204:
space.. (I have used OnTime and other similar products for years). I truly feel like this software warrants an addition to
Knowledge (XXG). Once you review the content, I don't think you will consider it advertising, especially when they are from third party sources. I didn't pull this information from thin air. Please let me know what else I can do (I am still not done making additions, but I strongly believe that in its current state, it clearly exceeds qualifications). Thanks.
203:
Hello, I thought you were allowed to delete the prod tag if you believed that the delete option was not appropriate as it states in the prod tag warning (If I understand what the prod tag is)? This software has been around since 2002, and is a major player in the project management and bug tracking
360:, you will find other list entries that should be similarly deleted. To allow them to stay and remove this article treats article retention policy capriciously. We must be fair. I would mark the article as needing additional references and reviews from notable publications and keep it. --
283:- Zacharyklein, I do not want to be rude or to judge, or to accuse someone, but are you in any way related to Axosoft and OnTime, employee, owner, fan? Because I checked out your contrib history and you have only created (and collaborated within) two article
468:. References are to reviews roughly concurrent with new releases, press releases announcing version changes, and petty software industry trade awards for "Excellence & Productivity" and the like. No indication that this product has any
221:
Just a side note: I didn't even mean to delete that prod tag.. I figured out that I wrote over it on accident when I edited an older page that didn't even have a tag yet (so, when I saved, it went away).. Sorry about that. :-)
382:. This goes to the nature of mistakes made by Zacharyklein. Clearly newbie mistakes. If the prod does succeed, which I hope it doesn't, then someone should coach the new editor in what is and isn't acceptable. --
355:
Product stub. Should be expanded not deleted. If it reads like an ad, you haven't been reading many software dev ads lately. It lists some of the product's features. If you look at other products listed at
154:
266:
Good call
Eduemoni, I just searched around and found a site that goes over the features pretty well and added a few features and made a "Features" section to help clarify what this software does.
115:
329:
529:
I note that "back office software" is not a reason for deletion;rather, it means that there are likely to be few available sources and we should be more flexible. _
148:
239:- The article looks like an advertisement, the software has gained several recognitions, but no real info about what the software really is.
512:
439:
357:
17:
559:, product has numerous third party sources cited. There's enough for an article, and it seems to meet our standards of notability.
587:
36:
401:
387:
365:
169:
136:
88:
83:
545:
92:
586:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
507:
434:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
75:
533:
397:
383:
361:
271:
227:
209:
53:
130:
379:
267:
223:
205:
461:
190:
568:
564:
502:
499:
429:
426:
162:
126:
490:
417:
315:
255:
572:
549:
518:
480:
445:
405:
391:
378:. Looking at the editors focus, it seems to be centred on this product. Also, don't forget that
369:
344:
318:
275:
258:
231:
213:
194:
57:
185:
Advertising for unremarkable software. Author removed my prod tag and added more advertising.
340:
295:, because anyone can point out how irrelevant and non-notable the article is, and how much it
176:
49:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
469:
457:
292:
477:
375:
186:
472:
on history, technology, or culture. -25 notability points for calling it a "solution". -
560:
541:
301:
291:, which are very much related, if yes, try (as much as you can) to contribute with a
241:
142:
336:
374:
PS: Two other quick points. The first is, there's no guarantee that this is not a
109:
473:
466:
Hosted, Windows Client, and Web solution for project management and bug tracking
79:
493:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
420:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
537:
284:
288:
71:
63:
580:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
105:
101:
97:
161:
498:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
425:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
175:
396:I see a "recognition" section has been created. --
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
590:). No further edits should be made to this page.
330:list of Software-related deletion discussions
8:
328:Note: This debate has been included in the
327:
380:we're not supposed to bite the newcomers
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
478:killing the human spirit since 2003!
358:Comparison of issue-tracking systems
24:
1:
299:looks like an advertisement.
607:
573:22:19, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
550:19:27, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
519:10:18, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
481:14:45, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
446:06:45, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
406:19:54, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
392:17:53, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
370:17:49, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
345:22:41, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
319:21:41, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
276:21:07, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
259:17:38, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
232:21:07, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
214:21:07, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
195:15:30, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
58:01:00, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
583:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
293:Neutral Point of View
462:back office software
470:significant effect
44:The result was
553:
536:comment added by
521:
448:
347:
333:
598:
585:
552:
530:
515:
510:
505:
497:
495:
442:
437:
432:
424:
422:
334:
180:
179:
165:
113:
95:
34:
606:
605:
601:
600:
599:
597:
596:
595:
594:
588:deletion review
581:
531:
513:
508:
503:
488:
474:Smerdis of Tlön
458:Run of the mill
440:
435:
430:
415:
122:
86:
70:
67:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
604:
602:
593:
592:
576:
575:
554:
523:
522:
496:
485:
484:
483:
460:article about
450:
449:
423:
412:
411:
410:
409:
408:
398:Walter Görlitz
394:
384:Walter Görlitz
362:Walter Görlitz
349:
348:
324:
323:
322:
321:
261:
234:
216:
183:
182:
119:
66:
61:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
603:
591:
589:
584:
578:
577:
574:
570:
566:
562:
558:
555:
551:
547:
543:
539:
535:
528:
525:
524:
520:
516:
511:
506:
501:
494:
492:
487:
486:
482:
479:
475:
471:
467:
463:
459:
455:
452:
451:
447:
443:
438:
433:
428:
421:
419:
414:
413:
407:
403:
399:
395:
393:
389:
385:
381:
377:
373:
372:
371:
367:
363:
359:
354:
351:
350:
346:
342:
338:
331:
326:
325:
320:
317:
316:
314:
313:
310:
307:
304:
298:
294:
290:
286:
282:
279:
278:
277:
273:
269:
265:
262:
260:
257:
256:
254:
253:
250:
247:
244:
238:
235:
233:
229:
225:
220:
217:
215:
211:
207:
202:
199:
198:
197:
196:
192:
188:
178:
174:
171:
168:
164:
160:
156:
153:
150:
147:
144:
141:
138:
135:
132:
128:
125:
124:Find sources:
120:
117:
111:
107:
103:
99:
94:
90:
85:
81:
77:
73:
69:
68:
65:
62:
60:
59:
55:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
582:
579:
556:
532:— Preceding
526:
489:
465:
453:
416:
352:
311:
308:
305:
302:
300:
296:
280:
268:Zacharyklein
263:
251:
248:
245:
242:
240:
236:
224:Zacharyklein
218:
206:Zacharyklein
200:
184:
172:
166:
158:
151:
145:
139:
133:
123:
50:Juliancolton
46:no consensus
45:
43:
31:
28:
149:free images
187:NawlinWiki
561:Night Gyr
337:• Gene93k
546:contribs
534:unsigned
491:Relisted
418:Relisted
116:View log
500:King of
427:King of
285:Axosoft
281:Comment
264:Comment
219:Comment
201:Comment
155:WP refs
143:scholar
89:protect
84:history
454:Delete
376:WP:COI
289:OnTime
237:Delete
127:Google
93:delete
72:OnTime
64:OnTime
297:still
170:JSTOR
131:books
110:views
102:watch
98:links
16:<
565:talk
557:Keep
542:talk
527:keep
464:, a
402:talk
388:talk
366:talk
353:Keep
341:talk
287:and
272:talk
228:talk
210:talk
191:talk
163:FENS
137:news
106:logs
80:talk
76:edit
54:talk
538:DGG
456:.
335:--
177:TWL
114:– (
571:)
569:Oy
548:)
544:•
517:♠
476:-
444:♠
404:)
390:)
368:)
343:)
332:.
312:ni
309:mo
306:ue
303:Ed
274:)
252:ni
249:mo
246:ue
243:Ed
230:)
212:)
193:)
157:)
108:|
104:|
100:|
96:|
91:|
87:|
82:|
78:|
56:)
48:.
567:/
563:(
540:(
514:♣
509:♦
504:♥
441:♣
436:♦
431:♥
400:(
386:(
364:(
339:(
270:(
226:(
208:(
189:(
181:)
173:·
167:·
159:·
152:·
146:·
140:·
134:·
129:(
121:(
118:)
112:)
74:(
52:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.