225:, claiming that there was no evidence that the creator invented the cocktail. I removed the Prod and provided the web search reasoning for the speedy delete nomination. I provided further reasoning to McGeddon on my talk page, writing that the A11 policy extended to "discoveries" in "pubs" too, as per the exact wordings in the policy. Post that, an administrator
217:
so-named drink may have been discovered or invented by the author in a pub (say). The A11 criteria mentions that the tag can be placed on an article that "plainly indicates" that the author or someone close to him "discovered" this topic (the policy also links to the fact that such discoveries may be made in
216:
This article was created by the original author claiming it is a mixed drink. A web search threw up zero links for the article title as a drink. Post this, I nominated this article under the A11 criteria as the web search results combined with a plain reading of the article indicated to me that the
232:
I have read A11 deeply and have not found the mention of explicit evidence requirement of the author making up the topic. Perhaps the words "plainly indicates" in the A11 policy alludes to the same (I am not sure). Nevertheless, while I notified the administrator that his move went against
185:
282:
with a little curry powder, but not a sufficiently notable variant to be worth a merge (nearest I could find getting secondary source coverage was a "Bloody
Maharani" with curry powder, and gin instead of vodka).
355:
for the patient clarification. (As I mentioned on your talk page, it's been a learning experience for me to understand the nuances involved in A11 and in the related Prod tag. This will assist me in the future.)
316:, and does not credibly indicate why its subject is important or significant" (my emphasis). There is no such indication in this article, so A11 does not apply and was correctly declined. Just being something
265:"CSD A11 is for topics that were or may have been actually created and are real, but have no notice or significance except among a small group of people, e.g. a newly invented drinking game..."
218:
376:
179:
138:
111:
106:
145:
115:
420:
98:
331:). Replacing a PROD by a speedy is evidently not an objection to deletion, so if the speedy is then declined it is allowable to replace the PROD.
237:
policy (that a removed Prod may not be placed back), I am moving ahead and nominating this article for deletion through this discussion.
200:
229:
again reverted me and replaced the removed Prod back on the article mentioning that A11 requires evidence that the author made it up.
167:
17:
416:
161:
510:
489:
472:
439:
424:
392:
365:
344:
292:
246:
80:
529:
40:
157:
102:
412:
207:
312:, which are "This applies to any article that plainly indicates that the subject was invented/coined/discovered
436:
361:
242:
94:
86:
279:
459:), but "Ouch my toes are burning" does not seem to be notable, as for that I only found Knowledge (XXG).
525:
505:.The misspelled title makes me wonder of the article creator might have had one too many of the drinks.
36:
485:
173:
452:
501:. I also could find no references at all. Nothing more than a drink recipe, the article reads like
433:
357:
238:
193:
74:
481:
403:. This article has no place in Knowledge (XXG), per, along with the policies mentioned by JohnCD,
328:
288:
466:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
524:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
234:
53:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
340:
502:
404:
317:
309:
57:
66:
408:
448:
385:
498:
284:
222:
506:
463:
132:
432:. No sources are provided, and I would be surprised if any sources even exist. --
456:
352:
336:
226:
451:(as well as several other mentions of Bloody Mary with curry powder, such as
380:
518:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
325:
excludes removals that are clearly not an objection to deletion
308:
The policy for A11 deletions is defined by the actual words of
447:-- I dug around on Google for sources, and I did find the
314:
by the article's creator or someone they know personally
128:
124:
120:
192:
377:
list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions
206:
300:as not notable - no sources supplied, none found.
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
532:). No further edits should be made to this page.
278:as unsourced. Reading it again it seems to be a
8:
375:Note: This debate has been included in the
374:
305:Comment on the procedures involved here:
221:). The CSD was removed and a Prod put by
256:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
323:The rule against replacing a PROD "
24:
56:unanimous deletion, and ALSO per
480:No evidence this even exists...
1:
411:, and general common sense.
549:
511:20:41, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
490:07:37, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
81:14:23, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
473:22:47, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
440:04:32, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
425:01:20, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
393:14:00, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
366:04:00, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
345:12:06, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
320:is not enough for speedy.
293:09:58, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
247:05:11, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
95:Ouch my toes are burining
87:Ouch my toes are burining
521:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
413:Colonel Wilhelm Klink
503:something made up
395:
389:
540:
523:
471:
462:
390:
387:
383:
267:
261:
211:
210:
196:
148:
136:
118:
79:
77:
71:
70:
34:
548:
547:
543:
542:
541:
539:
538:
537:
536:
530:deletion review
519:
469:
460:
449:Bloody Maharani
386:
381:
318:made up one day
272:
271:
270:
263:As per policy:
262:
258:
153:
144:
109:
93:
90:
75:
68:
67:
64:
61:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
546:
544:
535:
534:
514:
513:
492:
475:
442:
434:Metropolitan90
427:
397:
396:
372:
371:
370:
369:
368:
358:Xender Lourdes
334:
333:
332:
321:
302:
301:
295:
269:
268:
255:
254:
250:
239:Xender Lourdes
214:
213:
150:
89:
84:
62:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
545:
533:
531:
527:
522:
516:
515:
512:
508:
504:
500:
496:
493:
491:
487:
483:
479:
476:
474:
468:
465:
458:
454:
450:
446:
443:
441:
438:
435:
431:
428:
426:
422:
418:
414:
410:
406:
402:
399:
398:
394:
391:
384:
378:
373:
367:
363:
359:
354:
350:
349:
348:
347:
346:
342:
338:
335:
330:
326:
322:
319:
315:
311:
307:
306:
304:
303:
299:
296:
294:
290:
286:
281:
277:
274:
273:
266:
260:
257:
253:
249:
248:
244:
240:
236:
230:
228:
224:
220:
209:
205:
202:
199:
195:
191:
187:
184:
181:
178:
175:
172:
169:
166:
163:
159:
156:
155:Find sources:
151:
147:
143:
140:
134:
130:
126:
122:
117:
113:
108:
104:
100:
96:
92:
91:
88:
85:
83:
82:
78:
72:
59:
55:
51:
50:speedy delete
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
520:
517:
494:
477:
444:
429:
400:
324:
313:
297:
275:
264:
259:
251:
233:established
231:
215:
203:
197:
189:
182:
176:
170:
164:
154:
141:
49:
47:
31:
28:
280:Bloody Mary
180:free images
499:notability
417:Complaints
310:WP:CSD#A11
252:References
69:Salvidrim!
526:talk page
329:WP:DEPROD
58:WP:CSD#G3
37:talk page
528:or in a
421:Mistakes
285:McGeddon
223:McGeddon
139:View log
39:or in a
482:Elaenia
464:ekips39
351:Thanks
327:" (see
186:WP refs
174:scholar
112:protect
107:history
54:WP:SNOW
497:Fails
495:Delete
478:Delete
467:(talk)
445:Delete
437:(talk)
430:Delete
405:WP:GNG
401:Delete
353:JohnCD
337:JohnCD
298:Delete
276:Delete
227:JohnCD
219:"pubs"
158:Google
116:delete
507:Geoff
409:WP:CS
382:/wiae
201:JSTOR
162:books
146:Stats
133:views
125:watch
121:links
16:<
486:talk
457:this
455:and
453:this
388:/tlk
362:talk
341:talk
289:talk
243:talk
235:PROD
194:FENS
168:news
129:logs
103:talk
99:edit
509:|
208:TWL
137:– (
488:)
423:)
407:,
379:.
364:)
343:)
291:)
283:--
245:)
188:)
131:|
127:|
123:|
119:|
114:|
110:|
105:|
101:|
73:·
65:·
60:.
52:.
484:(
470:❀
461:♫
419:|
415:(
360:(
339:(
287:(
241:(
212:)
204:·
198:·
190:·
183:·
177:·
171:·
165:·
160:(
152:(
149:)
142:·
135:)
97:(
76:✉
63:☺
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.