Knowledge (XXG)

:Articles for deletion/Oakville Place - Knowledge (XXG)

Source 📝

398:
mall in a smaller community.  There were a number of minor hits on Google books, shifting between brief business connections, and gazetteer type attention.  I found no metrics in the primary source: no GLA, no acreage, no store count, no anchor count, no parking places, no annual visitors.  I count 106 stores, while the article lists 98.  I suspect that the topic is wp:notable, but it is enough for now to keep the topic included in the encyclopedia in a way that it can be expanded.
340:
Thanks -- I see you rewrote content, at the end of the day, in the target article, reflecting the sourcing, etc. I think redirect is therefore now appropriate. In general, I think it's a better idea to create the material at the target. First, it cuts down on the steps that need be done -- there is
443:
Yes, I noted them.  One tells us that there is weak drywall in the mall, along with some details about one of the escalators.  One references the mall as a venue.  As for WP:V, they don't help because they are not in the article.  As for WP:N, I felt that they carried little weight, although no one
397:
As far as wp:notability, I found no hits on news.google.com/newspapers, and two gazetteer type hits on regular Google news.  On Google books, the Directory of Major Malls shows that the nearest competing mall is 2 miles away, so perhaps this mall has a smaller influence on the region than a smaller
290:
A redirect is more appropriate. If you are going to add refs, you may as well do so to the target. And the existing article at the time of nomination (and now) was wholly unreferenced, and not therefore containing appropriate merge material (though the target now at least has it). Good job on the
359:
We can do that too. I've went ahead and added more sourced content to the Oakville, Ontario article. It's likely that more sources are available to further verify information in the Oakville Place article, so I retain my selective merge !vote, which will ultimately result in a redirect anyway.
418:!Vote changed.  Article has received the major rewrite, and in aggregate now satisfies WP:N, although consensus is that there is no current need for a standalone article, which is completely normal as per the lede of WP:N. 166: 466:). FYI, they were added to the article, for procedural purposes, as articles are typically supposed to have some sources. Additionally, regarding a merge, while content in Knowledge (XXG) should not rely upon 234: 119: 160: 214: 327:@Epeefleche: I find sourcing existing content in support of a merge to be easier and less time-consuming than rewriting content within the Oakville, Ontario article. 519:
Or, as discussed above, redirect ... in any event, either way the main focus here, the deletion of a stand-alone where one is not warranted, would be accomplished.
126: 341:
no need thereafter to move material. Second, it clarifies the scope of what the editor may wish to have merged, which otherwise is not clear. --
478:
content in articles. In a merge scenario, some sourcing from the mall's website would be fine to use in the Oakville, Ontario article.
92: 87: 17: 96: 79: 181: 269: 148: 266: 601: 40: 449: 423: 403: 314: 142: 582: 566: 548: 528: 510: 482: 453: 438: 427: 407: 364: 350: 331: 318: 300: 279: 246: 226: 206: 138: 61: 578:- Consensus herein thus far is now unanimous for a redirect, per the nominator's comment directly above. 597: 579: 545: 507: 479: 435: 361: 328: 276: 36: 188: 562: 524: 445: 419: 399: 346: 310: 296: 202: 59: 467: 462:
It's all good, I'm still for a selective merge anyway due to coverage I've found to be local-only (
174: 83: 544:, preserving the revision history per my comment above. Struck/modified my initial !vote above. 541: 503: 262: 242: 222: 51: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
596:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
154: 463: 272: 558: 520: 342: 292: 198: 56: 75: 67: 499: 475: 238: 218: 113: 444:
can say that the topic has not been noticed by the world at large.
590:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
471: 197:
NN 453,248 sq ft mall. Had been PRODed, but PROD was removed.
271:), and the topic doesn't appear to qualify for an article per 395:
Fails WP:V, so the article requires a complete rewrite.
109: 105: 101: 173: 309:You said nothing about WP:V problems in your nom. 291:refs that show, if not notability, that it exists. 235:
list of Shopping malls-related deletion discussions
187: 498:- More sources have been added to the article to 43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 604:). No further edits should be made to this page. 434:Please note the two sources in my !vote above. 8: 502:content within it, in support of a merge to 233:Note: This debate has been included in the 215:list of Ontario-related deletion discussions 213:Note: This debate has been included in the 232: 212: 18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion 7: 387:, with Template:R with possibilities 265:. Coverage is primarily local (e.g. 24: 557:I would be fine with a redirect. 1: 621: 583:02:26, 19 June 2014 (UTC) 567:00:39, 18 June 2014 (UTC) 549:13:28, 17 June 2014 (UTC) 529:12:54, 17 June 2014 (UTC) 511:07:07, 17 June 2014 (UTC) 483:06:19, 17 June 2014 (UTC) 454:06:01, 17 June 2014 (UTC) 439:04:31, 17 June 2014 (UTC) 428:23:09, 17 June 2014 (UTC) 408:03:26, 17 June 2014 (UTC) 385:Redirect without deletion 365:12:15, 17 June 2014 (UTC) 351:11:59, 17 June 2014 (UTC) 332:07:23, 17 June 2014 (UTC) 319:03:26, 17 June 2014 (UTC) 301:00:41, 17 June 2014 (UTC) 280:00:18, 17 June 2014 (UTC) 247:12:54, 11 June 2014 (UTC) 227:12:54, 11 June 2014 (UTC) 207:03:39, 11 June 2014 (UTC) 62:21:10, 19 June 2014 (UTC) 593:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 474:), they are usable to 391:Delete and redirect 472:the Mall's website 48:The result was 542:Oakville, Ontario 504:Oakville, Ontario 263:Oakville, Ontario 249: 229: 52:Oakville, Ontario 612: 595: 192: 191: 177: 129: 117: 99: 34: 620: 619: 615: 614: 613: 611: 610: 609: 608: 602:deletion review 591: 468:primary sources 446:Unscintillating 420:Unscintillating 400:Unscintillating 388: 311:Unscintillating 259:Selective merge 134: 125: 90: 74: 71: 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 618: 616: 607: 606: 586: 585: 576:Note to closer 572: 571: 570: 569: 552: 551: 534: 533: 532: 531: 514: 513: 492: 491: 490: 489: 488: 487: 486: 485: 457: 456: 432: 431: 430: 411: 410: 383: 380: 379: 378: 377: 376: 375: 374: 373: 372: 371: 370: 369: 368: 367: 354: 353: 335: 334: 322: 321: 304: 303: 283: 282: 251: 250: 230: 195: 194: 131: 76:Oakville Place 70: 68:Oakville Place 65: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 617: 605: 603: 599: 594: 588: 587: 584: 581: 577: 574: 573: 568: 564: 560: 556: 555: 554: 553: 550: 547: 543: 539: 536: 535: 530: 526: 522: 518: 517: 516: 515: 512: 509: 505: 501: 497: 494: 493: 484: 481: 477: 473: 469: 465: 461: 460: 459: 458: 455: 451: 447: 442: 441: 440: 437: 433: 429: 425: 421: 417: 416: 415: 414: 413: 412: 409: 405: 401: 396: 393: 392: 386: 382: 381: 366: 363: 358: 357: 356: 355: 352: 348: 344: 339: 338: 337: 336: 333: 330: 326: 325: 324: 323: 320: 316: 312: 308: 307: 306: 305: 302: 298: 294: 289: 288: 287: 286: 285: 284: 281: 278: 274: 270: 267: 264: 260: 256: 253: 252: 248: 244: 240: 236: 231: 228: 224: 220: 216: 211: 210: 209: 208: 204: 200: 190: 186: 183: 180: 176: 172: 168: 165: 162: 159: 156: 153: 150: 147: 144: 140: 137: 136:Find sources: 132: 128: 124: 121: 115: 111: 107: 103: 98: 94: 89: 85: 81: 77: 73: 72: 69: 66: 64: 63: 60: 58: 54: 53: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 592: 589: 580:NorthAmerica 575: 546:NorthAmerica 537: 508:NorthAmerica 495: 480:NorthAmerica 436:NorthAmerica 394: 390: 389: 384: 362:NorthAmerica 329:NorthAmerica 277:NorthAmerica 258: 254: 196: 184: 178: 170: 163: 157: 151: 145: 135: 122: 50:redirect to 49: 47: 31: 28: 161:free images 559:Epeefleche 521:Epeefleche 343:Epeefleche 293:Epeefleche 199:Epeefleche 57:j⚛e decker 598:talk page 239:• Gene93k 219:• Gene93k 37:talk page 600:or in a 538:Redirect 120:View log 39:or in a 496:Comment 255:Comment 167:WP refs 155:scholar 93:protect 88:history 500:verify 476:verify 470:(e.g. 464:WP:AUD 273:WP:AUD 139:Google 97:delete 182:JSTOR 143:books 127:Stats 114:views 106:watch 102:links 16:< 563:talk 525:talk 450:talk 424:talk 404:talk 347:talk 315:talk 297:talk 243:talk 223:talk 203:talk 175:FENS 149:news 110:logs 84:talk 80:edit 540:to 261:to 189:TWL 118:– ( 565:) 527:) 506:. 452:) 426:) 406:) 349:) 317:) 299:) 275:. 268:, 257:: 245:) 237:. 225:) 217:. 205:) 169:) 112:| 108:| 104:| 100:| 95:| 91:| 86:| 82:| 55:. 561:( 523:( 448:( 422:( 402:( 345:( 313:( 295:( 241:( 221:( 201:( 193:) 185:· 179:· 171:· 164:· 158:· 152:· 146:· 141:( 133:( 130:) 123:· 116:) 78:(

Index

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
talk page
deletion review
Oakville, Ontario
j⚛e decker

21:10, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
Oakville Place
Oakville Place
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Stats
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL
Epeefleche

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.