View log 394:Delete: 306:Delete: 250:gadfium 150:WP refs 138:scholar 84:protect 79:history 50:Spartaz 506:Lumin8 502:Delete 500:Still 471:Delete 469:Still 440:Delete 415:Jørdan 411:Delete 398:Lumin8 218:-- -- 196:Delete 182:Lumin8 122:Google 88:delete 46:delete 165:JSTOR 126:books 105:views 97:watch 93:links 16:< 510:talk 492:talk 455:talk 431:talk 424:keep 402:talk 334:talk 294:talk 267:talk 259:Keep 239:Note 226:talk 221:Cirt 209:Note 186:talk 158:FENS 132:news 101:logs 75:talk 71:edit 172:TWL 109:– ( 512:) 494:) 461:) 457:• 433:) 404:) 336:) 296:) 269:) 245:. 228:) 215:. 188:) 152:) 103:| 99:| 95:| 91:| 86:| 82:| 77:| 73:| 48:. 508:( 490:( 453:( 429:( 400:( 332:( 292:( 265:( 247:- 224:( 184:( 176:) 168:· 162:· 154:· 147:· 141:· 135:· 129:· 124:( 116:( 113:) 107:) 69:(

Index

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
deletion review
Spartaz
14:00, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
Omar Hamed
Omar Hamed
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL
Lumin8
talk
00:16, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
08:09, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
list of People-related deletion discussions

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.