194:
OK, you're right strictly speaking, but since he's essentially presenting himself in his professional capacity as a (presumably paid) musician providing entertainment services, I could also see us applying db-spam
68:
rewritten article a useful addition. Originally nominated for speedy deletion under CSD-A7, the above stopped me from deleting it but also stopped me from just keeping it. Opinions, please.
311:
I support deletion, but it should be noted that per WP:COI, "an author's conflict of interest by itself is not a basis for deletion".
17:
299:
225:. This is a person, and he asserts notability under our existing rules. This could be false, or not enough, but it is an
170:. This is a person, and he asserts notability under our existing rules. This could be false, or not enough, but it is an
417:
36:
416:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
144:, so tagged. Someone who cares, and who is not Oscar Bianchi, can then do the rewrite Bucketsofg is proposing.
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
287:
64:
Terrible, embarrassing, self-penned vanity. But lots of claims of notability, which, if true, would make a
402:
366:
339:
315:
257:
240:
203:
185:
148:
126:
92:
79:
52:
295:
383:
101:
325:
329:
230:
175:
69:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
391:
359:
280:
352:
219:
164:
138:
276:
275:. Lots of vanity, article created by a user with the same name as the article, so it meets
291:
109:
105:
387:
362:("Advertisements masquerading as articles"), if that's not clear from my above comment.
363:
312:
254:
253:
read what you wrote the first time around. No point in wasting precious bytes here :-)
200:
145:
89:
49:
395:
58:
333:
234:
179:
73:
399:
279:. If it's really relevant, let's have other people write the article from a
382:; it's not clear to me that the Gaudeamus prize is sufficient to meet
229:
of notability as we require. Not a speedy delete and tag removed.
174:
of notability as we require. Not a speedy delete and tag removed.
410:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
215:
Not a company, product, group or service as stated by
199:. That's exactly the sort of text it was created for.
160:
Not a company, product, group or service as stated by
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
420:). No further edits should be made to this page.
386:, and in any case the article has problems with
324:So your reason for deletion (he says, playing
8:
104:, I think: among other things he's won a
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
88:Reads like a magazine vanity piece.
24:
44:The result of the debate was to
100:, stub and rewrite. He meets
1:
403:04:02, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
367:21:11, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
340:21:05, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
316:20:58, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
258:21:11, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
241:21:05, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
204:20:55, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
186:20:43, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
149:20:27, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
127:21:36, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
93:21:32, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
80:21:04, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
53:11:39, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
437:
249:... Er, yes, thank you, I
413:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
304:
290:comment added by
428:
415:
357:
351:
336:
328:), would be...?
326:Devil's advocate
303:
284:
237:
224:
218:
182:
169:
163:
143:
137:
124:
118:
114:
76:
34:
436:
435:
431:
430:
429:
427:
426:
425:
424:
418:deletion review
411:
355:
349:
334:
285:
235:
222:
216:
180:
167:
161:
141:
135:
120:
116:
110:
106:Gaudeamus_Prize
74:
62:
48:the article. --
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
434:
432:
423:
422:
406:
405:
376:
375:
374:
373:
372:
371:
370:
369:
343:
342:
319:
318:
306:
305:
269:
268:
267:
266:
265:
264:
263:
262:
261:
260:
244:
243:
207:
206:
189:
188:
152:
151:
129:
95:
61:
56:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
433:
421:
419:
414:
408:
407:
404:
401:
397:
393:
389:
385:
381:
378:
377:
368:
365:
361:
354:
347:
346:
345:
344:
341:
338:
337:
331:
327:
323:
322:
321:
320:
317:
314:
310:
309:
308:
307:
301:
297:
293:
289:
282:
278:
274:
271:
270:
259:
256:
252:
248:
247:
246:
245:
242:
239:
238:
232:
228:
221:
214:
211:
210:
209:
208:
205:
202:
198:
197:per analogiam
193:
192:
191:
190:
187:
184:
183:
177:
173:
166:
159:
156:
155:
154:
153:
150:
147:
140:
133:
132:Speedy delete
130:
128:
125:
123:
119:
113:
107:
103:
99:
96:
94:
91:
87:
84:
83:
82:
81:
78:
77:
71:
67:
66:substantially
60:
59:Oscar Bianchi
57:
55:
54:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
412:
409:
379:
332:
286:— Preceding
272:
250:
233:
226:
212:
196:
178:
171:
157:
131:
121:
115:
111:
97:
85:
72:
65:
63:
45:
43:
31:
28:
292:Dockingman
50:Konst.able
364:Sandstein
313:Sandstein
255:Sandstein
227:assertion
201:Sandstein
172:assertion
146:Sandstein
90:ReverendG
384:WP:MUSIC
348:... per
300:contribs
288:unsigned
102:WP:MUSIC
392:WP:NPOV
360:WP:SPAM
353:db-spam
335:ЯEDVERS
281:WP:NPOV
236:ЯEDVERS
220:db-spam
213:Comment
181:ЯEDVERS
165:db-spam
158:Comment
139:db-spam
75:ЯEDVERS
400:Vectro
394:, and
380:Delete
277:WP:COI
273:Delete
86:Delete
46:Delete
388:WP:RS
16:<
396:WP:V
296:talk
134:per
112:Buck
98:Keep
358:or
251:did
122:ofg
117:ets
108:.
398:.
390:,
356:}}
350:{{
330:➨
302:)
298:•
283:.
231:➨
223:}}
217:{{
176:➨
168:}}
162:{{
142:}}
136:{{
70:➨
294:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.