454:
on the basis of the tribute to him in one of the major journals in the field, as cited in the article: when academics die, we are more likely to find material of this sort, which makes it unnecessary for us to evaluate the details of the citation record--because a RS has already done that.
168:
490:
DGG, the tribute is, as far as I can see, not published in any journal but just on the website of a society (unless you are referring to the journalogy link in the article, which does not work for me).
358:
121:
162:
338:
318:
128:
94:
89:
98:
81:
253:
475:
183:
150:
17:
144:
563:
40:
543:
520:
500:
446:
421:
394:
370:
350:
330:
309:
279:
257:
228:
63:
442:
140:
433:. The citation record and the achievements listed in the article are not enough to convince me of a pass of
85:
190:
559:
249:
36:
539:
496:
471:
463:
390:
305:
275:
241:
224:
438:
176:
208:
77:
69:
156:
509:
It's a signed article on the website of a learned society--I consider it a sufficiently RS.
366:
346:
326:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
558:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
405:
245:
535:
492:
467:
386:
301:
293:
271:
220:
434:
417:
212:
200:
58:
534:. Described alliteratively as "the Socrates of British Soil Science" in source cited.
516:
362:
342:
322:
115:
237:
This person is notable enough.the article is also concise and well referenced.
408:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
54:
511:
382:
204:
552:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
359:
list of
Academics and educators-related deletion discussions
270:
The account above appears to have been blocked as a sock.
300:
notability is met, your opinion risks to be ignored. --
111:
107:
103:
175:
415:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
566:). No further edits should be made to this page.
189:
8:
357:Note: This debate has been included in the
339:list of Science-related deletion discussions
337:Note: This debate has been included in the
317:Note: This debate has been included in the
292:Unless you base your !vote on policy (e.g.
356:
336:
319:list of India-related deletion discussions
316:
459:(at NYPL) 20:55, 4 March 2013 (UTC)
7:
24:
203:that have been cited 440 times (
199:Vaidyanathan has 29 articles in
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
447:22:53, 26 February 2013 (UTC)
422:00:15, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
395:01:43, 20 February 2013 (UTC)
371:01:29, 20 February 2013 (UTC)
351:01:29, 20 February 2013 (UTC)
331:01:29, 20 February 2013 (UTC)
310:09:48, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
258:03:56, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
229:13:35, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
583:
385:of 15. On the borderline.
544:22:08, 4 March 2013 (UTC)
521:02:25, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
501:21:10, 4 March 2013 (UTC)
280:22:12, 4 March 2013 (UTC)
64:13:11, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
555:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
207:= 13). Does not meet
78:L. V. Vaidyanathan
70:L. V. Vaidyanathan
48:The result was
480:
466:comment added by
424:
373:
353:
333:
261:
244:comment added by
574:
557:
479:
460:
420:
414:
410:
260:
238:
194:
193:
179:
131:
119:
101:
62:
34:
582:
581:
577:
576:
575:
573:
572:
571:
570:
564:deletion review
553:
461:
416:
403:
296:) and indicate
239:
136:
127:
92:
76:
73:
53:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
580:
578:
569:
568:
548:
547:
528:
527:
526:
525:
524:
523:
504:
503:
482:
481:
449:
439:David Eppstein
427:
426:
425:
412:
411:
400:
399:
398:
381:. GS gives an
375:
374:
354:
334:
314:
313:
312:
286:
285:
284:
283:
263:
262:
201:Web of Science
197:
196:
133:
72:
67:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
579:
567:
565:
561:
556:
550:
549:
545:
541:
537:
533:
530:
529:
522:
518:
514:
513:
508:
507:
506:
505:
502:
498:
494:
489:
486:
485:
484:
483:
477:
473:
469:
465:
458:
453:
450:
448:
444:
440:
436:
432:
429:
428:
423:
419:
413:
409:
407:
402:
401:
396:
392:
388:
384:
380:
377:
376:
372:
368:
364:
360:
355:
352:
348:
344:
340:
335:
332:
328:
324:
320:
315:
311:
307:
303:
299:
295:
291:
288:
287:
281:
277:
273:
269:
268:
267:
266:
265:
264:
259:
255:
251:
247:
243:
236:
233:
232:
231:
230:
226:
222:
218:
214:
210:
206:
202:
192:
188:
185:
182:
178:
174:
170:
167:
164:
161:
158:
155:
152:
149:
146:
142:
139:
138:Find sources:
134:
130:
126:
123:
117:
113:
109:
105:
100:
96:
91:
87:
83:
79:
75:
74:
71:
68:
66:
65:
60:
56:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
554:
551:
531:
510:
487:
462:— Preceding
456:
451:
430:
404:
378:
297:
289:
240:— Preceding
234:
216:
198:
186:
180:
172:
165:
159:
153:
147:
137:
124:
49:
47:
31:
28:
431:Weak delete
246:Davidjohn13
209:WP:ACADEMIC
163:free images
536:Xxanthippe
493:Randykitty
468:DGG (NYPL)
387:Xxanthippe
302:Randykitty
272:Xxanthippe
221:Randykitty
560:talk page
532:Weak keep
418:TBrandley
363:• Gene93k
343:• Gene93k
323:• Gene93k
215:, hence:
59:talk page
37:talk page
562:or in a
476:contribs
464:unsigned
406:Relisted
294:WP:NPROF
254:contribs
242:unsigned
122:View log
39:or in a
488:Comment
435:WP:PROF
383:h-index
379:Comment
290:Comment
213:WP:NBIO
205:h-index
169:WP refs
157:scholar
95:protect
90:history
217:Delete
141:Google
99:delete
517:talk
184:JSTOR
145:books
129:Stats
116:views
108:watch
104:links
16:<
540:talk
497:talk
472:talk
452:Keep
443:talk
391:talk
367:talk
347:talk
327:talk
306:talk
276:talk
250:talk
235:KEEP
225:talk
177:FENS
151:news
112:logs
86:talk
82:edit
55:J04n
50:keep
512:DGG
457:DGG
437:. —
298:how
211:or
191:TWL
120:– (
542:)
519:)
499:)
491:--
478:)
474:•
445:)
393:)
369:)
361:.
349:)
341:.
329:)
321:.
308:)
278:)
256:)
252:•
227:)
219:.
171:)
114:|
110:|
106:|
102:|
97:|
93:|
88:|
84:|
52:.
546:.
538:(
515:(
495:(
470:(
441:(
397:.
389:(
365:(
345:(
325:(
304:(
282:.
274:(
248:(
223:(
195:)
187:·
181:·
173:·
166:·
160:·
154:·
148:·
143:(
135:(
132:)
125:·
118:)
80:(
61:)
57:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.