458:. The protests aren't just related to the railway line, but to the development of Hong Kong's democracy, and as such will likely stand on their own even years from now; and there are enough sources to warrant an article on significance. The railway line, once built, will have technical features to report and will gain an operational history, thus I'm sure that that article will expand significantly in the (near) future. --
324:
on undertaking certain actions, and quite right too. On looking back, the protests are already a part of the history of the development of the rail project. I had intended to merge these for some time, but I often like to leave things for a while, so as not to stifle article development. Luckily,
162:
96:
91:
100:
83:
156:
378:. A development project and opposition to it belong in the same encyclopedia article. They are more tightly coupled than the examples given above of incidents at the location unrelated to its construction.
205:
260:
for that same reason. The rail link protests are intimately linked to the construction of the project itself, and to my mind is well within the scope of the latter. Integration makes perfect sense. --
87:
208:. The two are closely intertwined, and the protests must be viewed in context of the project. What is more, the target page is only 21k after merger, which makes for a more complete article.
475:
as this discussion is in the wrong place. Merging is an editorial decision that doesn't require an administrator to hit the "delete" button, so should be discussed on the article talk page.
79:
71:
226:- Historic events should always be separate articles whenever possible. Any event with its own name, and of this scale should be its own article. Is the same reason we don't merge
123:
252:
bad example, I'm afraid. Temporally, the bridge was built in the 12th century, and the incident occurred at the former in the 20th century. One wouldn't even contemplate merging
353:
177:
144:
484:
467:
448:
415:
387:
367:
337:
315:
289:
268:
243:
216:
65:
138:
134:
184:
306:. So why does this event not deserve its own article? Ohconfucius should also point out why a merge now, a full year after the event.
150:
17:
253:
403:
53:
395:
299:
257:
499:
36:
438:
363:
227:
383:
498:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
402:. So why is a Construction incident a reason to automatically merge it with a train stop article? This has
321:
480:
463:
359:
285:
335:
266:
214:
444:
379:
326:
170:
411:
311:
239:
476:
459:
281:
231:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
280:
seems obvious to me. If possible both sides of a controversy should be in the same article.
330:
261:
209:
434:
399:
303:
61:
49:
407:
307:
235:
329:
of each other. I really don't see a rationale for keeping them apart any longer. --
117:
427:
57:
325:
probably because of the low traffic/interest, the articles have not become
298:
Please suggest why it is obvious. We are at the point where we have
206:
Guangzhou-Shenzhen-Hong Kong
Express Rail Link Hong Kong Section
492:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
331:
262:
210:
394:
There is no WP rule that suggest that. Deconstruction (
201:
113:
109:
105:
80:
Opposition to the
Guangzhou-Hong Kong Express Rail Link
72:
Opposition to the
Guangzhou-Hong Kong Express Rail Link
169:
320:
It is indeed now a year since the incident. There is
183:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
502:). No further edits should be made to this page.
354:list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions
8:
404:notability and is not an unnecessary split
348:
352:: This debate has been included in the
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
398:) is not a reason to merge it with
24:
254:2008 Beijing Drum Tower stabbings
1:
396:Bankruptcy of Lehman Brothers
300:Bankruptcy of Lehman Brothers
485:00:46, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
468:12:51, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
449:10:56, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
416:04:25, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
388:15:54, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
368:11:22, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
338:09:24, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
316:09:04, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
290:08:40, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
269:09:57, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
258:Gulou and Zhonglou (Beijing)
244:08:10, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
217:07:49, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
66:00:20, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
48:. This can be brought up at
519:
228:Marco Polo Bridge Incident
495:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
302:a separate article as
44:The result was
447:
425:per Ohconfucius.
370:
357:
232:Marco Polo Bridge
54:non-admin closure
510:
497:
443:
441:
430:
358:
333:
264:
212:
188:
187:
173:
121:
103:
50:Proposed mergers
34:
518:
517:
513:
512:
511:
509:
508:
507:
506:
500:deletion review
493:
439:
428:
400:Lehman Brothers
380:Jonathanwallace
304:Lehman Brothers
130:
94:
78:
75:
64:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
516:
514:
505:
504:
488:
487:
470:
452:
451:
419:
418:
391:
390:
372:
371:
345:
344:
343:
342:
341:
340:
293:
292:
274:
273:
272:
271:
247:
246:
220:
219:
204:page merge to
193:
191:
190:
127:
74:
69:
60:
52:. Not here. (
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
515:
503:
501:
496:
490:
489:
486:
482:
478:
474:
471:
469:
465:
461:
457:
454:
453:
450:
446:
442:
437:
436:
432:
431:
424:
421:
420:
417:
413:
409:
405:
401:
397:
393:
392:
389:
385:
381:
377:
374:
373:
369:
365:
361:
355:
351:
347:
346:
339:
336:
334:
328:
323:
322:no time limit
319:
318:
317:
313:
309:
305:
301:
297:
296:
295:
294:
291:
287:
283:
279:
276:
275:
270:
267:
265:
259:
255:
251:
250:
249:
248:
245:
241:
237:
233:
229:
225:
222:
221:
218:
215:
213:
207:
203:
199:
196:
195:
194:
186:
182:
179:
176:
172:
168:
164:
161:
158:
155:
152:
149:
146:
143:
140:
136:
133:
132:Find sources:
128:
125:
119:
115:
111:
107:
102:
98:
93:
89:
85:
81:
77:
76:
73:
70:
68:
67:
63:
59:
55:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
494:
491:
477:Phil Bridger
473:Speedy close
472:
460:Rontombontom
455:
433:
426:
422:
375:
349:
282:Steve Dufour
277:
223:
197:
192:
180:
174:
166:
159:
153:
147:
141:
131:
45:
43:
31:
28:
332:Ohconfucius
263:Ohconfucius
211:Ohconfucius
157:free images
327:POV forks
456:No merge
408:Benjwong
308:Benjwong
236:Benjwong
224:No merge
202:Disputed
124:View log
163:WP refs
151:scholar
97:protect
92:history
435:Voting
429:Kayau
135:Google
101:delete
423:Merge
376:Merge
278:Merge
256:into
230:with
198:Merge
178:JSTOR
139:books
118:views
110:watch
106:links
58:Logan
46:close
16:<
481:talk
464:talk
445:evil
412:talk
384:talk
364:call
350:Note
312:talk
286:talk
240:talk
171:FENS
145:news
114:logs
88:talk
84:edit
62:Talk
360:cab
185:TWL
122:– (
483:)
466:)
440:IS
414:)
406:.
386:)
366:)
356:.
314:)
288:)
242:)
234:.
200:-
165:)
116:|
112:|
108:|
104:|
99:|
95:|
90:|
86:|
56:)
479:(
462:(
410:(
382:(
362:(
310:(
284:(
238:(
189:)
181:·
175:·
167:·
160:·
154:·
148:·
142:·
137:(
129:(
126:)
120:)
82:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.