289:. This one is tough. I'm guessing that Lovetone is notable, but that finding sources for this 1990s era company is going to be tough. The article has no sources, and the three external links are virtually worthless (the first is currently blank, the second is a successor company which barely mentions Lovetone, and the third page doesn't exist). Perhaps there are hard copy sources? Since references have been requested for more than two years, one could reasonably remove all the content, and start over (even assuming notability). --
247:
not having inline references is not a reason to delete. There are three web sites given as sources for this. Notability may be questioned but that is not disproven. So the nominator should give some reason why thge topic is not notable.
166:
306:. Surely the onus is on the originator/interested editors to substantiate notability, not on the nominator to prove non-notability! And total lack of references is another solid reason for deletion.
359:
First ref added: "Britain's wildest effect company" it says. Guitar Player also showed up with more than a handful of passing mentions of individual musicians using a
Lovetone box.
324:
A completely false idea. The purpose is to construct an encyclopedia, not to delete it. You are wrong here
Tomintoul. Nominators for deltion have to have a valid reason to delete.
444:, I see no reasonable cause to imagine that another week, or month, or year will help the situation any. I think at this point we can reasonably determine that this doesn't pass
266:
119:
229:
160:
214:
126:
17:
92:
87:
181:
96:
148:
486:
329:
253:
79:
40:
294:
142:
482:
424:
393:
233:
218:
57:
36:
325:
249:
138:
467:
428:
397:
368:
350:
346:
333:
315:
311:
298:
278:
257:
236:
221:
206:
202:
174:
61:
341:
The idea is to construct an encyclopaedia with accurate referenced content, not personal opinion!
290:
188:
274:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
481:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
420:
409:
389:
378:
53:
364:
449:
445:
342:
307:
198:
154:
83:
270:
113:
197:
Remains unreferenced two years after being tagged. Also question over notability
360:
412:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
381:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
75:
67:
440:
if that's all the references/notability we can come up with after
475:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
109:
105:
101:
173:
419:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
388:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
267:
list of United
Kingdom-related deletion discussions
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
489:). No further edits should be made to this page.
230:list of Business-related deletion discussions
187:
8:
265:Note: This debate has been included in the
228:Note: This debate has been included in the
213:Note: This debate has been included in the
264:
227:
215:list of Music-related deletion discussions
212:
7:
24:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
468:16:35, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
429:00:45, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
398:03:48, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
369:20:41, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
351:21:56, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
334:20:51, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
316:11:27, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
299:01:01, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
279:00:16, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
258:20:58, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
237:19:09, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
222:19:09, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
207:18:05, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
62:00:45, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
506:
478:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
48:The result was
431:
400:
281:
239:
224:
497:
480:
465:
462:
459:
456:
418:
414:
387:
383:
234:Northamerica1000
219:Northamerica1000
192:
191:
177:
129:
117:
99:
34:
505:
504:
500:
499:
498:
496:
495:
494:
493:
487:deletion review
476:
463:
460:
457:
454:
407:
376:
326:Graeme Bartlett
250:Graeme Bartlett
134:
125:
90:
74:
71:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
503:
501:
492:
491:
471:
470:
450:Andrew Lenahan
434:
433:
432:
416:
415:
404:
403:
402:
401:
385:
384:
373:
372:
371:
339:
338:
337:
336:
319:
318:
301:
283:
282:
261:
260:
241:
240:
225:
195:
194:
131:
70:
65:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
502:
490:
488:
484:
479:
473:
472:
469:
466:
451:
447:
443:
439:
436:
435:
430:
426:
422:
417:
413:
411:
406:
405:
399:
395:
391:
386:
382:
380:
375:
374:
370:
366:
362:
358:
355:
354:
353:
352:
348:
344:
335:
331:
327:
323:
322:
321:
320:
317:
313:
309:
305:
302:
300:
296:
292:
288:
285:
284:
280:
276:
272:
268:
263:
262:
259:
255:
251:
246:
243:
242:
238:
235:
231:
226:
223:
220:
216:
211:
210:
209:
208:
204:
200:
190:
186:
183:
180:
176:
172:
168:
165:
162:
159:
156:
153:
150:
147:
144:
140:
137:
136:Find sources:
132:
128:
124:
121:
115:
111:
107:
103:
98:
94:
89:
85:
81:
77:
73:
72:
69:
66:
64:
63:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
477:
474:
453:
441:
437:
408:
377:
356:
340:
303:
286:
244:
196:
184:
178:
170:
163:
157:
151:
145:
135:
122:
50:no consensus
49:
47:
31:
28:
421:Mark Arsten
390:Mark Arsten
161:free images
54:Mark Arsten
483:talk page
442:two years
343:Tomintoul
308:Tomintoul
271:• Gene93k
199:Tomintoul
37:talk page
485:or in a
410:Relisted
379:Relisted
120:View log
76:Lovetone
68:Lovetone
39:or in a
446:WP:CORP
357:Comment
304:Comment
287:Comment
167:WP refs
155:scholar
93:protect
88:history
438:Delete
139:Google
97:delete
361:AllyD
291:Larry
182:JSTOR
143:books
127:Stats
114:views
106:watch
102:links
16:<
425:talk
394:talk
365:talk
347:talk
330:talk
312:talk
295:talk
275:talk
254:talk
245:Keep
203:talk
175:FENS
149:news
110:logs
84:talk
80:edit
58:talk
461:bli
189:TWL
118:– (
464:nd
458:ar
455:St
452:-
448:.
427:)
396:)
367:)
349:)
332:)
314:)
297:)
277:)
269:.
256:)
232:.
217:.
205:)
169:)
112:|
108:|
104:|
100:|
95:|
91:|
86:|
82:|
60:)
52:.
423:(
392:(
363:(
345:(
328:(
310:(
293:(
273:(
252:(
201:(
193:)
185:·
179:·
171:·
164:·
158:·
152:·
146:·
141:(
133:(
130:)
123:·
116:)
78:(
56:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.