287:
deletion a couple weeks ago and haven't had reason to change my mind from that rationale: I'm finding very little by way of independent coverage of this award -- only primary sources/press releases and various awards databases. Looks to fail WP:GNG. In hindsight, with only an official link and imdb
168:
330:
Given we have a couple people who have looked for evidence of passing GNG and could not find it, could you link to the sources which constitute "significant coverage in reliable sources independent of the subject"? —
94:
89:
98:
162:
81:
52:. Headcount is 50-50, but reading the arguments for keeping, none cite any policy-based reasons. Numbers of google hits or passing mentions on dubious web sites are not enough. We need
128:
260:
121:
220:
240:
183:
150:
521:
503:
457:
439:
422:
404:
373:
340:
318:
297:
272:
252:
232:
212:
63:
474:
144:
430:- if you Google this, especially Google News, there are a large number of hits, including references to Danica McKellar, Jorja Fox, etc. --
140:
85:
480:
17:
190:
77:
69:
471:
486:
156:
483:
382:
351:
542:
40:
512:
show notability. We need "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject". —
445:
489:
538:
492:
468:
36:
514:
450:
415:
333:
290:
265:
245:
225:
176:
208:
60:
435:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
537:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
499:
419:
467:- per Oskinet and used on many television and film articles as a reliable award. Also, see
306:
200:
314:
199:
This is a page created in
December 2015 for an online awards body. I don't think it meets
53:
398:
367:
204:
57:
448:). Also, a brand new account apparently set up to !vote keep in a bunch of AfDs. —
431:
115:
495:
325:
310:
393:
362:
203:
as it lacks significant independent coverage in secondary reliable sources.
477:
288:
link and no claim to notability, it might've even qualified for A7. —
531:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
385:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
354:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
284:
111:
107:
103:
175:
391:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
360:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
189:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
545:). No further edits should be made to this page.
261:list of Television-related deletion discussions
78:Online Film & Television Association Award
70:Online Film & Television Association Award
8:
259:Note: This debate has been included in the
239:Note: This debate has been included in the
219:Note: This debate has been included in the
221:list of Events-related deletion discussions
258:
238:
218:
241:list of Film-related deletion discussions
444:Explicitly not a valid reason to keep (
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
508:"Mentions" are explicitly what
1:
305:. Looks good and it passes
562:
522:12:54, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
504:04:01, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
458:12:54, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
440:03:46, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
423:21:52, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
405:18:57, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
374:08:22, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
341:16:52, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
319:14:09, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
64:13:11, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
494:mentioning this award. -
298:17:31, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
273:17:29, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
253:17:29, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
233:17:29, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
213:11:36, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
534:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
407:
376:
275:
255:
235:
553:
536:
519:
517:
455:
453:
428:Very strong keep
401:
396:
390:
388:
386:
370:
365:
359:
357:
355:
338:
336:
329:
295:
293:
270:
268:
250:
248:
230:
228:
194:
193:
179:
131:
119:
101:
34:
561:
560:
556:
555:
554:
552:
551:
550:
549:
543:deletion review
532:
515:
513:
451:
449:
408:
399:
394:
381:
379:
377:
368:
363:
350:
348:
334:
332:
323:
291:
289:
266:
264:
246:
244:
226:
224:
136:
127:
92:
76:
73:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
559:
557:
548:
547:
527:
526:
525:
524:
516:Rhododendrites
462:
461:
460:
452:Rhododendrites
425:
416:Rhododendrites
389:
378:
358:
347:
346:
345:
344:
343:
335:Rhododendrites
300:
292:Rhododendrites
277:
276:
267:Rhododendrites
256:
247:Rhododendrites
236:
227:Rhododendrites
197:
196:
133:
72:
67:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
558:
546:
544:
540:
535:
529:
528:
523:
518:
511:
507:
506:
505:
501:
497:
493:
490:
487:
484:
481:
478:
475:
472:
469:
466:
463:
459:
454:
447:
446:WP:GOOGLEHITS
443:
442:
441:
437:
433:
429:
426:
424:
421:
417:
413:
410:
409:
406:
403:
402:
397:
387:
384:
375:
372:
371:
366:
356:
353:
342:
337:
327:
322:
321:
320:
316:
312:
308:
304:
301:
299:
294:
286:
282:
279:
278:
274:
269:
262:
257:
254:
249:
242:
237:
234:
229:
222:
217:
216:
215:
214:
210:
206:
202:
192:
188:
185:
182:
178:
174:
170:
167:
164:
161:
158:
155:
152:
149:
146:
142:
139:
138:Find sources:
134:
130:
126:
123:
117:
113:
109:
105:
100:
96:
91:
87:
83:
79:
75:
74:
71:
68:
66:
65:
62:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
533:
530:
509:
464:
427:
411:
392:
380:
361:
349:
302:
280:
198:
186:
180:
172:
165:
159:
153:
147:
137:
124:
49:
47:
31:
28:
420:Boomer Vial
163:free images
539:talk page
37:talk page
541:or in a
383:Relisted
352:Relisted
285:proposed
283:- I had
205:Cowlibob
122:View log
58:RoySmith
39:or in a
432:Oskinet
169:WP refs
157:scholar
95:protect
90:history
496:Brojam
412:Delete
307:WP:GNG
281:Delete
201:WP:GNG
141:Google
99:delete
61:(talk)
50:delete
510:don't
326:AffeL
311:AffeL
184:JSTOR
145:books
129:Stats
116:views
108:watch
104:links
56:. --
54:WP:RS
16:<
500:talk
465:Keep
436:talk
414:per
315:talk
309:. -
303:Keep
263:. —
243:. —
223:. —
209:talk
177:FENS
151:news
112:logs
86:talk
82:edit
520:\\
456:\\
400:947
369:947
339:\\
296:\\
271:\\
251:\\
231:\\
191:TWL
120:– (
502:)
491:,
488:,
485:,
482:,
479:,
476:,
473:,
470:,
438:)
418:.
317:)
211:)
171:)
114:|
110:|
106:|
102:|
97:|
93:|
88:|
84:|
498:(
434:(
395:J
364:J
328::
324:@
313:(
207:(
195:)
187:·
181:·
173:·
166:·
160:·
154:·
148:·
143:(
135:(
132:)
125:·
118:)
80:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.