437:. Not even the basic hyperlink works. The third so-called source is merely a definition of the LOLcat Bible Translation Project, written by some annonymous contributor. The fifth, well, that is also a blog. The sixth again returns nothing after many archival searches. In other words, only about two sources are reliable for this entry. The article should be merged with history of LOLcats, or something.Also, the fact of whether it is written well or not is not under dispute. Effort=/=Fact.--
435:
373:, the guideline for stubs; being a stub is not a reason to delete an article. I also don't know what the nominator means by saying that the "chronicle" link is unaccessible; there's no mention of anything called the Chronicle in this article or its cites. Nor are there any inappropriately duplicated links in the references. --
824:
under a different title; (2) it's available at archive.org as currently shown in the footnote; (3) there is no requirement that sources be available on line, so even if it were not currently available on-line that wouldn't affect its sufficiency as a source for the purposes of showing notability.
341:
Paraphrasing the wikipedia:tutorial, wikipedia policy is to build up stubs- and I see few sources which would allow this to be any more than a stub, and a short one at that- but stubs are not relevant to wikipedia.The links are rotted. For one thing the chronicle link currently on the page is
87:
81:
182:
342:
unaccessbile. If it is to stay, it must be formatted. Other links are duplicates of each other, such as links 1 and 3 on the references list. That makes like 1 reliable source, and might I remind you that that is toppled by
318:, until an explanation for the above and about why the web sources "don't work" is provided which is actually consistent with WP policy. The subject has multiple independant sources, therefore it is notable. -
76:
176:
143:
116:
111:
388:. 1. Yeah, there's a misunderstanding of stubs there; 2. the Internet Archive is your friend; 3. The person you were cautioning about voting twice, MF, only had voted once. -
120:
594:
520:
103:
859:
Well, the archive footnote doesn't work on my most advanced computer browser, with all settings on max. It didn't work two days in a row. If someone could connect this
721:
Maybe he means that this AfD should be speedy closed and another AfD about the article should be opened. I can't understand why. Why not simply comment in this AfD?
872:
854:
834:
811:
790:
761:
737:
712:
688:
671:
643:
609:
584:
534:
507:
486:
462:
446:
423:
399:
380:
355:
334:
304:
283:
262:
59:
221:
criterion. I'm aware that another nomination of this page for deletion exists, but the crap has gotten even worse, since then. Hard to imagine, but true.
455:
Note to closing admin: Malleus's "delete" recommendation as the nominator has already been taken into account and should not be double-counted. --
250:
477:. These are acceptable as sources, so long as the writers are professionals and the blog is subject to the newspaper's full editorial control."--
639:
237:
197:
570:
164:
107:
249:- Even counting the one source that isn't working, there's still two workable reliable sources in the article discussing the subject, plus
547:
217:" is amazingly unsupported. No sources seem to be evident, beyond links which, chiefly, do not work. This should be deleted as per the
17:
158:
214:
99:
65:
573:
154:
563:
369:, and the editorial linked by Umbralcorax above could be added as a source too. I believe the nominator has misunderstood
204:
889:
36:
863:, with the footnote connected to the archived copy of this, so the footnote actually worked, I'd bee much obliged.--
868:
807:
684:
635:
503:
442:
351:
279:
233:
679:- I'm thinking that this AFD should be put through the AFD process once again, for further scrutiny. Thoughts?--
888:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
848:
755:
706:
528:
459:
393:
377:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
170:
627:
432:
225:
218:
431:, I will show the sources, and why 80% of them are inaccurate. The first so-called source is a blog, here
328:
298:
546:. Reliable sources already present in the article; this project also was the subject of coverage by the
864:
803:
680:
631:
499:
438:
347:
275:
258:
229:
470:
343:
860:
821:
844:
830:
751:
702:
580:
524:
482:
456:
389:
374:
190:
555:
746:
Not to assume bad faith, but the only reason I can think of for that would be a dislike of the
786:
667:
605:
320:
290:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
747:
370:
623:
some kind of blog. Suggest more than 2 sources that aren't some kind of blog, wikipedians.
254:
655:
559:
346:? Also, you're not allowed to vote twice, no matter who you are, on a proposed deletion.--
659:
366:
826:
576:
551:
478:
55:
734:
420:
782:
663:
601:
137:
498:: I meant the Los Angeles Times link is inaccessible, not "the Chronicle".--
50:
722:
434:. This is against wikipolicy. The second source is untraceable, see here
408:
253:
from the
Chicago Tribune. More than enough to allow a stub-type article.
88:
Articles for deletion/LOLCat Bible
Translation Project Second Nomination
566:
82:
Articles for deletion/LOLCat Bible
Translation Project (2nd nomination)
778:
882:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
474:
407:, a well written and sourced article about a notable project.
781:. I just cannot see how it is worth an article on its own.
843:
broken. Perhaps your computer can't access archive.org? -
820:
Actually, (1) it's available on the L.A. Times website
133:
129:
125:
658:
that this is notable. As the years go on, "moar" and
274:: Stubs are specifically disallowed by wiki policy. --
189:
77:
203:
473:: "Several newspapers host columns that they call
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
892:). No further edits should be made to this page.
521:accessable right there in the References section
798:- 5the link to the Los Angeles Times article
595:list of Websites-related deletion discussions
8:
654:- this is really the third nomination, and
589:
750:, and hoping for a different result... -
593:: This debate has been included in the
74:
569:conference on internet pop culture at
365:. The article already has legitimate
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
619:: Very few of the cited sources are
548:Australian Broadcasting Corporation
72:
24:
701:what you mean by that comment? -
215:LOLCat Bible Translation Project
100:LOLCat Bible Translation Project
66:LOLCat Bible Translation Project
469:Regarding "blogs", please see
1:
873:18:17, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
855:01:53, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
835:01:18, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
812:01:06, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
656:we already have had consensus
519:Er...the LA Times article is
60:17:25, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
791:17:59, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
762:20:07, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
738:19:43, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
713:19:07, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
689:17:35, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
672:01:52, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
644:18:47, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
610:18:43, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
585:18:19, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
565:, and discussed at the 2008
535:18:08, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
508:17:01, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
487:18:19, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
463:08:28, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
447:14:10, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
424:07:20, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
400:06:45, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
381:04:55, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
356:03:58, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
335:03:48, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
305:03:38, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
284:03:24, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
263:02:45, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
909:
662:attest to its notability.
219:Knowledge (XXG):Notability
885:Please do not modify it.
344:Knowledge (XXG):ONEEVENT
32:Please do not modify it.
71:AfDs for this article:
839:As noted above, it's
371:Knowledge (XXG):Stub
288:By which policy? -
699:no idea whatsoever
44:The result was
647:
630:comment added by
612:
598:
242:
228:comment added by
900:
887:
865:Malleus Felonius
851:
804:Malleus Felonius
758:
731:
728:
725:
709:
681:Malleus Felonius
646:
632:Malleus Felonius
624:
599:
531:
500:Malleus Felonius
439:Malleus Felonius
417:
414:
411:
396:
348:Malleus Felonius
333:
331:
326:
323:
303:
301:
296:
293:
276:Malleus Felonius
241:
230:Malleus Felonius
222:
208:
207:
193:
141:
123:
34:
908:
907:
903:
902:
901:
899:
898:
897:
896:
890:deletion review
883:
853:
849:
760:
756:
729:
726:
723:
711:
707:
625:
560:Popular Science
533:
529:
415:
412:
409:
398:
394:
329:
324:
321:
319:
299:
294:
291:
289:
223:
150:
114:
98:
95:
93:
90:
69:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
906:
904:
895:
894:
879:
878:
877:
876:
875:
847:
845:The Bushranger
837:
815:
814:
793:
771:
770:
769:
768:
767:
766:
765:
764:
754:
752:The Bushranger
741:
740:
716:
715:
705:
703:The Bushranger
692:
691:
674:
660:better sources
614:
613:
587:
552:Radio National
540:
539:
538:
537:
527:
525:The Bushranger
511:
510:
492:
491:
490:
489:
466:
465:
457:Metropolitan90
450:
449:
426:
402:
392:
390:The Bushranger
383:
375:Metropolitan90
359:
358:
338:
337:
312:
311:
310:
309:
308:
307:
266:
265:
251:this editorial
211:
210:
147:
94:
92:
91:
86:
84:
79:
73:
70:
68:
63:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
905:
893:
891:
886:
880:
874:
870:
866:
862:
858:
857:
856:
852:
850:One ping only
846:
842:
838:
836:
832:
828:
823:
819:
818:
817:
816:
813:
809:
805:
801:
797:
794:
792:
788:
784:
780:
776:
773:
772:
763:
759:
757:One ping only
753:
749:
745:
744:
743:
742:
739:
736:
732:
720:
719:
718:
717:
714:
710:
708:One ping only
704:
700:
696:
695:
694:
693:
690:
686:
682:
678:
675:
673:
669:
665:
661:
657:
653:
650:
649:
648:
645:
641:
637:
633:
629:
622:
618:
611:
607:
603:
596:
592:
588:
586:
582:
578:
574:
572:
568:
564:
562:
561:
556:
553:
549:
545:
542:
541:
536:
532:
530:One ping only
526:
522:
518:
515:
514:
513:
512:
509:
505:
501:
497:
494:
493:
488:
484:
480:
476:
472:
468:
467:
464:
461:
458:
454:
453:
452:
451:
448:
444:
440:
436:
433:
430:
427:
425:
422:
418:
406:
403:
401:
397:
395:One ping only
391:
387:
384:
382:
379:
376:
372:
368:
364:
361:
360:
357:
353:
349:
345:
340:
339:
336:
332:
327:
317:
314:
313:
306:
302:
297:
287:
286:
285:
281:
277:
273:
270:
269:
268:
267:
264:
260:
256:
252:
248:
245:
244:
243:
239:
235:
231:
227:
220:
216:
206:
202:
199:
196:
192:
188:
184:
181:
178:
175:
172:
169:
166:
163:
160:
156:
153:
152:Find sources:
148:
145:
139:
135:
131:
127:
122:
118:
113:
109:
105:
101:
97:
96:
89:
85:
83:
80:
78:
75:
67:
64:
62:
61:
57:
53:
52:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
884:
881:
840:
799:
795:
774:
698:
697:Er...I have
676:
651:
626:— Preceding
620:
616:
615:
590:
558:
543:
516:
495:
428:
404:
385:
362:
315:
271:
246:
224:— Preceding
212:
200:
194:
186:
179:
173:
167:
161:
151:
49:
45:
43:
31:
28:
471:WP:NEWSBLOG
255:Umbralcorax
177:free images
827:Arxiloxos
802:broken.--
602:• Gene93k
577:Arxiloxos
479:Arxiloxos
640:contribs
628:unsigned
554:network
517:Comment:
238:contribs
226:unsigned
144:View log
796:Comment
783:Esoglou
748:WP:SNOW
677:Comment
664:Bearian
617:Comment
567:ROFLCon
496:Comment
367:sources
272:Comment
183:WP refs
171:scholar
117:protect
112:history
779:Lolcat
460:(talk)
429:Delete
378:(talk)
155:Google
121:delete
777:with
775:Merge
575:. --
475:blogs
213:The "
198:JSTOR
159:books
138:views
130:watch
126:links
48:. --
16:<
869:talk
861:here
831:talk
822:here
808:talk
787:talk
735:Talk
685:talk
668:talk
652:Keep
636:talk
621:not
606:talk
591:Note
581:talk
557:and
544:Keep
523:. -
504:talk
483:talk
443:talk
421:Talk
405:Keep
386:Keep
363:Keep
352:talk
330:shoe
325:lake
322:file
316:Keep
300:shoe
295:lake
292:file
280:talk
259:talk
247:Keep
234:talk
191:FENS
165:news
134:logs
108:talk
104:edit
56:talk
51:Cirt
46:keep
841:not
571:MIT
550:'s
205:TWL
142:– (
871:)
833:)
825:--
810:)
800:is
789:)
733:|
687:)
670:)
642:)
638:•
608:)
597:.
583:)
506:)
485:)
445:)
419:|
354:)
282:)
261:)
240:)
236:•
185:)
136:|
132:|
128:|
124:|
119:|
115:|
110:|
106:|
58:)
867:(
829:(
806:(
785:(
730:P
727:I
724:J
683:(
666:(
634:(
604:(
600:—
579:(
502:(
481:(
441:(
416:P
413:I
410:J
350:(
278:(
257:(
232:(
209:)
201:·
195:·
187:·
180:·
174:·
168:·
162:·
157:(
149:(
146:)
140:)
102:(
54:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.