173:
which endorsed the closure. Contrary to the nominator's claim, the deletion review discussion was well attended. I see no new evidence in this nomination that would substantially change the prior decisions. (That said, it would be nice if more people joined the merger-proposal discussion on the
48:. Considering the few contributions of the nominator, suggests questionable policy knowledge and also maybe AGF nomination, but that does not lessen the fact the the article is well within guidelines, i.e it being
90:
144:
170:
85:
57:
169:. This renomination is premature. The last AFD was only a few weeks ago (and ended in a conditional "keep"). The decision was reviewed in a
17:
117:
112:
205:
183:
160:
69:
121:
104:
66:
222:
36:
221:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
151:
article restored after DRV attended by none. The concerns raised in the original AfD have not been addressed.
193:
156:
61:
201:
179:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
49:
108:
53:
152:
197:
175:
138:
100:
75:
215:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
134:
130:
126:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
91:Articles for deletion/LED circuit (2nd nomination)
225:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
83:
56:; consensus also being apparent at the
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
82:
24:
86:Articles for deletion/LED circuit
1:
206:13:54, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
184:13:38, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
161:04:25, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
70:15:47, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
60:. (Non-administrator close)
242:
171:Deletion Review discussion
218:Please do not modify it.
192:This AfD nomination was
32:Please do not modify it.
174:article's Talk page.)
81:AfDs for this article:
167:Close this nomination
196:. It is listed now.
182:
233:
220:
178:
142:
124:
64:
54:reliable sources
34:
241:
240:
236:
235:
234:
232:
231:
230:
229:
223:deletion review
216:
115:
99:
96:
79:
62:
44:The result was
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
239:
237:
228:
227:
211:
210:
209:
208:
187:
186:
149:
148:
95:
94:
93:
88:
80:
78:
73:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
238:
226:
224:
219:
213:
212:
207:
203:
199:
195:
191:
190:
189:
188:
185:
181:
177:
172:
168:
165:
164:
163:
162:
158:
154:
146:
140:
136:
132:
128:
123:
119:
114:
110:
106:
102:
98:
97:
92:
89:
87:
84:
77:
74:
72:
71:
68:
65:
59:
55:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
217:
214:
166:
150:
45:
43:
31:
28:
101:LED_circuit
76:LED_circuit
194:incomplete
153:A blitter
145:View log
58:last AFD
198:DumbBOT
176:Rossami
118:protect
113:history
50:covered
180:(talk)
122:delete
139:views
131:watch
127:links
16:<
202:talk
157:talk
135:logs
109:talk
105:edit
46:keep
143:– (
52:by
204:)
159:)
137:|
133:|
129:|
125:|
120:|
116:|
111:|
107:|
63:Rt
200:(
155:(
147:)
141:)
103:(
67:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.