274:. But this trend of nominating articles for deletion the same day of creation (in one instance that I have noted, a mere two minutes after creation) should be nipped in the bud. Another user (I can't remember who, now) commented that when articles are new is the time that users are able to catch them, before they get lost in the shuffle. I say, if you think an article isn't going to amount to much based on its first save, make a note of it on a list somewhere, and come back in a month. Don't nominate it for deletion because you're too lazy to come back later. . . . I mean no disrespect to the nominator in this particular discussion. I'm just feeling irritable about the trend. ββ
223:- I have read the article's history page. It was created today, nominated for speedy delete a couple hours later, the speedy delete was contested by the author who promised he would add references, and then brought here to Afd yet a few hours later. I find 0 ghits for the graphic novel "Donnie's Adventures" and 0 ghits for "octo-sloth", so I vote for delete. However, this has all been a bit rapid, hasn't it?
258:
117:
292:- let me be the first to stand beside you in front of the firing squad - I agree totally. This particular article certainly merited a speedy delete, though.
17:
242:- okay, the above person was the contester of the speedy delete. If he's now changed his position, can it now be speedy-deleted?
90:
85:
94:
313:
36:
293:
243:
224:
77:
255:
233:
171:
312:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
146:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
254:- Yes. I've decided that your right and the occto-sloth does not merit a wikipedia page of it's own. Sorry
296:
284:
246:
227:
211:
185:
162:
150:
128:
81:
142:
182:
125:
73:
65:
281:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
271:
196:
138:
276:
178:
159:
111:
195:
Unnecessary; an entire guideline has been dedicated to these such occurrences (
200:
54:
124:
Does not seem notable. Was nominated for speedy deletion and then contested.
306:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
158:
per
Stephen who found the shortcut faster than myself. --
107:
103:
99:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
316:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
177:Uhh...I think you need to review
1:
270:. Okay, so this article was
333:
297:18:50, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
285:04:45, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
259:17:51, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
247:17:31, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
228:22:41, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
212:22:41, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
186:22:38, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
163:22:01, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
151:21:55, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
129:21:38, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
272:made up in school one day
309:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
294:AllGloryToTheHypnotoad
244:AllGloryToTheHypnotoad
225:AllGloryToTheHypnotoad
174:22:35, 13 March 2007
236:7:30, 14 March 2007
232:Ah fine. Delete it.
256:Slippery Jim D'Griz
234:Slippery Jim D'Griz
172:Slippery Jim D'Griz
59:
58:2007-03-17 08:54Z
324:
311:
209:
206:
203:
115:
97:
61:
57:
50:
34:
332:
331:
327:
326:
325:
323:
322:
321:
320:
314:deletion review
307:
207:
204:
201:
88:
72:
69:
51:
45:
44:The result was
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
330:
328:
319:
318:
302:
301:
300:
299:
265:
264:
263:
262:
261:
249:
214:
190:
189:
188:
165:
153:
143:Stephen Turner
122:
121:
68:
63:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
329:
317:
315:
310:
304:
303:
298:
295:
291:
288:
287:
286:
283:
279:
278:
273:
269:
266:
260:
257:
253:
250:
248:
245:
241:
238:
237:
235:
231:
230:
229:
226:
222:
218:
215:
213:
210:
198:
194:
191:
187:
184:
183:Hondasaregood
180:
176:
175:
173:
169:
166:
164:
161:
157:
154:
152:
148:
144:
140:
136:
133:
132:
131:
130:
127:
126:Hondasaregood
119:
113:
109:
105:
101:
96:
92:
87:
83:
79:
75:
71:
70:
67:
64:
62:
60:
56:
48:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
308:
305:
289:
275:
267:
251:
239:
220:
216:
192:
167:
155:
134:
123:
52:
46:
43:
31:
28:
74:Octo-sloth
66:Octo-sloth
277:Carolfrog
170:Why not?
160:Tikiwont
118:View log
290:comment
268:Comment
252:comment
240:comment
221:comment
91:protect
86:history
217:delete
197:WP:NFT
193:Delete
156:Delete
139:WP:NFT
135:Delete
95:delete
47:Delete
282:β¦ΡΠΎΡβ¦
112:views
104:watch
100:links
55:Quarl
16:<
219:and
179:WP:N
168:Save
147:Talk
137:per
108:logs
82:talk
78:edit
116:β (
280:ββ
208:77
205:SR
199:)
149:)
141:.
110:|
106:|
102:|
98:|
93:|
89:|
84:|
80:|
202:N
181:.
145:(
120:)
114:)
76:(
53:β
49:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.