83:. But, this one is different. I see a lot of content that was be considered non-enecylopedic and are denoted in every heading using notes that are seen upon pressing edit. Second, I remember somewhere that while Knowledge (XXG) wishes to present the world knowledge, it is not the host of indiscriminate information. I believe this article is full of nothing that adds to the value of what Viacom is or did during their existance. While an outright delete is my main goal, a redirect to this article would suffice or even just a link to a Viacom logos website.
86:
I also wish to point out that because of the Viacom vs. YouTube issue, many copies of said logos, including parodies, have been uploaded to the site. Since they are new, I have no idea if this will be a lasting impact on the logos themselves or part of some cheap and quick viral campaign.
71:
When I found this article, I began to question why this is on
Knowledge (XXG). What this is a summary of the various logos used by Viacom since their existance. This includes the "V" that was used in the 1970's and 1980's and some of the more stylized versions later on.
182:
here, on the grounds that the subject has some interest and notability for Viacom's history (so it's worth keeping around somewhere), but the article itself isn't much more than an image repository that describes the logos - and we're not an image repository.
251:: There's really no reason to have two articles about Viacom. This article could easily be absorbed by the Viacom article as a section. Viacom is notable, but it's logos are not, in my opinion, notable by themselves.--
610:
The screen also changes color, from red to green and then violet. After the word is completed, the view pulls back to reveal the phrase "A Viacom
Presentation" on a blue screen. A final note holds until the jingle's
492:. Logos are non-notable in its own right and I don't see why Viacom's logo needs an article on its own. The useful and encyclopedic content of the article can be merged with the main article.
103:
136:
462:
676:. While I do feel the logos are notable enough to have information about them on Knowledge (XXG), I don't feel the need for a separate page. --
301:
are produced indicating the logos themselves are notable and objects of independent study, deletion is compelled by
Knowledge (XXG) policy. --
474:
17:
367:
277:
329:. The only logo in the list of any notability is the 1976 logo, and even then I don't think there's enough to warrant an article.
102:, it seems the nominator themselves are struggle to express a reason for deletion. And I'll pressume they are not aware of a
139:. The scant text that does accompany each logo does little but describe what we can see already. This appears to violate
701:
641:
720:
36:
719:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
705:
680:
660:
645:
623:
600:
588:
576:
560:
548:
536:
508:
496:
478:
451:
439:
426:
382:
370:
345:
333:
317:
305:
281:
255:
237:
216:
199:
187:
169:
153:
125:
114:
93:
56:
673:
470:
434:- if there was information on what instigated the change, what it was inspired by, or something more than
421:
326:
314:
692:
677:
632:
529:
362:
273:
493:
353:
per above. I really don't think all of it needs to be kept, but some can be transferred into the main
62:
207:; subtrivia barely worth a sentence in the Viacom article, much less an entire article on its own. —
448:
233:
212:
397:. Knowledge (XXG) is an encyclopaedia not a gallery of corporate logos, let alone a publisher of
162:
394:
584:
nn, other pages for logos have also been deleted, such as
Columbia Televison, see those AFDs.
557:
466:
410:
302:
225:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
402:
195:
for reasons mentioned above, and has a bit of useful information. As previous nom., as well.
697:
637:
597:
520:
358:
342:
264:
517:
140:
313:
to Viacom. Viacom is notable, so their logo is....but it doesn't deserve it's own page.
184:
654:
And we will not have videos until the logos go out of copyright in about 50 years or so.
406:
398:
390:
298:
294:
655:
585:
574:
545:
297:
showing that this topic has been covered by independent, reliable publications. Unless
252:
229:
208:
196:
120:
88:
53:
290:
614:
330:
144:
568:
there is some valuable information here, but not enough to warrant its own article.
608:
I would like anyone voting keep to explain to me what is encyclopedic about this: "
596:. There are no independent sources for this topic. This is original research. --
165:
on the last AFD - "Boring? Yes, but I don't see that as a reason to delete it." -
689:
629:
505:
379:
111:
405:, it's logos are not (unless of course someone can find multiple, independent,
436:
on this date they changed the colour to blue, on that date the made it sharper
569:
166:
80:
263:. This article has little point - it's just a collection of logos. ---
489:
354:
248:
179:
76:
49:
713:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
143:, which requires that the text provide an encyclopedic context.
106:
when this same article was put up for deletion with a result of
48:
without prejudice for including some of this information in the
556:
with Viacom as we don't need this much articles about Viacom.
688:
I think it does serve a purpose for the encyclopedia.
119:
I knew about the first AFD, but I forgot to link it.
137:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles_for_deletion/BBC_One_logos
75:Articles on other logos do exist, such as the Nike
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
723:). No further edits should be made to this page.
504:, obvious OR. No reliable, independent sources.
224:: I'd like to add that I wish I had said what
8:
628:Because we don't have videos on here (yet).
409:of which these images are the subject). --
438:then it might be a worthwhile article.
378:as per Aplomado. if not deleted, merge.
135:per the decision on a similar article:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
79:and, similar to the Viacom article,
401:analyses of such logos. Viacom is
68:This was nominated for AFD before.
24:
1:
706:20:53, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
681:23:40, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
661:00:05, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
646:20:53, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
624:22:58, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
601:15:20, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
589:23:53, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
577:22:46, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
561:21:11, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
549:19:59, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
537:16:21, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
509:15:07, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
497:10:40, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
479:10:13, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
452:09:17, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
440:09:14, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
427:08:14, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
383:07:46, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
371:06:53, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
346:06:06, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
334:05:38, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
318:04:21, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
306:04:13, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
282:04:05, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
256:03:58, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
238:23:52, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
217:02:48, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
200:02:09, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
188:00:43, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
170:00:39, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
154:00:17, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
126:14:15, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
115:12:01, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
94:07:23, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
57:07:38, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
289:. Absolutely no evidence of
459:per reasons stated before.
740:
716:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
544:as original research.
465:comment was added by
174:I'm gonna go with a
295:independent sources
674:Philippe Beaudette
566:Merge and Redirect
351:Merge and Redirect
327:Philippe Beaudette
323:Merge and Redirect
315:Philippe Beaudette
311:Merge and Redirect
176:Merge and Redirect
163:User:Movementarian
704:
659:
644:
482:
391:Original research
280:
141:WP:NOT#REPOSITORY
124:
92:
731:
718:
700:
695:
658:
640:
635:
621:
572:
533:
526:
525:
518:WP:NOT#DIRECTORY
460:
424:
420:
416:
413:
407:reliable sources
369:
365:
299:reliable sources
293:. Absolutely no
272:
268:
151:
123:
91:
34:
739:
738:
734:
733:
732:
730:
729:
728:
727:
721:deletion review
714:
693:
633:
615:
570:
531:
523:
522:
461:—The preceding
422:
418:
414:
411:
363:
361:
266:
145:
66:
63:Logos of Viacom
44:The result was
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
737:
735:
726:
725:
709:
708:
683:
667:
666:
665:
664:
663:
656:User:Zscout370
649:
648:
603:
591:
579:
563:
558:~~Magistrand~~
551:
539:
516:Article fails
511:
499:
483:
454:
449:Ulysses Zagreb
447:per Aervanath
442:
429:
393:and pointless
385:
373:
348:
336:
320:
308:
284:
258:
242:
241:
240:
202:
190:
172:
156:
130:
129:
128:
121:User:Zscout370
89:User:Zscout370
65:
60:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
736:
724:
722:
717:
711:
710:
707:
703:
699:
696:
691:
687:
684:
682:
679:
678:Mikibacsi1124
675:
671:
668:
662:
657:
653:
652:
651:
650:
647:
643:
639:
636:
631:
627:
626:
625:
622:
620:
619:
612:
607:
604:
602:
599:
595:
592:
590:
587:
583:
580:
578:
575:
573:
567:
564:
562:
559:
555:
552:
550:
547:
543:
540:
538:
535:
534:
528:
527:
519:
515:
512:
510:
507:
503:
500:
498:
495:
491:
487:
484:
480:
476:
472:
468:
464:
458:
455:
453:
450:
446:
443:
441:
437:
433:
430:
428:
425:
417:
408:
404:
400:
396:
392:
389:
386:
384:
381:
377:
374:
372:
368:
366:
360:
356:
352:
349:
347:
344:
340:
337:
335:
332:
328:
324:
321:
319:
316:
312:
309:
307:
304:
300:
296:
292:
288:
285:
283:
279:
275:
270:
269:
267:Jacques Pirat
262:
259:
257:
254:
250:
246:
243:
239:
235:
231:
228:does below. —
227:
223:
220:
219:
218:
214:
210:
206:
203:
201:
198:
194:
191:
189:
186:
181:
177:
173:
171:
168:
164:
160:
157:
155:
152:
150:
149:
142:
138:
134:
131:
127:
122:
118:
117:
116:
113:
109:
105:
101:
98:
97:
96:
95:
90:
84:
82:
78:
73:
69:
64:
61:
59:
58:
55:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
715:
712:
685:
669:
617:
616:
609:
605:
593:
581:
565:
553:
541:
530:
521:
513:
501:
485:
467:IvanKnight69
456:
444:
435:
431:
387:
375:
350:
338:
322:
310:
303:Shirahadasha
286:
265:
260:
244:
226:Shirahadasha
221:
204:
192:
175:
158:
147:
146:
132:
107:
104:similar time
99:
85:
74:
70:
67:
45:
43:
31:
28:
611:conclusion.
598:Alan McBeth
494:Terence Ong
359:Chairman S.
343:MaNeMeBasat
341:per nom. --
291:notability
185:Dennisthe2
52:article. —
586:Booshakla
546:Inkpaduta
357:article.
253:Aervanath
230:tregoweth
209:tregoweth
197:Alex43223
193:Weak Keep
54:Doug Bell
702:contribs
642:contribs
618:Aplomado
606:Comment:
475:contribs
463:unsigned
331:Korranus
278:Contribs
148:Aplomado
415:Solomon
403:notable
222:Comment
161:as per
594:Delete
582:Delete
542:Delete
532:addict
514:Delete
506:Recury
502:Delete
490:Viacom
432:Delete
388:Delete
380:Bwithh
376:Delete
355:Viacom
339:Delete
287:Delete
261:Delete
249:Viacom
205:Delete
180:Viacom
133:Delete
112:Mathmo
77:Swoosh
50:Viacom
46:delete
686:Keep.
670:Merge
554:Merge
524:Telly
486:Merge
445:Merge
412:Islay
395:cruft
247:with
245:Merge
16:<
672:per
571:Mkdw
471:talk
457:Keep
423:talk
364:Talk
325:per
274:Talk
234:talk
213:talk
167:Halo
159:Keep
108:keep
100:Keep
81:this
698:g92
638:g92
488:to
178:to
690:Ab
630:Ab
613:"
477:)
473:•
399:OR
276::
271:-
236:)
215:)
183:--
110:?
694:e
634:e
481:.
469:(
419:|
232:(
211:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.