367:
in reliable sources about his revelations and his dismissal. However, the article states as fact that he was fired for his whistle blowing, which is his claim but is strongly denied by the hospital. His books seem notable enough (reviewed at BMJ for example) so I would leave them alone. Note that he
260:
the books. The whistleblowing stuff is of national interest - that's why there are references from the
Guardian and Daily Mail, and there are a few more online if you look. However, all the personal stuff is irrelevant and the books not notable.
181:
290:
Because the issue of whistle blowing in the NHS is controversial and timely - try searching Google for articles in the BMJ about whistleblowing (sorry, would post links but don't have the time right now).
212:
Biography of radiologist in London, known mainly for the fact that he was sacked after whistleblowing. Of local interest only, wrote two books, no other claims to notability.
136:
313:
175:
364:
339:
368:
is the editor of the books, not the author. The information about his personal life does not belong in the book articles and I will remove it. --
141:
17:
109:
104:
196:
113:
163:
49:
229:
96:
415:
Plenty of primary and secondary sources available to establish notability. Whistleblowers are few and far between.
233:
456:
275:
Why was the whistleblowing of national interest, considering he only spoke out on the practices of one hospital?
36:
455:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
157:
420:
400:
153:
441:
424:
404:
377:
354:
328:
299:
285:
270:
246:
222:
78:
189:
373:
295:
280:
266:
241:
217:
203:
437:
350:
324:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
416:
396:
387:
74:
169:
100:
369:
291:
276:
262:
237:
213:
433:
346:
320:
130:
54:
92:
84:
390:
to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
449:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
126:
122:
118:
188:
395:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
236:authored by the subject. Should they be included?
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
459:). No further edits should be made to this page.
432:- well-sourced and had plenty of news coverage.
363:but evaluate for neutrality. There is a ton of
314:list of Medicine-related deletion discussions
202:
8:
340:list of Authors-related deletion discussions
334:
308:
338:: This debate has been included in the
312:: This debate has been included in the
7:
24:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
228:Note: same user also created
79:16:18, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
234:Ultrasound in Emergency Care
442:13:17, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
425:19:45, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
405:00:02, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
378:14:39, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
355:00:45, 21 August 2010 (UTC)
329:00:45, 21 August 2010 (UTC)
300:19:50, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
286:23:47, 21 August 2010 (UTC)
271:17:24, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
247:15:04, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
223:14:57, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
476:
230:ABC of Emergency Radiology
452:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
44:The result was
407:
357:
343:
331:
317:
283:
244:
220:
50:non-admin closure
467:
454:
394:
392:
344:
318:
281:
242:
218:
207:
206:
192:
144:
134:
116:
77:
72:
69:
66:
63:
60:
57:
34:
475:
474:
470:
469:
468:
466:
465:
464:
463:
457:deletion review
450:
385:
149:
140:
107:
91:
88:
70:
67:
64:
61:
58:
55:
53:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
473:
471:
462:
461:
445:
444:
427:
409:
408:
393:
382:
381:
380:
358:
332:
306:
305:
304:
303:
302:
250:
249:
210:
209:
146:
142:AfD statistics
87:
82:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
472:
460:
458:
453:
447:
446:
443:
439:
435:
431:
428:
426:
422:
418:
414:
411:
410:
406:
402:
398:
391:
389:
384:
383:
379:
375:
371:
366:
365:news coverage
362:
359:
356:
352:
348:
341:
337:
333:
330:
326:
322:
315:
311:
307:
301:
297:
293:
289:
288:
287:
284:
278:
274:
273:
272:
268:
264:
259:
255:
252:
251:
248:
245:
239:
235:
231:
227:
226:
225:
224:
221:
215:
205:
201:
198:
195:
191:
187:
183:
180:
177:
174:
171:
168:
165:
162:
159:
155:
152:
151:Find sources:
147:
143:
138:
132:
128:
124:
120:
115:
111:
106:
102:
98:
94:
90:
89:
86:
83:
81:
80:
76:
73:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
451:
448:
429:
412:
386:
360:
335:
309:
257:
253:
211:
199:
193:
185:
178:
172:
166:
160:
150:
45:
43:
31:
28:
417:scope_creep
413:Strong Keep
397:Ron Ritzman
176:free images
347:• Gene93k
321:• Gene93k
93:Otto Chan
85:Otto Chan
388:Relisted
370:MelanieN
137:View log
434:Bearian
182:WP refs
170:scholar
110:protect
105:history
258:delete
154:Google
114:delete
292:Chris
263:Chris
197:JSTOR
158:books
131:views
123:watch
119:links
16:<
438:talk
430:Keep
421:talk
401:talk
374:talk
361:Keep
351:talk
336:Note
325:talk
310:Note
296:talk
282:T@lk
267:talk
256:but
254:Keep
243:T@lk
232:and
219:T@lk
190:FENS
164:news
127:logs
101:talk
97:edit
75:chat
46:keep
345:--
319:--
277:JFW
238:JFW
214:JFW
204:TWL
139:•
135:– (
48:. (
440:)
423:)
403:)
376:)
353:)
342:.
327:)
316:.
298:)
279:|
269:)
240:|
216:|
184:)
129:|
125:|
121:|
117:|
112:|
108:|
103:|
99:|
52:)
436:(
419:(
399:(
372:(
349:(
323:(
294:(
265:(
208:)
200:·
194:·
186:·
179:·
173:·
167:·
161:·
156:(
148:(
145:)
133:)
95:(
71:3
68:8
65:F
62:J
59:T
56:C
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.