542:). With respect to what the navigation systems have to offer, different readers prefer different styles of browsing. The lists (and outlines) appeal to some users of Knowledge, while the nav boxes and categories appeal to others. Well developed lists (including outlines) generally have more features than categories and nav boxes, and are much easier and faster to edit. But before you can have a great list, you must initially have a rudimentary list. Also keep in mind that some editors who are navigation system builders prefer to work almost entirely on the list navigation system (such as myself). For some examples among the best outlines, please take a look at
500:- I just noticed this deletion discussion just now, and have not had time to work on this article to show those in the discussion what it can become. Please re-list this to give me a few days so I can work on it. Right now, this is a work-in-progress, and it is no where near complete. "Outline" is short for "hierarchical outline", and such outlines arrange topics in a
534:) was developed to keep the list system (which includes the outlines) from being hacked to pieces at deletion discussions, which has come to be seen as counter productive, since we have so many editors dedicated to working on lists. (And there are technologies on the horizon that may take list building and maintaining to the next level -- such as
522:, one of Knowledge's long established navigation systems. Note that Knowledge has several somewhat redundant navigation systems, such as categories, navigation boxes, and lists (including outlines). Because each has the potential to leapfrog the others, and since each taps different strengths from various editors, the guideline
570:. Many outlines serve as tables of contents for subjects that are made up of many articles across Knowledge, while some outlines have evolved into classified glossaries (structured lists with annotations). Please allow Narnia to be added to this robust navigation system, as it falls within its scope and mission. Thank you.
614:, an established type of article. Some people like them, others don't. It really would be best if those who don't approve of outlines stop looking at them but if they really pose some underlying problem the matter should be brought up at a policy level.
170:
504:. Some (but not all) of the best ones have annotations to assist with topic selection. The main difference between outlines and other page types is the way they are formatted -- they are a type of
391:
431:
an "Outline of Narnia" is what is provided by the lead section of the existing article. This should have been speedied as an article duplicatg the content of an existinng article.
123:
164:
371:
411:
563:
130:
96:
91:
100:
83:
349:. By their nature, these are not articles - they are another type of navigational aid like lists, categories and templates. Per
185:
17:
152:
330:
230:
245:
Probably needs a significant update to become encyclopaedic but there are many similar articles for other fantasy worlds.
535:
571:
539:
206:
584:
146:
201:
Queried speedy delete. This article looks relevant for readers looking for information about the Narnia scenario.
642:
358:
353:, we don't favour any particular way of doing this and should not delete one type because it duplicates another.
262:
40:
623:
600:
576:
518:
492:
471:
459:
440:
423:
403:
383:
362:
337:
314:
291:
266:
249:
210:
65:
142:
299:
I was going to say that this article would be very well served as a navbox. Then I scrolled to the bottom of
567:
547:
202:
87:
345:
What people seem to need is an understanding of what sort of thing an outline is and for that please see
192:
638:
436:
287:
36:
354:
258:
551:
178:
559:
325:
225:
158:
619:
611:
488:
467:
419:
399:
379:
346:
79:
71:
60:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
637:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
274:. I can see nothing to suggest that this article has anything to add to the existing article
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
555:
543:
530:
432:
283:
512:
307:
506:
501:
480:
455:
524:
350:
320:
220:
615:
594:
484:
463:
415:
395:
375:
246:
54:
217:
I unbulleted your comment for format as you are the nominator, feel free to undo.
117:
587:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
566:. For an example of an outline about a similar entertainment franchise, see
483:, and either a navigation box or a category would work better than this.
300:
275:
631:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
313:). What's in the outline that isn't covered in the navbox seems
392:
list of
Fictional elements-related deletion discussions
113:
109:
105:
177:
257:
The nomination does not specify a reason to delete.
592:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
645:). No further edits should be made to this page.
372:list of Literature-related deletion discussions
516:-alone-list. They are all part of the set at
510:(structured topics list), more specifically a
191:
8:
410:Note: This debate has been included in the
390:Note: This debate has been included in the
370:Note: This debate has been included in the
412:list of Lists-related deletion discussions
409:
389:
369:
564:Outline of motorcycles and motorcycling
7:
24:
454:I speedied it as a duplicate of
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
624:09:06, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
601:04:19, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
577:10:00, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
493:19:41, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
481:nothing more than a bare list
472:19:27, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
441:14:43, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
424:00:43, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
404:00:43, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
384:00:43, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
363:17:33, 12 December 2014 (UTC)
338:17:08, 12 December 2014 (UTC)
292:14:38, 12 December 2014 (UTC)
267:13:08, 12 December 2014 (UTC)
250:11:51, 12 December 2014 (UTC)
211:09:34, 12 December 2014 (UTC)
66:14:36, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
536:automatic taxonomy induction
540:natural language processing
303:and saw a nice big navbox (
662:
278:. "What sort of thing is
634:Please do not modify it.
519:Portal:Contents/Outlines
460:The Chronicles of Narnia
32:Please do not modify it.
568:Outline of Middle-earth
548:Outline of cell biology
462:- my view still stands
479:- currently, this is
552:Outline of Buddhism
560:Outline of Iceland
48:The result was
603:
573:The Transhumanist
426:
406:
386:
315:INDISCRIMINATEish
237:
203:Anthony Appleyard
80:Outline of Narnia
72:Outline of Narnia
653:
636:
597:
591:
589:
556:Outline of Japan
544:Outline of chess
336:
335:
333:
328:
323:
312:
306:
236:
235:
233:
228:
223:
216:
196:
195:
181:
133:
121:
103:
34:
661:
660:
656:
655:
654:
652:
651:
650:
649:
643:deletion review
632:
604:
595:
582:
331:
326:
321:
319:
318:
310:
304:
231:
226:
221:
219:
218:
138:
129:
94:
78:
75:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
659:
657:
648:
647:
627:
626:
590:
581:
580:
579:
538:, a branch of
502:tree structure
495:
474:
456:Narnia (world)
448:
447:
446:
445:
444:
443:
407:
387:
366:
365:
340:
294:
269:
252:
239:
238:
199:
198:
135:
74:
69:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
658:
646:
644:
640:
635:
629:
628:
625:
621:
617:
613:
609:
606:
605:
602:
599:
598:
588:
586:
578:
575:
574:
569:
565:
561:
557:
553:
549:
545:
541:
537:
533:
532:
527:
526:
521:
520:
515:
514:
509:
508:
503:
499:
496:
494:
490:
486:
482:
478:
475:
473:
469:
465:
461:
457:
453:
450:
449:
442:
438:
434:
430:
429:
428:
427:
425:
421:
417:
413:
408:
405:
401:
397:
393:
388:
385:
381:
377:
373:
368:
367:
364:
360:
356:
352:
348:
344:
341:
339:
334:
329:
324:
316:
309:
302:
298:
295:
293:
289:
285:
281:
277:
273:
270:
268:
264:
260:
256:
253:
251:
248:
244:
241:
240:
234:
229:
224:
215:
214:
213:
212:
208:
204:
194:
190:
187:
184:
180:
176:
172:
169:
166:
163:
160:
157:
154:
151:
148:
144:
141:
140:Find sources:
136:
132:
128:
125:
119:
115:
111:
107:
102:
98:
93:
89:
85:
81:
77:
76:
73:
70:
68:
67:
63:
62:
57:
56:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
633:
630:
607:
593:
583:
572:
529:
523:
517:
511:
505:
497:
476:
451:
342:
296:
279:
271:
254:
242:
200:
188:
182:
174:
167:
161:
155:
149:
139:
126:
59:
53:
49:
47:
31:
28:
528:(including
498:Strong Keep
433:TheLongTone
284:TheLongTone
255:Speedy Keep
165:free images
612:WP:OUTLINE
347:WP:OUTLINE
282:" indeed.
639:talk page
531:WP:NOTDUP
416:• Gene93k
396:• Gene93k
376:• Gene93k
355:Andrew D.
259:Andrew D.
243:Weak Keep
37:talk page
641:or in a
610:It's an
585:Relisted
513:WP:STAND
124:View log
39:or in a
616:Thincat
596:MBisanz
507:WP:LIST
485:Bearian
464:Gbawden
343:Comment
297:Delete:
247:Rehnn83
171:WP refs
159:scholar
97:protect
92:history
55:postdlf
562:, and
525:WP:CLN
477:Delete
452:Delete
351:WP:CLN
308:narnia
301:Narnia
280:Narnia
276:Narnia
272:Delete
143:Google
101:delete
186:JSTOR
147:books
131:Stats
118:views
110:watch
106:links
16:<
620:talk
608:Keep
489:talk
468:talk
458:and
437:talk
420:talk
400:talk
380:talk
359:talk
288:talk
263:talk
207:talk
179:FENS
153:news
114:logs
88:talk
84:edit
61:talk
50:keep
332:eef
322:Dea
232:eef
222:Dea
193:TWL
122:– (
622:)
558:,
554:,
550:,
546:,
491:)
470:)
439:)
422:)
414:.
402:)
394:.
382:)
374:.
361:)
327:db
317:.
311:}}
305:{{
290:)
265:)
227:db
209:)
173:)
116:|
112:|
108:|
104:|
99:|
95:|
90:|
86:|
64:)
52:.
618:(
487:(
466:(
435:(
418:(
398:(
378:(
357:(
286:(
261:(
205:(
197:)
189:·
183:·
175:·
168:·
162:·
156:·
150:·
145:(
137:(
134:)
127:·
120:)
82:(
58:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.