301:. This is not just another chat site, it's the first to not use identifiers for users - simply "You" and "Stranger". It's revolutionary! ... okay, maybe not, but it is definatly different than most if not all the others - and 3,700 users in under a month from release is quite a respectable feat on its' own., 8:37, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
361:- I understand Whpq's concern and would agree, if all these News hits were in response to a press release. However, this appears to be genuine word-of-mouth, giving the coverage a bit of extra weight. If no-one is talking about Omegle in a few months time then yes, perhaps another AfD.
344:- what I see a are lot of "Website of the Day" type coverage. It seems to me that this puts this into the category of a news item and with it launching only recently, there's no indication that coverage will be sustained to meet notability. --
309:. It was a fad that had it's time in about a weekend. There were various articles and I saw lots of hype amongst forumers but it's over now. Everyone tried it those first few days, realised how it worked, appreciated it and moved on.
224:
is. It's determined from availability of sources, not how many people use it. And if you google news search it, you get quite a few sources. Also, that's not "3700 users", that's "3700 users online at any one time". -
273:
How is this article in any way spammy? It's not written in a promotional tone, and hasn't got tons of external links. And even if it did, there are sources, it could be rewritten. -
123:
150:
325:. It could use a little fleshing out, which I will take a stab at, but I think its significant enough to have an article. --
17:
178:
211:
90:
85:
402:
162:
94:
36:
401:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
77:
378:- It is substantially different from other chat sites, although the article definitely needs improvement.
283:
235:
190:
57:
383:
366:
207:
158:
379:
264:
330:
131:
387:
370:
353:
334:
315:
289:
268:
241:
215:
196:
166:
139:
59:
206:. I'm not entirely sure that a chat site with 3700 users is notable enough for a wiki article.
275:
227:
182:
50:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
362:
135:
310:
349:
257:
252:
326:
111:
221:
81:
345:
73:
65:
395:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
118:
107:
103:
99:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
405:). No further edits should be made to this page.
220:Then I don't think you understand entirely what
151:list of Websites-related deletion discussions
8:
145:
149:: This debate has been included in the
7:
24:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
422:
388:14:29, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
371:09:36, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
354:19:24, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
335:15:35, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
316:13:36, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
290:09:16, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
269:22:51, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
242:09:11, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
216:19:50, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
197:14:06, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
167:17:06, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
140:16:20, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
60:18:50, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
398:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
44:The result was
169:
154:
413:
400:
288:
286:
281:
278:
267:
262:
240:
238:
233:
230:
208:Fol de rol troll
195:
193:
188:
185:
177:. Not nn at all.
155:
130:nn chat website
121:
115:
97:
53:
34:
421:
420:
416:
415:
414:
412:
411:
410:
409:
403:deletion review
396:
284:
279:
276:
274:
263:
260:
256:
236:
231:
228:
226:
191:
186:
183:
181:
159:LinguistAtLarge
117:
88:
72:
69:
51:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
419:
417:
408:
407:
391:
390:
373:
356:
338:
337:
319:
318:
303:
302:
295:
294:
293:
292:
258:
246:
245:
244:
200:
199:
171:
170:
128:
127:
68:
63:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
418:
406:
404:
399:
393:
392:
389:
385:
381:
377:
374:
372:
368:
364:
360:
357:
355:
351:
347:
343:
340:
339:
336:
332:
328:
324:
321:
320:
317:
314:
313:
308:
305:
304:
300:
297:
296:
291:
287:
282:
272:
271:
270:
266:
261:
254:
250:
247:
243:
239:
234:
223:
219:
218:
217:
213:
209:
205:
202:
201:
198:
194:
189:
179:
176:
173:
172:
168:
165:
164:
160:
152:
148:
144:
143:
142:
141:
137:
133:
125:
120:
113:
109:
105:
101:
96:
92:
87:
83:
79:
75:
71:
70:
67:
64:
62:
61:
58:
55:
54:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
397:
394:
375:
358:
341:
322:
311:
306:
298:
248:
203:
174:
157:
146:
129:
52:Juliancolton
49:
46:no consensus
45:
43:
31:
28:
363:Marasmusine
307:Weak delete
312:Greg Tyler
222:notability
380:Kak Dela?
359:Weak keep
259:South Bay
327:Milowent
124:View log
253:WP:SPAM
91:protect
86:history
342:Delete
265:(talk)
251:: per
249:Delete
204:Delete
132:Gaikce
119:delete
95:delete
74:Omegle
66:Omegle
122:) – (
112:views
104:watch
100:links
16:<
384:talk
376:Keep
367:talk
350:talk
346:Whpq
331:talk
323:Keep
299:Keep
285:shoe
280:lake
277:file
237:shoe
232:lake
229:file
212:talk
192:shoe
187:lake
184:file
175:Keep
163:Talk
156:-- —
147:Note
136:talk
108:logs
82:talk
78:edit
48:. –
386:)
369:)
352:)
333:)
255:.
214:)
180:-
161:•
153:.
138:)
110:|
106:|
102:|
98:|
93:|
89:|
84:|
80:|
56:|
382:(
365:(
348:(
329:(
210:(
134:(
126:)
116:(
114:)
76:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.