458:
for one of the series' games I know MobyGames is unreliable as it relies on user-submitted content, but that was the only decent description I could find. The game looks pretty awful for
December 2000. What I don't understand is that it's a fairly contemporary game series and there are almost no
169:
381:. There are no worthwhile redirect targets since no video game sources confirm the game's existence. Please ping me if more (non-English and offline) sources show in the future.
240:
163:
122:
288:
467:
but I can see why this is up for deletion if there are no sources. I don't think this is salvagable, so sadly I would support a deletion unless something comes up.
228:
129:
95:
90:
99:
502:- software (game) article of unclear notability, lacking independent references. A search turned up no significant RS coverage of this software.
82:
400:- I'm interested in Hampshire related articles but, not... this... I'm going to find some primary sources for this as this seems salvagable.
258:
17:
184:
151:
215:
246:
234:
464:
530:
145:
40:
511:
488:
449:
421:
392:
342:
320:
300:
280:
220:
64:
455:
204:. Google doesn't bring up any third-party sources, has not been mentioned in any relevant video game news outlet.
141:
438:
to show what unaffiliated sources think of the topic, not primary sources, which will, of course, always exist.
86:
191:
78:
70:
526:
36:
460:
378:
507:
338:
209:
252:
177:
157:
375:
296:
276:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
525:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
478:
411:
355:
503:
334:
316:
205:
52:. The "weak keep" opinions are weak indeed, and one of them ultimately supports deletion.
433:
369:
363:
359:
330:
55:
201:
292:
272:
116:
471:
404:
459:
sources for it. I've seen other black holes for some games on the internet but
312:
442:
385:
519:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
333:
significant coverage can be found, there is nothing to improve.
329:
Do you have a policy-based argument for keeping? Unless
265:
112:
108:
104:
176:
190:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
533:). No further edits should be made to this page.
229:list of video game-related deletion discussions
289:list of Software-related deletion discussions
8:
465:asked what happened to Lozenge and Hampshire
287:Note: This debate has been included in the
227:Note: This debate has been included in the
430:What it needs is secondary source coverage
286:
461:a search from the VG custom search engine
257:
463:finds nothing on the series. Somebody
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
263:
24:
454:I found a somewhat descriptive
251:
374:It did not have any hits in a
1:
311:-Could use some improvement.
245:
239:
376:video game reliable sources
233:
550:
512:12:48, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
489:15:52, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
450:13:52, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
343:12:50, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
65:20:20, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
422:11:27, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
393:21:56, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
321:18:24, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
301:15:47, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
281:15:47, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
221:13:36, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
522:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
354:. Article topic lacks
79:Lozenge and Hampshire
71:Lozenge and Hampshire
379:custom Google search
356:significant coverage
456:entry for MobyGames
364:independent sources
437:
373:
303:
283:
63:
541:
524:
483:
476:
447:
441:
431:
416:
409:
390:
384:
367:
270:
269:
268:
261:
255:
249:
243:
237:
226:
195:
194:
180:
132:
120:
102:
62:
60:
53:
34:
549:
548:
544:
543:
542:
540:
539:
538:
537:
531:deletion review
520:
479:
472:
443:
439:
412:
405:
386:
382:
264:
232:
137:
128:
93:
77:
74:
56:
54:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
547:
545:
536:
535:
515:
514:
496:
495:
494:
493:
492:
491:
425:
424:
395:
348:
347:
346:
345:
324:
323:
305:
304:
284:
198:
197:
134:
73:
68:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
546:
534:
532:
528:
523:
517:
516:
513:
509:
505:
501:
498:
497:
490:
487:
484:
482:
477:
475:
470:
466:
462:
457:
453:
452:
451:
448:
446:
435:
429:
428:
427:
426:
423:
420:
417:
415:
410:
408:
403:
399:
396:
394:
391:
389:
380:
377:
371:
365:
361:
357:
353:
350:
349:
344:
340:
336:
332:
328:
327:
326:
325:
322:
318:
314:
310:
307:
306:
302:
298:
294:
290:
285:
282:
278:
274:
267:
260:
254:
248:
242:
236:
230:
225:
224:
223:
222:
219:
218:
213:
212:
207:
203:
193:
189:
186:
183:
179:
175:
171:
168:
165:
162:
159:
156:
153:
150:
147:
143:
140:
139:Find sources:
135:
131:
127:
124:
118:
114:
110:
106:
101:
97:
92:
88:
84:
80:
76:
75:
72:
69:
67:
66:
61:
59:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
521:
518:
499:
485:
480:
473:
468:
444:
418:
413:
406:
401:
397:
387:
351:
308:
216:
210:
199:
187:
181:
173:
166:
160:
154:
148:
138:
125:
57:
49:
47:
31:
28:
164:free images
504:Dialectric
335:Dialectric
206:Soetermans
58:Sandstein
527:talk page
398:Weak keep
309:Weak keep
293:• Gene93k
273:• Gene93k
37:talk page
529:or in a
360:reliable
123:View log
39:or in a
170:WP refs
158:scholar
96:protect
91:history
500:Delete
352:Delete
200:Fails
142:Google
100:delete
50:delete
358:from
331:WP:RS
313:Wgolf
185:JSTOR
146:books
130:Stats
117:views
109:watch
105:links
16:<
508:talk
440:czar
383:czar
339:talk
317:talk
297:talk
277:talk
266:Talk
202:WP:N
178:FENS
152:news
113:logs
87:talk
83:edit
481:uar
474:Jag
414:uar
407:Jag
231:. (
192:TWL
121:– (
510:)
366:.
362:,
341:)
319:)
299:)
291:.
279:)
271:)
259:RS
214:/
208:.
172:)
115:|
111:|
107:|
103:|
98:|
94:|
89:|
85:|
506:(
486:☠
469:☠
445:⨹
436:)
434:?
432:(
419:☠
402:☠
388:⨹
372:)
370:?
368:(
337:(
315:(
295:(
275:(
262:·
256:·
253:S
250:·
247:B
244:·
241:N
238:·
235:G
217:C
211:T
196:)
188:·
182:·
174:·
167:·
161:·
155:·
149:·
144:(
136:(
133:)
126:·
119:)
81:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.