285:
field of study is not looked on here as rigorous, which can be reasonable, or where there is a prejudice against the field or the person, which is not reasonable. His field is theology, generally considered a rigorous academic discipline. . Is there a prejudice against it? In addition to his doctoral thesis, he published 5 books as author, 2 as editor or coeditor. As the field is fairly narrow--Old
Testament interpretation-- and two of the books are in Afrikaans, and 3 of the others published either in Germany or south Africa, there won't be many holdings in WorldCat, which lists almost exclusively US & Canadian libraries ,and only the largest european libraries. For the two by a US publisher, the one he edited has 508 holdings, which is extremely high for theology (
289:). The other has 81, which is also quite respectable for a book published just one year ago in this rather slow-moving subject. One of the European publications has 131, another 102. A check for reviews in this field will take resources I do not have available online. I consider the holdings sufficient to show that he is a specialist in his field according to WP:PROF. Unless we wish to make the value judgement we regard theology as worthless, he's notable.
284:
Full professor at major South
African research university, apparently ranked 3rd best in South Africa by multiple surveys. Generally, tho not a formal guideline, full professors in major research universities are likely to be notable. The only exceptions in the last 5 years have been people whose
163:
329:
309:
116:
157:
349:
123:
89:
84:
93:
17:
178:
76:
145:
419:
40:
139:
135:
415:
400:
361:
341:
321:
300:
272:
240:
203:
58:
36:
185:
171:
396:
357:
337:
317:
199:
80:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
414:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
377:
151:
287:
Historiography and identity (re)formulation in Second Temple historiographical literature
221:
by an IP. The only references are to catalogue entries: still no evidence of notability.
263:
231:
214:
389:
296:
353:
333:
313:
195:
72:
64:
110:
388:
establish the notability of this person, if online sources cannot be found.
254:
222:
54:
373:
291:
194:
Tagged for notability since 2013, I don't believe he meets WP:Academics
408:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
213:: was PRODded in Feb 2013 as "no evidence of notability to meet
376:'s statement, I feel that at the very least this person passes
330:
list of
Academics and educators-related deletion discussions
218:
106:
102:
98:
170:
310:list of South Africa-related deletion discussions
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
422:). No further edits should be made to this page.
184:
8:
350:list of Authors-related deletion discussions
348:Note: This debate has been included in the
328:Note: This debate has been included in the
308:Note: This debate has been included in the
384:to be the way to reference the article to
347:
327:
307:
253:: I'm persuaded by DGG' s argument below.
7:
24:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
401:17:30, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
59:12:09, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
439:
362:15:20, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
342:15:19, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
322:15:19, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
301:14:37, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
273:16:27, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
241:12:23, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
204:08:54, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
219:dePRODded without comment
411:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
380:. Offline sources
48:The result was
364:
344:
324:
430:
413:
394:
270:
261:
238:
229:
189:
188:
174:
126:
114:
96:
34:
438:
437:
433:
432:
431:
429:
428:
427:
426:
420:deletion review
409:
390:
264:
255:
232:
223:
131:
122:
87:
71:
68:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
436:
434:
425:
424:
404:
403:
366:
365:
345:
325:
304:
303:
278:
277:
276:
275:
245:
244:
192:
191:
128:
67:
62:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
435:
423:
421:
417:
412:
406:
405:
402:
398:
395:
393:
387:
383:
379:
375:
371:
368:
367:
363:
359:
355:
351:
346:
343:
339:
335:
331:
326:
323:
319:
315:
311:
306:
305:
302:
298:
294:
293:
288:
283:
280:
279:
274:
271:
269:
268:
262:
260:
259:
252:
249:
248:
247:
246:
243:
242:
239:
237:
236:
230:
228:
227:
220:
216:
212:
208:
207:
206:
205:
201:
197:
187:
183:
180:
177:
173:
169:
165:
162:
159:
156:
153:
150:
147:
144:
141:
137:
134:
133:Find sources:
129:
125:
121:
118:
112:
108:
104:
100:
95:
91:
86:
82:
78:
74:
70:
69:
66:
63:
61:
60:
57:
56:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
410:
407:
391:
385:
381:
369:
290:
286:
281:
266:
265:
257:
256:
250:
234:
233:
225:
224:
210:
209:
193:
181:
175:
167:
160:
154:
148:
142:
132:
119:
73:Louis Jonker
65:Louis Jonker
53:
49:
47:
31:
28:
158:free images
392:ArcAngel
416:talk page
378:WP:AUTHOR
372:Perusing
354:• Gene93k
334:• Gene93k
314:• Gene93k
37:talk page
418:or in a
117:View log
39:or in a
215:WP:PROF
196:Gbawden
164:WP refs
152:scholar
90:protect
85:history
397:(talk)
386:firmly
382:appear
217:" but
211:Delete
136:Google
94:delete
297:talk
179:JSTOR
140:books
124:Stats
111:views
103:watch
99:links
16:<
370:Keep
358:talk
338:talk
318:talk
282:Keep
251:Keep
200:talk
172:FENS
146:news
107:logs
81:talk
77:edit
55:Tone
50:keep
374:DGG
292:DGG
258:Pam
226:Pam
186:TWL
115:– (
399:)
360:)
352:.
340:)
332:.
320:)
312:.
299:)
202:)
166:)
109:|
105:|
101:|
97:|
92:|
88:|
83:|
79:|
52:.
356:(
336:(
316:(
295:(
267:D
235:D
198:(
190:)
182:·
176:·
168:·
161:·
155:·
149:·
143:·
138:(
130:(
127:)
120:·
113:)
75:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.