251:
begun and a seperate article is premature. A merge to the parent article protects the information and the sourcing, and will be available exactly where readers might expect to find it at this early stage, even if the prequel is never filmed. Once production begins, a seperate article might well be welcomed.
250:
and that this attention does give the information a certain notability per guidelines, but since this is still at the pre-production stage, represents an idea from 1997, has not yet even been definitely cast, and despite the BBC announcing plans and scripts having been written, production has not
123:
186:
90:
85:
219:
etc. As a proposed prequel to the UK's most popular sitcom of all time (according to numerous surveys), this is clearly notable, whether it gets produced or not.
94:
77:
211:
307:
17:
341:. The subject has been covered in reliable sources, but the status of the production means it's not ready for a separate article. -
81:
365:
348:
333:
309:
286:
265:
228:
201:
176:
161:
143:
59:
215:
380:
36:
73:
65:
260:
379:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
346:
329:
305:
246:, as he is quite correct in that the proposed prequel is getting coverage in reliable sources that meet
238:
47:
217:
282:
253:
274:
131:
361:
170:
157:
342:
325:
302:
197:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
224:
139:
321:
247:
278:
320:
as suggested by
Schmidt. There are certainly reliable sources and it does seem to meet
130:
Apppears to have been a rumoured show for quite some time - no reliable sources either.
357:
153:
193:
53:
111:
243:
220:
135:
213:
296:
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
373:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
210:. Plenty of sources available for anyone who looks for them.
356:
as suggested by
Schmidt until it warrants its own article
118:
107:
103:
99:
152:, per nom. This show may never see the light of day.
301:
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
383:). No further edits should be made to this page.
187:list of Television-related deletion discussions
8:
324:, but is not ready to have its own article.
185:: This debate has been included in the
132:Knowledge (XXG) is not a crystal ball
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
1:
366:00:12, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
349:10:49, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
334:02:11, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
310:01:58, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
287:02:39, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
266:04:38, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
229:19:12, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
202:18:56, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
177:17:16, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
162:17:14, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
144:15:18, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
60:02:54, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
74:Once Upon a Time in Peckham
66:Once Upon a Time in Peckham
400:
376:Please do not modify it.
169:No sources, unverified.
32:Please do not modify it.
234:Merge and set Redirect
239:Only Fools and Horses
48:Only Fools and Horses
242:. With respects to
354:Merge and Redirect
339:Merge and Redirect
318:Merge and Redirect
175:and his otters •
44:The result was
312:
204:
190:
391:
378:
300:
298:
256:
191:
181:
173:
172:Ten Pound Hammer
121:
115:
97:
56:
34:
399:
398:
394:
393:
392:
390:
389:
388:
387:
381:deletion review
374:
294:
254:
171:
117:
88:
72:
69:
54:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
397:
395:
386:
385:
369:
368:
351:
336:
314:
313:
299:
291:
290:
289:
268:
231:
205:
179:
164:
128:
127:
68:
63:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
396:
384:
382:
377:
371:
370:
367:
363:
359:
355:
352:
350:
347:
344:
340:
337:
335:
331:
327:
323:
319:
316:
315:
311:
308:
306:
304:
297:
293:
292:
288:
284:
280:
276:
272:
269:
267:
264:
263:
262:
258:
257:
249:
245:
241:
240:
235:
232:
230:
226:
222:
218:
216:
214:
212:
209:
206:
203:
199:
195:
188:
184:
180:
178:
174:
168:
165:
163:
159:
155:
151:
148:
147:
146:
145:
141:
137:
133:
125:
120:
113:
109:
105:
101:
96:
92:
87:
83:
79:
75:
71:
70:
67:
64:
62:
61:
58:
57:
50:
49:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
375:
372:
353:
338:
326:FaerieInGrey
317:
303:Juliancolton
295:
270:
261:
259:
252:
237:
233:
207:
182:
166:
149:
129:
52:
45:
43:
31:
28:
244:User:JulesH
279:JamesBurns
275:WP:CRYSTAL
358:PaulJones
194:• Gene93k
154:Pyrrhus16
46:merge to
255:Schmidt,
124:View log
91:protect
86:history
55:MBisanz
322:WP:GNG
271:Delete
248:WP:GNG
221:JulesH
167:Delete
150:Delete
136:D.M.N.
119:delete
95:delete
122:) – (
112:views
104:watch
100:links
16:<
362:talk
330:talk
283:talk
225:talk
208:Keep
198:talk
183:Note
158:talk
140:talk
108:logs
82:talk
78:edit
343:Mgm
236:to
192:--
189:.
364:)
332:)
285:)
277:.
273::
227:)
200:)
160:)
142:)
134:.
110:|
106:|
102:|
98:|
93:|
89:|
84:|
80:|
51:.
360:(
345:|
328:(
281:(
223:(
196:(
156:(
138:(
126:)
116:(
114:)
76:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.