215:
The Google News sources might be worth looking into, but the existing sources (which are great to verify facts) are not the sort of sources to establish notability because the organizations doing the reporting there list pretty much any virus they find in their database, regardless of how much
243:) just about seem to get this over the notability bar. I say "reluctant" because I do rather despair that trivial geekery like this always gets people weighing in with "keeps", but I have to fight hard to get
268:. There are very few virus hoaxes already and plenty of sites covering them - the standard for news stories is *much* higher. If we're not having crimes with international coverage like
194:
mentions that this hoax made the rounds twice in one year, and caused a loss of productivity. Multiple independent sources written specifically about the topic...that meets
120:
87:
82:
91:
216:
effects it actually had. (Just like IMDB doesn't help to establish notability for actors or films because they list anything they can get their hands on) =
74:
244:
54:
17:
189:
247:
kept, and even then it's only a "no consensus". I know that that's irrelevant to this article, but I had to get it off my chest.
289:
256:
223:
207:
180:
154:
136:
56:
304:
36:
78:
145:. Article has 3 reliable sources describing the hoax. I'm not sure why this doesn't qualify as notable, therefore.
269:
265:
70:
62:
303:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
170:
hoaxes are acceptable, and this definitely reads like an article about a notable hoax covered by 3 independent
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
272:
included then we don't need to go out of our way to keep this sort of wikicruft around. Accordingly I'd cite
221:
195:
285:
252:
52:
245:
an article about a town where people live out their whole lives and which has coverage in over 100 books
273:
132:
232:
217:
281:
248:
231:. The sources in the article are certainly not sufficent to justify keeping this article, per
49:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
277:
163:
203:
150:
176:
171:
128:
192:
108:
199:
146:
127:
This article does not establish notability of the subject of the article.
235:, but two of the articles in the Google News search linked by Cazort (
297:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
115:
104:
100:
96:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
307:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
1:
266:Knowledge (XXG):NOTDIRECTORY
324:
270:YouTube cat abuse incident
71:Olympic Torch (virus hoax)
63:Olympic Torch (virus hoax)
57:02:46, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
290:14:26, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
257:23:34, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
224:11:47, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
208:22:19, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
181:20:24, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
155:16:10, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
137:14:03, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
300:Please do not modify it.
280:because it's ephemeral.
32:Please do not modify it.
229:Weak reluctant keep
276:too, specifically
44:The result was
237:The Indian Expess
315:
302:
179:
172:reliable sources
118:
112:
94:
34:
323:
322:
318:
317:
316:
314:
313:
312:
311:
305:deletion review
298:
175:
114:
85:
69:
66:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
321:
319:
310:
309:
293:
292:
259:
241:Wiener Zeitung
226:
210:
183:
157:
125:
124:
65:
60:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
320:
308:
306:
301:
295:
294:
291:
287:
283:
279:
275:
271:
267:
263:
262:Strong Delete
260:
258:
254:
250:
246:
242:
238:
234:
230:
227:
225:
222:
219:
214:
211:
209:
205:
201:
197:
196:WP:Notability
193:
191:This source:
190:
187:
184:
182:
178:
173:
169:
165:
161:
158:
156:
152:
148:
144:
141:
140:
139:
138:
134:
130:
122:
117:
110:
106:
102:
98:
93:
89:
84:
80:
76:
72:
68:
67:
64:
61:
59:
58:
55:
53:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
299:
296:
282:WikiScrubber
261:
249:Phil Bridger
240:
236:
228:
212:
188:. Sources:
185:
167:
159:
142:
126:
50:Juliancolton
45:
43:
31:
28:
166:, articles
274:WP:NOTNEWS
177:KuyaBriBri
233:WP:NOTDIR
129:Unionsoap
121:View log
278:WP:SBST
213:Comment
164:WP:HOAX
88:protect
83:history
200:Cazort
147:JulesH
116:delete
92:delete
168:about
160:Keep.
119:) – (
109:views
101:watch
97:links
16:<
286:talk
253:talk
239:and
204:talk
186:Keep
162:Per
151:talk
143:Keep
133:talk
105:logs
79:talk
75:edit
46:keep
218:Mgm
198:.
48:. –
288:)
264:.
255:)
206:)
174:.
153:)
135:)
107:|
103:|
99:|
95:|
90:|
86:|
81:|
77:|
284:(
251:(
220:|
202:(
149:(
131:(
123:)
113:(
111:)
73:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.