266:- Not notable; A news search produces only a single Knowledge-compliant reliable source, and that source asserts more speculation than fact at this time. If a significant story should develop around this subject, then it could be mentioned in an existing, related article. If it should then become notable enough to meet Knowledge's
246:
There is no information I've seen that says this operation involved gunwalking, which makes it different from the operations in that article. It was more of a typical sting where an unknown number of guns (1? 50?) may have been lost. I'm not sure it belongs there at all, but certainly no more than a
193:
criteria. There is no depth of coverage: the only source of substance is an article in the LA Times. All other citations in the article are pages with brief mentions that link to the LAT as their source. A Google search showed me only one other (brief) mention of the subject from May. No duration of
158:
288:
194:
coverage and no diversity of sources. Editors with some knowledge of the topic may agree that, beyond subtext, there is no evidence that the subject is anything except a routine event. Aspects of
152:
119:
211:
To clarify, the Google search I refer to concerns a Google news search for original information, not a general search which reveals sites using the LAT article as a source.
332:
228:
I would support a mergeto the gunwalking scandal article, as was done with the fast and furious, while allowing for recreation if future coverage increases.
310:
92:
87:
96:
79:
173:
140:
17:
134:
57:
369:
346:
324:
302:
279:
254:
237:
218:
205:
61:
388:
40:
130:
83:
180:
75:
67:
384:
275:
53:
36:
166:
247:
couple of sentences saying that it was looked at in the course of a congressional investigation.
233:
146:
342:
320:
298:
267:
251:
215:
202:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
383:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
271:
195:
190:
365:
229:
338:
316:
294:
248:
212:
199:
113:
358:
357:
as per
Xenophrenic. We don't need an article for each newspaper story. --
52:. Recretion is possible if more turns up in independent reliable sources
377:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
289:
list of United States of
America-related deletion discussions
109:
105:
101:
165:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
391:). No further edits should be made to this page.
270:requirements, an article can be created for it.
179:
8:
331:Note: This debate has been included in the
309:Note: This debate has been included in the
287:Note: This debate has been included in the
333:list of Crime-related deletion discussions
330:
308:
286:
311:list of Law-related deletion discussions
7:
24:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
370:14:54, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
347:00:19, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
325:00:19, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
303:00:18, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
280:03:06, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
255:16:34, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
238:22:36, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
219:22:33, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
206:22:20, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
62:10:37, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
408:
380:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
226:article creator : merge
189:Subject does not meet
76:Operation White Gun
68:Operation White Gun
48:The result was
368:
349:
336:
327:
314:
305:
292:
399:
382:
364:
337:
315:
293:
184:
183:
169:
117:
99:
54:Martijn Hoekstra
34:
407:
406:
402:
401:
400:
398:
397:
396:
395:
389:deletion review
378:
126:
90:
74:
71:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
405:
403:
394:
393:
373:
372:
351:
350:
328:
306:
283:
282:
260:
259:
258:
257:
241:
240:
222:
221:
187:
186:
123:
70:
65:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
404:
392:
390:
386:
381:
375:
374:
371:
367:
362:
361:
356:
353:
352:
348:
344:
340:
334:
329:
326:
322:
318:
312:
307:
304:
300:
296:
290:
285:
284:
281:
277:
273:
269:
265:
262:
261:
256:
253:
250:
245:
244:
243:
242:
239:
235:
231:
227:
224:
223:
220:
217:
214:
210:
209:
208:
207:
204:
201:
197:
192:
182:
178:
175:
172:
168:
164:
160:
157:
154:
151:
148:
145:
142:
139:
136:
132:
129:
128:Find sources:
124:
121:
115:
111:
107:
103:
98:
94:
89:
85:
81:
77:
73:
72:
69:
66:
64:
63:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
379:
376:
359:
354:
263:
225:
198:also apply.
188:
176:
170:
162:
155:
149:
143:
137:
127:
49:
47:
31:
28:
272:Xenophrenic
153:free images
268:notability
385:talk page
339:• Gene93k
317:• Gene93k
295:• Gene93k
196:WP:RECENT
37:talk page
387:or in a
230:Gaijin42
191:WP:EVENT
120:View log
39:or in a
360:P 1 9 9
159:WP refs
147:scholar
93:protect
88:history
355:Delete
264:Delete
131:Google
97:delete
50:delete
174:JSTOR
135:books
114:views
106:watch
102:links
16:<
366:TALK
343:talk
321:talk
299:talk
276:talk
249:hɑzʎ
234:talk
213:hɑzʎ
200:hɑzʎ
167:FENS
141:news
110:logs
84:talk
80:edit
58:talk
252:ɗɑƞ
216:ɗɑƞ
203:ɗɑƞ
181:TWL
118:– (
363:•
345:)
335:.
323:)
313:.
301:)
291:.
278:)
236:)
161:)
112:|
108:|
104:|
100:|
95:|
91:|
86:|
82:|
60:)
341:(
319:(
297:(
274:(
232:(
185:)
177:·
171:·
163:·
156:·
150:·
144:·
138:·
133:(
125:(
122:)
116:)
78:(
56:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.