123:
says it all: "There are 169 total pages in the database. This includes "talk" pages, pages about The LA Wiki, minimal "stub" pages, redirects, and others that probably don't qualify as content pages. Excluding those, there are 6 pages that are probably legitimate content pages." If that's "one of the 27 largest City Wikis in the world" (as the author claims on the talk page), I shudder to think what the others look like.
122:
Tried CSD, was declined, but I think the decline was in error. This meets A7, as the article makes no effort to assert notability. It's likely because there isn't any. I ran several Google searches trying to find anything about it and came up with zilch. I think this paragraph from the site itself
383:- page was created by user with COI, and does not cite neutral sources for assertions of notability. Basically, this deletion is the assertion of a double standard. However, since logic does not trump ignorant voting, it will likely be deleted.
336:- if it went from 13 articles to the current 169 in one year, it will have had a 1200% annual growth rate, which might well be the fastest-growing city wiki in the U.S., or even the world. That does not necessarily mean it's notable.
259:
I am not advocating a lawsuit against the owner of LA Wiki, but certainly it should be made known to the relevant parties that most of LA Wiki's substantive content (three of the five articles) violates GFDL.
202:. The LA Wiki is not ready to promote itself anywhere given its extreme lack of content. Furthermore, someone knowledgeable about GFDL should bring to the attention of the powers that be at Knowledge that
281:...LA Wiki is the fastest-growing city wiki in the United States...also runs on the MediaWiki framework, one of the first City Wiki's to employ the scaleable technology behind Knowledge
328:
115:
283:) but lacks any secondary sources to confirm this. The first point, if well sourced, would establish notability in my mind, but now it's just an empty promise. Level it!
435:- these articles were kept b/c they make assertions of notability that reference themselves. Comparison is to reasons for keeping them, not that they exist. All
319:
483:
assert a claim to notability so it is safe from speedy deletion. However, if the article claims that the web content is notable but the claim cannot be
472:
of notability. If an article about web content does not even assert a claim to notability, the article can be speedily deleted under
454:
399:
310:
251:
232:
licensing - I think the content is safe. By the time of any sort of suit, the article will likely already fall into the domain of
492:
17:
414:; other articles are completely irrelevant to the deletion of this one. Feel free to nominate those articles for deletion.
444:
301:
88:
83:
92:
523:
36:
182:. No evidence that there has been non-trivial coverage of subject by reliable, third-party published sources. —
522:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
499:
362:
264:
214:
75:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
207:
458:
395:
247:
391:
375:- COI or no, substantiated or no, I find it hard to justify the inclusion of articles about any other
243:
450:
387:
239:
184:
496:
359:
261:
211:
502:
462:
423:
365:
347:
292:
267:
217:
190:
170:
152:
132:
79:
57:
343:
148:
128:
143:. The article lists the owner of LA Wiki as "Andrew Tutt", the same as the author's username.
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
477:
71:
63:
166:
53:
358:
Its mainspace consists of those, two redirects, its Main Page, and an empty portal. --
473:
439:
has to do is assert notability for itself and it will survive this process Re: other
432:
419:
411:
339:
288:
199:
179:
144:
140:
124:
488:
109:
484:
162:
440:
380:
376:
225:
49:
415:
284:
233:
356:
203:
139:: I missed this when I posted it, but it also appears the author has a
355:
If only ... the LA Wiki actually has only five content pages now.
279:- as current version, it makes several assertions of notability (
516:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
229:
436:
491:, the article may be deleted pursuant to a discussion at
105:
101:
97:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
468:Actually, the criteria require more than just an
526:). No further edits should be made to this page.
495:, which is what we are doing now for LA Wiki. --
8:
379:that meet the criteria outlined above. Take
210:without proper attribution under GFDL. --
443:which do just that. (See paragraph 1 of
206:was apparently copied from Knowledge's
7:
24:
204:LA Wiki's article on Los Angeles
493:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
161:per nom. It's just an advert.
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
178:as insufficiently notable per
1:
58:15:04, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
503:03:25, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
474:criteria for speedy deletion
463:18:37, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
424:11:04, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
366:03:25, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
348:01:48, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
329:20:14, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
293:15:20, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
268:14:36, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
218:15:12, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
191:14:54, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
171:14:30, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
153:14:11, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
133:14:08, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
543:
519:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
208:Los Angeles, California
445:WP:Other Stuff Exists
300:as above and nom. -
141:conflict of interest
228:has never enforced
465:
453:comment added by
404:
390:comment added by
256:
242:comment added by
534:
521:
489:reliable sources
476:, criterion A7.
448:
403:
384:
346:
324:
315:
306:
255:
236:
189:
113:
95:
34:
542:
541:
537:
536:
535:
533:
532:
531:
530:
524:deletion review
517:
385:
337:
322:
313:
304:
237:
183:
86:
70:
67:
44:The result was
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
540:
538:
529:
528:
512:
511:
510:
509:
508:
507:
506:
505:
497:Metropolitan90
431:- This is not
370:
369:
368:
360:Metropolitan90
331:
295:
274:
273:
272:
271:
270:
262:Metropolitan90
212:Metropolitan90
193:
173:
135:
120:
119:
66:
61:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
539:
527:
525:
520:
514:
513:
504:
501:
498:
494:
490:
486:
482:
479:
475:
471:
467:
466:
464:
460:
456:
452:
446:
442:
438:
434:
430:
427:
426:
425:
421:
417:
413:
409:
406:
405:
401:
397:
393:
389:
382:
378:
374:
371:
367:
364:
361:
357:
354:
351:
350:
349:
345:
342:
341:
335:
332:
330:
327:
326:
325:
318:
317:
316:
309:
308:
307:
299:
296:
294:
290:
286:
282:
278:
275:
269:
266:
263:
258:
257:
253:
249:
245:
241:
235:
231:
227:
224:
221:
220:
219:
216:
213:
209:
205:
201:
197:
194:
192:
188:
187:
181:
177:
174:
172:
168:
164:
160:
157:
156:
155:
154:
150:
146:
142:
138:
134:
130:
126:
117:
111:
107:
103:
99:
94:
90:
85:
81:
77:
73:
69:
68:
65:
62:
60:
59:
55:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
518:
515:
480:
469:
428:
407:
386:— Preceding
372:
352:
338:
333:
321:
320:
312:
311:
303:
302:
297:
280:
276:
238:— Preceding
222:
198:per nom and
195:
185:
175:
158:
136:
121:
45:
43:
31:
28:
455:152.3.78.87
449:—Preceding
392:152.3.78.87
244:152.3.78.87
441:city wikis
186:Satori Son
470:assertion
381:DavisWiki
377:city wiki
226:Knowledge
487:through
485:verified
451:unsigned
400:contribs
388:unsigned
353:Comment.
340:Argyriou
314:Favorite
252:contribs
240:unsigned
234:fair use
145:Gromlakh
125:Gromlakh
116:View log
478:LA Wiki
437:LA Wiki
429:Comment
408:Comment
334:comment
223:Comment
89:protect
84:history
72:LA Wiki
64:LA Wiki
500:(talk)
433:WP:WAX
412:WP:WAX
363:(talk)
344:(talk)
323:Cookie
305:Milk's
298:Delete
277:Delete
265:(talk)
215:(talk)
200:WP:WEB
196:Delete
180:WP:WEB
176:Delete
163:Srpnor
159:Delete
137:UPDATE
93:delete
46:Delete
110:views
102:watch
98:links
16:<
481:does
459:talk
420:talk
396:talk
373:Keep
289:talk
248:talk
230:GFDL
167:talk
149:talk
129:talk
106:logs
80:talk
76:edit
54:talk
50:Fram
447:)
416:WLU
285:WLU
114:– (
461:)
422:)
410:-
402:)
398:•
291:)
260:--
254:)
250:•
169:)
151:)
131:)
108:|
104:|
100:|
96:|
91:|
87:|
82:|
78:|
56:)
48:.
457:(
418:(
394:(
287:(
246:(
165:(
147:(
127:(
118:)
112:)
74:(
52:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.