188:- does not appear to be be a notable use of the term; total lack of sourcing, along with a variety of different uses implies to me that this is basically a niche neologism, used by different people in different ways. Does not appear to be notable enough to be encyclopedic. --
300:
section) give a very different definition. Neither equates "omnitheism" and pantheism, so I don't see a warrant for redirecting the former to the latter; such a redirect would be confusing for anyone who uses the term and useless for anyone who doesn't. —
130:
publication which even includes the word "omnitheism" or "omnitheist": a 1999 book which says an omnitheist is "someone who believes that God is everywhere." That definition is completely unrelated to this article, which is a prime example of
353:, a redirect would not be helpful. A redirect could also be reverted to the current article at any time -- an afd cannot make a decision to redirect binding unless it is "delete and replace with a redirect to..."
321:
Many academic and scientific coinages are mixtures of Greek and and latin roots -- indeed many later latin words are borrowings from the greek. There is nothing wrong with such a coinage. The problem is tha tthis
328:"The English language is the result of the attempts of Norman men-at-arms to make dates with Saxon barmaids, and no more legitimate than any of the other results." -H. Beam Piper
326:
a coinage, with no apparent notability. If it had notability, the etyomology would not be a problem. as for "illegitimate hybrids", IMO there is no such thing in english:
169:
115:
17:
296:
The book mentioned above says an omnitheist is one who thinks God is everywhere, but this article (and the pages linked to in its
261:
88:
83:
311:
153:
92:
386:
36:
75:
385:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
126:
speculation about a newly-termed religious belief. Searches of EBSCO, JSTOR and Google Books turned up just
287:
God. Such hybrids are to be deplored. The creator needs to establish that his concept is somthing else.
239:
279:
for which this neologism is presumably a synonym. The new word is an illegitimate hybrid between Latin
371:
359:
335:
316:
291:
267:
245:
220:
208:
192:
179:
158:
57:
228:, search engine didn't find many hits, so probably non-notable. Also has no references, so probably
349:
can be cited that establish the widespread use of this term, and its consequent notability. As per
205:
357:
333:
288:
258:
140:
307:
234:
149:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
132:
123:
79:
346:
229:
201:
53:
368:
354:
330:
254:
350:
302:
144:
109:
217:
176:
189:
71:
63:
276:
50:
379:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
136:
105:
101:
97:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
200:as nn and badly-defined neologism, not to mention
389:). No further edits should be made to this page.
216:, I cant find any scholarly use of the term.
122:This article consists of detailed yet wholly
8:
168:: This debate has been included in the
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
367:as original research/soap boxing.
170:list of Religion-related deletions
24:
1:
406:
372:20:58, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
360:04:18, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
336:04:18, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
317:02:20, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
292:22:48, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
268:20:22, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
246:19:08, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
221:06:03, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
209:05:47, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
193:05:17, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
180:02:31, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
135:and has been prominently
58:00:18, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
382:Please do not modify it.
159:23:51, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
329:
315:
230:original research
182:
173:
157:
133:original research
397:
384:
347:reliable sources
327:
305:
283:- all and Greek
244:
242:
237:
174:
164:
147:
113:
95:
34:
405:
404:
400:
399:
398:
396:
395:
394:
393:
387:deletion review
380:
264:
240:
235:
233:
218:John Vandenberg
177:John Vandenberg
86:
70:
67:
44:The result was
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
403:
401:
392:
391:
375:
374:
362:
340:
339:
338:
319:
298:External links
270:
262:
248:
223:
211:
195:
183:
139:as such since
120:
119:
66:
61:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
402:
390:
388:
383:
377:
376:
373:
370:
366:
363:
361:
358:
356:
352:
348:
344:
341:
337:
334:
332:
325:
320:
318:
313:
309:
304:
299:
295:
294:
293:
290:
289:Peterkingiron
286:
282:
278:
274:
271:
269:
265:
259:
256:
252:
249:
247:
243:
238:
231:
227:
224:
222:
219:
215:
212:
210:
207:
203:
199:
196:
194:
191:
187:
184:
181:
178:
171:
167:
163:
162:
161:
160:
155:
151:
146:
142:
138:
134:
129:
125:
117:
111:
107:
103:
99:
94:
90:
85:
81:
77:
73:
69:
68:
65:
62:
60:
59:
56:
55:
52:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
381:
378:
364:
342:
323:
297:
284:
280:
272:
250:
225:
213:
197:
185:
165:
127:
124:unattributed
121:
49:
45:
43:
31:
28:
253:per nom. —
236:*Cremepuff
141:2007-03-30
72:Omnitheism
64:Omnitheism
277:Pantheism
369:DreamGuy
312:contribs
273:Redirect
263:contribs
255:Disavian
154:contribs
116:View log
351:Elembis
345:unless
303:Elembis
206:Ford MF
145:Elembis
89:protect
84:history
365:Delete
343:Delete
226:Delete
214:Delete
198:Delete
186:Delete
137:tagged
93:delete
46:delete
285:Theos
281:Omnis
251:Delte
202:WP:OR
190:Haemo
110:views
102:watch
98:links
16:<
308:talk
241:222*
166:Note
150:talk
143:. —
106:logs
80:talk
76:edit
355:DES
331:DES
275:to
204:.
175:--
172:.
128:one
114:– (
324:is
310:·
266:)
232:.
152:·
108:|
104:|
100:|
96:|
91:|
87:|
82:|
78:|
54:13
51:Sr
48:.
314:)
306:(
260:/
257:(
156:)
148:(
118:)
112:)
74:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.