328:
I'd nominate it for deletion if it were kept simply because of WP:Point this time. The article consists of two sentences and no references. And no 3rd party references can be found. The original pointy behavior of the nominator doesn't invalidate the fact that other editors in good faith, discussed
78:
171:
73:
350:
260:
165:
411:
132:
105:
100:
109:
92:
281:
Can't find any 3rd party sources. Seems to be a personal project. The logix stuff mentioned on google scholar seems to be unrelated to the language.
467:
443:
426:
400:
376:
344:
318:
296:
272:
223:
57:
186:
153:
17:
217:
147:
143:
364:
193:
482:
96:
36:
367:) seems to think the article should be deleted, then it may help for you to consider it as if it were his nomination.
451:
Zero independent coverage, it seems. I can't find any, but I can't be sure none exist with a name like this, but see
458:
but it appears a different, older language than the one described in this article (Python didn't even exist then).
88:
63:
329:
and voted for the article to be removed. We shouldn't have to AfD the article again just to have the discussion.
247:
481:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
229:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
159:
235:
211:
53:
372:
268:
179:
452:
463:
306:
422:
358:
338:
290:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
456:
49:
439:
396:
368:
314:
264:
459:
418:
354:
331:
283:
259:
and I closed the discussion as a contribution by a banned user. Per the discussion
309:; there was no need to reinstate an AFD brought in what is now clearly bad faith.
126:
392:
310:
353:
discussion for an explanation of why some people disagree with you. Since
205:
79:
Articles for deletion/Logix (programming language) (2nd nomination)
475:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
253:
241:
122:
118:
114:
178:
192:
391:based on Snaphat's effective adoption of the AFD.
74:Articles for deletion/Logix (programming language)
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
485:). No further edits should be made to this page.
305:; no proponent for its deletion. Prior AFD was
349:I understand where you're coming from, but see
412:list of Computing-related deletion discussions
8:
410:Note: This debate has been included in the
263:, I am re-nominating it without preference.
409:
202:Was previously nominated by banned user
71:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
70:
24:
455:. There's a google books hit for
1:
89:Logix (programming language)
64:Logix (programming language)
502:
468:00:51, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
444:10:45, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
427:16:27, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
401:21:23, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
377:16:25, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
345:12:32, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
319:03:21, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
297:03:03, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
58:23:43, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
273:16:53, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
478:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
69:AfDs for this article:
387:Okay, count me as
44:The result was
429:
415:
493:
480:
416:
343:
341:
335:
295:
293:
287:
258:
257:
224:deleted contribs
208:
197:
196:
182:
130:
112:
34:
501:
500:
496:
495:
494:
492:
491:
490:
489:
483:deletion review
476:
339:
333:
330:
291:
285:
282:
209:
204:
203:
139:
103:
87:
84:
67:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
499:
497:
488:
487:
471:
470:
446:
431:
430:
406:
405:
404:
403:
382:
381:
380:
379:
347:
323:
322:
299:
200:
199:
136:
83:
82:
81:
76:
68:
66:
61:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
498:
486:
484:
479:
473:
472:
469:
465:
461:
457:
454:
450:
447:
445:
442:
441:
436:
433:
432:
428:
424:
420:
413:
408:
407:
402:
398:
394:
390:
386:
385:
384:
383:
378:
374:
370:
366:
363:
360:
356:
352:
348:
346:
342:
337:
336:
327:
326:
325:
324:
321:
320:
316:
312:
308:
304:
300:
298:
294:
289:
288:
280:
277:
276:
275:
274:
270:
266:
262:
255:
252:
249:
246:
243:
240:
237:
234:
231:
230:nuke contribs
228:
225:
222:
219:
216:
213:
207:
195:
191:
188:
185:
181:
177:
173:
170:
167:
164:
161:
158:
155:
152:
149:
145:
142:
141:Find sources:
137:
134:
128:
124:
120:
116:
111:
107:
102:
98:
94:
90:
86:
85:
80:
77:
75:
72:
65:
62:
60:
59:
55:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
477:
474:
448:
438:
434:
388:
361:
332:
302:
301:
284:
278:
250:
244:
238:
232:
226:
220:
214:
201:
189:
183:
175:
168:
162:
156:
150:
140:
45:
43:
31:
28:
206:Flylanguage
166:free images
50:Ron Ritzman
248:block user
242:filter log
453:WP:BURDEN
419:• Gene93k
369:causa sui
265:causa sui
254:block log
460:FuFoFuEd
365:contribs
334:snaphat
307:WP:POINT
286:snaphat
218:contribs
133:View log
389:Neutral
355:snaphat
172:WP refs
160:scholar
106:protect
101:history
449:Delete
435:Delete
279:delete
144:Google
110:delete
46:delete
437:nn. —
187:JSTOR
148:books
127:views
119:watch
115:links
16:<
464:talk
440:Ruud
423:talk
397:talk
393:TJRC
373:talk
359:talk
351:this
315:talk
311:TJRC
303:Keep
269:talk
261:here
236:logs
212:talk
180:FENS
154:news
123:logs
97:talk
93:edit
54:talk
194:TWL
131:– (
466:)
425:)
414:.
399:)
375:)
317:)
271:)
174:)
125:|
121:|
117:|
113:|
108:|
104:|
99:|
95:|
56:)
48:.
462:(
421:(
417:—
395:(
371:(
362:·
357:(
340:►
313:(
292:►
267:(
256:)
251:·
245:·
239:·
233:·
227:·
221:·
215:·
210:(
198:)
190:·
184:·
176:·
169:·
163:·
157:·
151:·
146:(
138:(
135:)
129:)
91:(
52:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.