281:. One test I apply when I think about how to vote, is it likely that a reader, not knowing what the term means, might seek information. I think it passes. Really, though, I think we would do better to have a single list of internet slang, and redirects from the individual terms, since how much really can you say about LOL? Also, that way, an information-seeking reader would be quickly informed about related terms which might puzzle her.--
167:
lack citations, although it could use more of them. And since "LOL" is maybe the most common piece of
Internet slang, it's probably best to keep it. Otherwise we might end up deleting all articles on Internet slang, which would be too bad. (I'm all for getting rid of the slang itself, by the way
48:
Idon'tlikeit is not a reason for deletion, consensus has quickly formed, and during the nomination Uncle G has done an outstanding job of expanding and referencing the article.
115:
88:
83:
92:
75:
17:
374:
409:
397:
385:
365:
349:
329:
317:
301:
285:
273:
261:
229:
212:
188:
172:
152:
139:
126:
57:
424:
79:
36:
423:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
382:
53:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
325:, one of the very notable internet slang term ever used. Its used almost everywhere, this nomination is uh...
406:
341:
358:
310:
326:
251:
149:
123:
71:
63:
373:
Although it DOES annoy me when my friends use this term, it's still notable as many people use it.--
379:
238:
224:
49:
314:
256:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
246:
221:
294:
209:
394:
282:
270:
185:
168:(btw?), but since it exists it is, unfortunately, notable in my opinion (IMO?). --
109:
338:
169:
136:
362:
197:
148:
Secondly, who cares about how many different ways you can type "LOL"?
237:
per nominator out-arguing themselves in the nomination reason. --
417:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
220:. One of the most common slang terms ever on the internet.
105:
101:
97:
309:- First of all, the article has citations. Secondly,
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
427:). No further edits should be made to this page.
135:According to nominator subject is notable. --
8:
313:isn't a very good argument for deletion. --
145:First of all, the article lacks citations.
357:, as the nomination seems to run afoul of
122:page, although notable, is not necessary
7:
24:
184:. Reason for deletion is...? ---
196:, notable Internet slang term.
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
337:lol at this nomination, meets
1:
410:16:05, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
398:16:03, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
386:15:08, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
366:14:58, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
350:14:23, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
330:13:33, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
318:12:29, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
302:12:26, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
295:
286:12:25, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
274:12:19, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
262:08:51, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
230:08:38, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
213:06:59, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
189:06:47, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
173:06:08, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
153:06:03, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
140:05:57, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
127:05:50, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
58:17:50, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
444:
393:, LMAO @ nominator, ROFL.
420:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
72:LOL (Internet slang)
64:LOL (Internet slang)
407:Yeanold Viskersenn
293:: It's notable.--
259:
227:
163:the article does
56:
435:
422:
377:
347:
344:
299:
255:
244:
225:
206:
203:
200:
113:
95:
52:
34:
443:
442:
438:
437:
436:
434:
433:
432:
431:
425:deletion review
418:
375:
359:I don't like it
345:
342:
311:I don't like it
269:per above. ---
254:
239:
204:
201:
198:
86:
70:
67:
44:The result was
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
441:
439:
430:
429:
413:
412:
400:
388:
368:
352:
332:
320:
304:
288:
276:
264:
250:
232:
215:
191:
178:
177:
176:
175:
143:
142:
120:
119:
66:
61:
50:CanadianCaesar
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
440:
428:
426:
421:
415:
414:
411:
408:
405:, obviously.
404:
401:
399:
396:
392:
389:
387:
384:
381:
378:
372:
369:
367:
364:
360:
356:
353:
351:
348:
346:Postlethwaite
340:
336:
333:
331:
328:
324:
321:
319:
316:
312:
308:
305:
303:
300:
298:
292:
289:
287:
284:
280:
277:
275:
272:
268:
265:
263:
258:
253:
248:
245:
243:
236:
233:
231:
228:
223:
219:
216:
214:
211:
207:
195:
192:
190:
187:
183:
180:
179:
174:
171:
166:
162:
159:
158:
157:
156:
155:
154:
151:
146:
141:
138:
134:
131:
130:
129:
128:
125:
117:
111:
107:
103:
99:
94:
90:
85:
81:
77:
73:
69:
68:
65:
62:
60:
59:
55:
54:Et tu, Brute?
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
419:
416:
402:
390:
370:
354:
334:
322:
306:
297:♪♫ ĽąĦĩŘǔ ♫♪
296:
290:
278:
266:
241:
234:
217:
193:
181:
164:
160:
147:
144:
133:SPEEDY KEEP.
132:
121:
45:
43:
31:
28:
403:Speedy Keep
391:Speedy Keep
371:Speedy Keep
355:Speedy Keep
327:Terence Ong
307:Speedy Keep
235:Speedy Keep
182:Speedy keep
46:speedy keep
247:yukichigai
150:Carson6254
124:Carson6254
222:Sjakkalle
271:Tito Pao
226:(Check!)
116:View log
395:Tarinth
383:Collins
283:Wehwalt
186:RockMFR
161:comment
89:protect
84:history
315:Onorem
252:ramble
170:N Shar
137:N Shar
93:delete
380:kully
257:argue
110:views
102:watch
98:links
16:<
363:Tarc
343:Ryan
339:WP:V
335:Keep
323:Keep
291:Keep
279:Keep
267:Keep
218:Keep
210:Talk
194:Keep
106:logs
80:talk
76:edit
165:not
114:- (
361:.
260:)
208:|
108:|
104:|
100:|
96:|
91:|
87:|
82:|
78:|
376:S
249:(
242:|
240:Y
205:P
202:I
199:J
118:)
112:)
74:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.