210:
Per the sources and expansion found by
Someone I think this can be withdrawn. Google still has a long way to go in topics pre Internet as they have with non Anglo coverage so the fact that this game was reviewed in notable magazines of that period is sufficient. COuld still use more sources though..♦
410:
after all that, they're now cited and the article has gone from a sentence or two to a decent start-class article. I would suggest withdrawing this AFD and would also ask anyone with misgivings about an article on an old videogame to consider flagging it up at the videogame project before AFD, we
327:
a 1996 game by
Segasoft whose notability I am not questioning. Google Obsidian 1986 and the sources that turn up are exceedingly poor, so this is a valid nom.. Maybe this is because it was pre-Internet when released so sources may be in magazines.. ♦
281:- search on 1997 with keyword obsidian - they did win three times for their marketing. Article can grow a ton - especially when you include their award winning marketing campaign. I am pretty confident notability is now established.
171:
73:
323:
Is there more than one game with the same name? If so please cite reliable sources and demonstrate that these are actually notable games by adding to them. It would seem Turlo s referring to
446:
165:
127:
257:
291:
Striking commentary because it is for a different game as stated below. (However, adding notes to other pages talk page,as there is plenty that can be added to existing)
231:
100:
95:
104:
434:
256:- First, Ive noticed a technical error - it came out in 1996, not 1986. That's the problem with no references. However, I strongly believe they are out there:
382:, an original release and another when the game was published on budget label Americana, so there are at least 3 magazine sources out there. I don't believe
87:
464:
186:
153:
452:
440:
17:
478:
147:
91:
481:
418:
397:
369:
334:
316:
300:
246:
217:
143:
57:
362:, which scraped notability in terms of multiple reliable sources, I'll see if I can find one of the mags scanned online.
497:
36:
193:
132:
83:
63:
415:
394:
366:
313:
242:
496:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
458:
159:
329:
324:
296:
286:
212:
412:
391:
363:
310:
238:
179:
347:
278:
wins and "a permanent feature on the New York Museum of Modern Art". This can be proven here
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
292:
282:
266:
358:
263:
53:
121:
275:
269:
260:
203:
Questionable notability, doesn't seem to be a lot of reliable sources on it.
49:
390:
s have been and I've located and used their review to expand the article.
272:
279:
352:
259:- Proof game is still sold (14 years later is a bit impressive),
490:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
274:- interesting analysis on its commercial campaign, indicating 3
471:
386:
has been scanned onto the net, but the complete set of
117:
113:
109:
178:
192:
268:- Review (but having problem accessing at work),
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
500:). No further edits should be made to this page.
74:Articles for deletion/Obsidian (1986 video game)
435:list of video game related deletion discussions
8:
309:Er, no, that's a completely different game.
406:I did manage to get hold of both issues of
48:Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure)
232:list of Games-related deletion discussions
226:
463:
433:: This debate has been included in the
230:: This debate has been included in the
71:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
70:
469:
24:
378:In fact there are two reviews in
457:
289:) 20:23, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
1:
482:12:53, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
451:
419:02:35, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
398:22:01, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
370:20:58, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
335:21:02, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
317:20:56, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
301:21:15, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
247:19:03, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
218:18:31, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
58:14:29, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
445:
439:
517:
84:Obsidian (1986 video game)
64:Obsidian (1986 video game)
493:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
479:Reach Out to the Truth
69:AfDs for this article:
325:Obsidian (video game)
44:The result was
484:
249:
235:
508:
495:
476:
475:
474:
467:
461:
455:
449:
443:
429:
411:know our stuff.
332:
236:
215:
197:
196:
182:
135:
125:
107:
34:
516:
515:
511:
510:
509:
507:
506:
505:
504:
498:deletion review
491:
470:
438:
330:
239:Jclemens-public
213:
139:
131:
98:
82:
79:
67:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
514:
512:
503:
502:
486:
485:
426:
425:
424:
423:
422:
421:
401:
400:
388:Amstrad Action
373:
372:
359:Amstrad Action
340:
339:
338:
337:
320:
319:
304:
303:
250:
223:
222:
221:
220:
200:
199:
136:
133:Afd statistics
78:
77:
76:
68:
66:
61:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
513:
501:
499:
494:
488:
487:
483:
480:
473:
466:
460:
454:
448:
442:
436:
432:
428:
427:
420:
417:
414:
409:
405:
404:
403:
402:
399:
396:
393:
389:
385:
381:
377:
376:
375:
374:
371:
368:
365:
361:
360:
355:
354:
349:
346:The game was
345:
342:
341:
336:
333:
326:
322:
321:
318:
315:
312:
308:
307:
306:
305:
302:
298:
294:
290:
288:
284:
280:
277:
273:
270:
267:
264:
261:
258:
255:
251:
248:
244:
240:
233:
229:
225:
224:
219:
216:
209:
208:
207:
206:
205:
204:
195:
191:
188:
185:
181:
177:
173:
170:
167:
164:
161:
158:
155:
152:
149:
145:
142:
141:Find sources:
137:
134:
129:
123:
119:
115:
111:
106:
102:
97:
93:
89:
85:
81:
80:
75:
72:
65:
62:
60:
59:
55:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
492:
489:
430:
407:
387:
383:
379:
357:
351:
343:
253:
252:
227:
202:
201:
189:
183:
175:
168:
162:
156:
150:
140:
45:
43:
31:
28:
331:Dr. Blofeld
293:Turlo Lomon
283:Turlo Lomon
276:Clio awards
254:Strong Keep
214:Dr. Blofeld
166:free images
271:- review,
265:- review,
262:- review,
350:in both
348:reviewed
128:View log
416:another
413:Someone
395:another
392:Someone
367:another
364:Someone
314:another
311:Someone
172:WP refs
160:scholar
101:protect
96:history
408:Amtix!
144:Google
105:delete
384:Amtix
380:Amtix
353:Amtix
187:JSTOR
148:books
130:) •
122:views
114:watch
110:links
46:Keep.
16:<
472:Talk
431:Note
356:and
344:Keep
297:talk
287:talk
243:talk
228:Note
180:FENS
154:news
118:logs
92:talk
88:edit
54:talk
50:Whpq
437:. (
237:--
194:TWL
126:– (
477:)
465:RS
299:)
245:)
234:.
174:)
120:|
116:|
112:|
108:|
103:|
99:|
94:|
90:|
56:)
468:·
462:·
459:S
456:·
453:B
450:·
447:N
444:·
441:G
295:(
285:(
241:(
198:)
190:·
184:·
176:·
169:·
163:·
157:·
151:·
146:(
138:(
124:)
86:(
52:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.