Knowledge (XXG)

:Articles for deletion/LUST - Knowledge (XXG)

Source 📝

182:#1) SIGN YOUR COMMENTS by adding 4 tildes (~~~~)to the end. #2) The existance of another deletable article is NOT a defense of this article. If YOU think another article should be deleted then YOU nominate it. This discussion is about the merits (or lack therof) of THIS article. Familiarize yourself with the Knowledge (XXG) policies and guidelines relevent to this discussion, especially 209:
I don't think any of them should be deleted, i'm using them as Precedents particularly to show that if this was page about an american tv station it would not have been nominated for deletion. I apologise for any mistakes i've made in the formatting of this defence, and thank you for the links as it
229:
you cite specifcally says that: "Lower power radio stations limited to a small neighborhood, such as Part 15 operations in the United States or stations with a VF# callsign in Canada, are not inherently notable". Many student-radio stations are very low power, and only broadcast "on campus". (for
168:
I disagree i think its important to have these articles, as many people use wikipedia as there first reference. isn't the point of wikipedia to try collect everything anyone could ever want to know for everyone to access? or is it only for Americans, as i find many american articles unnotable like
119:
The existance of other deletable articles has no bearing on the notability of this article. There are many deletable articles on Knowledge (XXG). If you think they should be deleted, then nominate them. However, it is no defense for this one. Make a defense on the merits of THIS article.
214:
Student TV and Radio, is based on original content, broadcasts it and has to be licensed to do so. on these grounds LUST and all student TV in the UK fulfills the criteria for notability. unless of course all articles are equal but American one are more equal than others. (Capt Jack Doicy)
134:- If every school has a page for every tv or radio station that they had that would be alot of articles that only people at the school would read. That information is probably available on the school website. Perhaps part of this article could be merged into an article on the school. 197:. If you think an article is worthy, mount a defense with EVIDENCE as set out by these guidelines. If you can't provide the evidence, you won't sway the consensus to your favor, and more importantly, you won't sway the closing admin to your favor. -- 242:. The distinction here seems to me to be the broadcast power and area of the station, not association with a university. I am not familiar enough with this station to make any definative statements. Can anyone confirm one way of the other: 246:
I would be willing to change my vote to keep if we can get definitive confirmation of the broadcast range of the station in question. A link to an external site that proves that this station can be seen off campus would be VERY helpful.
244:
Can this TV station be seen throughout the entire metro area, or is this simply run on say, the dormitory cable system and cannot be seen off campus. That would make a huge difference.
210:
lead me to this, "Licensed radio and TV stations are notable if they broadcast over the air and originate at least a portion of their programming schedule in their own studios."
89: 17: 293: 36: 292:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
269: 147: 231: 77: 234:.) Others have powerful enough broadcast range to be heard over an entire metro area.(for example 266: 262: 98: 272: 251: 201: 162: 138: 124: 114: 111: 68: 65: 52: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
226: 211: 92: 239: 170: 194: 191: 187: 135: 183: 248: 198: 159: 121: 101: 278: 80: 49: 95: 83: 169:
the fact it seems every secondary school in american has an article (
86: 74: 225:
Excellent! That is a well found defense. Just one question, the
286:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
235: 104: 58: 265:. "Precedents" are never a good argument on Knowledge (XXG). 73:
why has LUST been classed as non-notable but none of these
171:
http://en.wikipedia.org/Category:High_schools_in_Colorado
263:
Please do not disrupt Knowledge (XXG) to make a point
39:). No further edits should be made to this page. 296:). No further edits should be made to this page. 173:) how are these more notable? (Capt Jack Doicy) 8: 261:as non-notable student society. Jack Doicy, 64:non-notable student-run television station. 90:Glasgow University Student Television 18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion 7: 110:Because I haven't got to them yet. 24: 158:to parent university article. -- 1: 273:16:23, 2 November 2006 (UTC) 252:01:11, 30 October 2006 (UTC) 202:05:19, 28 October 2006 (UTC) 163:06:46, 27 October 2006 (UTC) 139:18:43, 26 October 2006 (UTC) 125:06:46, 27 October 2006 (UTC) 115:18:10, 26 October 2006 (UTC) 69:17:39, 26 October 2006 (UTC) 53:18:39, 6 November 2006 (UTC) 313: 146:trim down and add to the 289:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 148:University of Leicester 232:University of Delaware 230:example, WVUD at the 78:Bloomsbury Television 227:particular precedent 279:The Capone of Lesta 155:Merge and redirect 277:This should stay 304: 291: 34: 312: 311: 307: 306: 305: 303: 302: 301: 300: 294:deletion review 287: 240:Emerson College 221:Change vote to 62: 44:The result was 37:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 310: 308: 299: 298: 282: 281: 275: 256: 255: 254: 207: 206: 205: 204: 166: 165: 151: 141: 128: 127: 117: 61: 56: 42: 41: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 309: 297: 295: 290: 284: 283: 280: 276: 274: 271: 268: 267:Robin Johnson 264: 260: 257: 253: 250: 245: 241: 237: 233: 228: 224: 220: 219: 218: 217: 216: 213: 203: 200: 196: 193: 189: 185: 181: 178: 177: 176: 175: 174: 172: 164: 161: 157: 156: 152: 149: 145: 142: 140: 137: 136:Chris Kreider 133: 130: 129: 126: 123: 118: 116: 113: 109: 108: 107: 106: 103: 102:Winstanley TV 100: 97: 94: 91: 88: 85: 82: 79: 76: 71: 70: 67: 60: 57: 55: 54: 51: 47: 40: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 288: 285: 258: 243: 222: 208: 179: 167: 154: 153: 143: 131: 112:Tom Harrison 72: 66:Tom Harrison 63: 45: 43: 31: 28: 99:Warwick TV 81:CTV (Bath) 249:Jayron32 199:Jayron32 160:Jayron32 150:article. 122:Jayron32 96:Stoic tv 84:Demon TV 223:Neutral 212:WP:AFDP 270:(talk) 259:Delete 132:Delete 87:GlamTV 46:delete 195:WP:RS 192:WP:OR 188:WP:NN 180:reply 144:Merge 93:LSUTV 75:NaSTA 16:< 236:WERS 184:WP:V 105:YSTV 59:LUST 50:Ezeu 48:. -- 238:at 247:-- 190:, 186:, 120:--

Index

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
deletion review
Ezeu
18:39, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
LUST
Tom Harrison
17:39, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
NaSTA
Bloomsbury Television
CTV (Bath)
Demon TV
GlamTV
Glasgow University Student Television
LSUTV
Stoic tv
Warwick TV
Winstanley TV
YSTV
Tom Harrison
18:10, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
Jayron32
06:46, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
Chris Kreider
18:43, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
University of Leicester
Jayron32
06:46, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
http://en.wikipedia.org/Category:High_schools_in_Colorado
WP:V
WP:NN

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.