599:. Is having a song that's played on ESPN/ABC (which are exactly the same in sports really - if you watch abc and there's a game showing you'll see ESPN in the bottom left/right) really enought for notability. I mean can you imagine seeing these guys in something link Britannica (I know we aren't Britannica, but still ... notability)
209:
The article is indeed about the band "LOURDS" fronted by Lourds Lane. More information can and should be added in about the band in its entirety. The band has toured extensively throughout
America, has been the subject of articles in national publications (Billboard, for example) They have received
399:
The article might not yet do the band justice, but the band is indeed noteworthy. The debate should be about the band itself and not about who is editing their page. There is an absoloute need to flesh out the article as soon as possible. None of the detractors have shown any compelling reason to
482:
Notable band. A simple google search found articles in the New York Daily News, Billboard magazine, National TV programs and more. This would hardly justify deletion. As many above have stated, more information is needed about the entire band and not just Miss Lane.
400:
support deletion, while those in support of keeping the entry have provided legitimate reasons for the page remaining. I reiterate that the entry needs to be expanded as soon as possible to feature the entire band and not just the lead singer Lourds Lane.
210:
national airplay on the Fuse cable music network as well as the national series "City Sounds". The band "LOURDS" is also chronicled in the forthcoming documentary entitled "Always". Worthy of an entry, though article needs to be fleshed out a bit.
153:
Article purports to be about the lead singer, yet the main body of the article is about "LOURDES" the band (their caps) The band could just qualify for notability due to their touring multiple states, albeit the source is their website
648:
issues not withstanding, this article must be sourced from information outside of the bands myspace. I would probably change my votes if links were provided to show evidence of reviews in major music magazines, not local newspapers.
229:. I will work with the leader of the band, Lourds Lane, to address the above issues, expand the content about the band, LOURDS, and create a separate page for the musician and lead singer, Lourds Lane.
62:
122:
442:
of another user. I'm not saying that you actually are, but there have been cases of people trying to create a false consensus in a discussion through the use of sock puppets.--
579:, albeit by a hair's breadth, by reviews cited. However, webmaster should refrain from editing, and if no one else starts contributing to it, it should be deleted.
678:, the band seems, as we say, on the cusp of notability, but isn't there yet. There will be no problem creating this article sometime later this year or next when
57:
717:
455:
discuss whether an article should be deleted. Articles listed here are debated for up to five days, after which the deletion process proceeds based on
459:
consensus." (emphasis added). Someone who shows up just to "vote" in an AFD isn't a
Wikipedian and isn't part of the Knowledge (XXG) community. —
321:
zomg the webmaster of their MYSPACE is the article editor. I think such high authority is proof of their notability. (or lack thereof). Fails
54:
It has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent from the musician/ensemble itself and reliable
661:
One release from a small lable does not notability make. If there is independent press coverage, it should be added to the article.--
608:
17:
591:- lack of sources and external links (well, except for links that they own) lead me to believe that this article does not satisfy
729:
192:, and I'm not sure how I feel about defining those as 'nontrivial.' Article should be about the band, not the person, if kept.-
666:
766:
36:
157:
Would suggest an article on the band is appropriate, but one on the lead singer would not yet deserve own article.
95:
90:
99:
429:
We are not here to debate how many contributions I have made, but the band Lourds. Lets stay on topic, shall we.
765:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
190:
82:
592:
547:
493:
484:
186:
650:
605:
560:
287:
197:
614:
430:
410:
401:
309:
580:
725:
238:
230:
211:
687:
451:
Whether or not
Slurponyou is a sockpuppet isn't the point. "Articles for deletion (AfD) is where
370:
86:
751:
744:
733:
706:
699:
690:
679:
670:
653:
637:
616:
596:
583:
576:
567:
538:
525:
518:
507:
487:
470:
446:
433:
424:
404:
389:
375:
366:
353:
341:
329:
313:
301:
292:
272:
252:
233:
214:
201:
177:
144:
130:
64:
49:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
439:
551:
385:
284:
193:
159:
78:
70:
645:
322:
305:
748:
721:
535:
522:
502:
465:
443:
419:
350:
247:
139:
362:
683:
632:
626:
338:
326:
188:
116:
662:
263:
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
185:. The correct name of the band appears to be LOURDS (no e) and I found reviews
534:, not very notable, but the reviews cited above do meet the minimum criteria.--
438:
Yes, but the fact that you have only made one contribution means you may be a
269:
283:
It looks like a notable band and should be kept, even if it is a small band.
703:
497:
460:
414:
242:
134:
155:
48:, the keep arguments do not indicate how this article seems to meet
759:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
227:
129:
Nonnotable band; no indication of meeting the criteria at
52:. It is clear that this article does not meet the primary
112:
108:
104:
268:
Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks,
224:
223:- I am the webmaster of the LOURDS official website
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
361:, sources cited are primary and/or trivial. Fails
241:has contributed only to the article in question. —
624:no evidence of substantive independent coverage.
769:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
496:'s first contribution to Knowledge (XXG). —
413:'s first contribution to Knowledge (XXG). —
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
714:No independant sources. non-notable
24:
337:Appear to be a non-notable band.
517:, borderline, but seems to meet
363:the primary notability guideline
743:. Borderline, but still meets
226:and the LOURDS MySpace website
1:
752:07:51, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
734:00:29, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
707:22:24, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
691:21:15, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
671:20:13, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
654:19:41, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
638:19:23, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
617:17:09, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
584:15:56, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
568:15:47, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
539:14:49, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
526:12:35, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
508:07:24, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
488:12:28, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
471:07:23, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
447:14:49, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
434:12:37, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
425:12:23, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
405:12:20, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
390:09:25, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
376:07:52, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
354:03:23, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
342:02:53, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
330:02:46, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
314:02:34, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
293:01:31, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
273:00:10, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
253:12:23, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
65:12:37, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
234:00:08, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
215:03:52, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
202:19:31, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
178:19:13, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
145:13:09, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
56:criterion for inclusion. —
786:
546:Article definitely fails
457:Knowledge (XXG) community
762:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
682:is indisputably met. --
325:, among other things.
720:comment was added by
702:is still meeting it.
494:User:Exploring Uranus
59:Nearly Headless Nick
698:only just meeting
737:
651:Daniel J. Leivick
636:
374:
275:
151:Keep - but rename
777:
764:
715:
630:
604:
564:
557:
556:
485:Exploring Uranus
373:
349:per nomination.
290:
267:
264:
174:
173:
172:
171:
170:
120:
102:
60:
34:
785:
784:
780:
779:
778:
776:
775:
774:
773:
767:deletion review
760:
716:—The preceding
669:
611:
600:
562:
554:
553:
411:User:Slurponyou
397:ABSOLUTLEY KEEP
288:
262:
168:
166:
164:
162:
160:
93:
77:
74:
58:
44:The result was
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
783:
781:
772:
771:
755:
754:
747:nonetheless.
738:
709:
693:
673:
665:
656:
640:
619:
609:
602:Daniel()Folsom
586:
570:
541:
529:
512:
511:
510:
477:
476:
475:
474:
473:
436:
427:
393:
392:
378:
365:without that,
356:
344:
332:
316:
295:
277:
276:
266:
258:
257:
256:
255:
217:
204:
180:
127:
126:
73:
68:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
782:
770:
768:
763:
757:
756:
753:
750:
746:
742:
739:
735:
731:
727:
723:
719:
713:
710:
708:
705:
701:
697:
694:
692:
689:
685:
681:
677:
674:
672:
668:
664:
660:
657:
655:
652:
647:
644:
641:
639:
634:
629:
628:
623:
620:
618:
615:
612:
606:
603:
598:
594:
593:WP:Notability
590:
587:
585:
582:
578:
574:
571:
569:
566:
565:
559:
558:
549:
548:WP:NOTABILITY
545:
542:
540:
537:
533:
530:
527:
524:
520:
516:
513:
509:
506:
505:
501:
500:
495:
492:The above is
491:
490:
489:
486:
481:
478:
472:
469:
468:
464:
463:
458:
454:
450:
449:
448:
445:
441:
437:
435:
432:
428:
426:
423:
422:
418:
417:
412:
409:The above is
408:
407:
406:
403:
398:
395:
394:
391:
388:
387:
382:
379:
377:
372:
371:Seraphimblade
368:
364:
360:
357:
355:
352:
348:
345:
343:
340:
336:
333:
331:
328:
324:
320:
317:
315:
311:
307:
303:
299:
296:
294:
291:
286:
282:
279:
278:
274:
271:
265:
260:
259:
254:
251:
250:
246:
245:
240:
239:User:Bkoopers
237:
236:
235:
232:
228:
225:
222:
218:
216:
213:
208:
205:
203:
199:
195:
191:
189:
187:
184:
181:
179:
176:
175:
156:
152:
149:
148:
147:
146:
143:
142:
138:
137:
132:
124:
118:
114:
110:
106:
101:
97:
92:
88:
84:
80:
76:
75:
72:
69:
67:
66:
63:
61:
55:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
761:
758:
740:
711:
695:
675:
658:
642:
625:
621:
601:
588:
572:
561:
552:
543:
531:
514:
503:
498:
479:
466:
461:
456:
452:
420:
415:
396:
384:
380:
358:
346:
334:
318:
297:
280:
261:
248:
243:
220:
206:
182:
158:
150:
140:
135:
128:
53:
45:
43:
31:
28:
453:Wikipedians
440:sock puppet
386:Hobbeslover
300:: violates
285:mrholybrain
219:Definitely
207:Strong KEEP
194:FisherQueen
431:Slurponyou
402:Slurponyou
306:Causesobad
749:RFerreira
722:Dysepsion
581:Samael775
573:Weak Keep
536:Aervanath
523:Lankiveil
444:Aervanath
351:Inkpaduta
183:Weak keep
745:WP:MUSIC
730:contribs
718:unsigned
700:WP:music
684:Dhartung
680:WP:MUSIC
597:WP:Music
577:WP:MUSIC
519:WP:MUSIC
383:per nom
367:WP:MUSIC
339:TJ Spyke
327:Nardman1
302:WP:MUSIC
231:Bkoopers
131:WP:MUSIC
123:View log
50:WP:MUSIC
369:or no.
289:'s talk
96:protect
91:history
712:Delete
676:Delete
663:danntm
659:Delete
643:Delete
622:Delete
589:Delete
575:meets
563:addict
544:Delete
381:Delete
359:Delete
347:Delete
335:Delete
323:WP:COI
319:Delete
298:Delete
100:delete
79:Lourds
71:Lourds
46:delete
633:Help!
555:Telly
480:Keep
270:Quarl
212:Griff
117:views
109:watch
105:links
16:<
741:Keep
726:talk
704:Jcuk
696:Keep
688:Talk
532:Keep
515:Keep
310:Talk
281:Keep
221:KEEP
198:Talk
169:UBT•
113:logs
87:talk
83:edit
646:COI
627:Guy
595:or
521:.
308:→ (
165:ILL
133:. —
121:– (
732:)
728:•
686:|
649:--
504:gr
499:An
467:gr
462:An
421:gr
416:An
312:)
304:.
249:gr
244:An
200:)
167:DO
161:•C
141:gr
136:An
115:|
111:|
107:|
103:|
98:|
94:|
89:|
85:|
736:.
724:(
667:C
635:)
631:(
613:|
610:C
607:|
550:.
528:.
196:(
163:H
125:)
119:)
81:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.