Knowledge (XXG)

:Articles for deletion/Lolly Badcock (2nd nomination) - Knowledge (XXG)

Source 📝

354:
decent bio-standards before where if you were nominated for the biggest awards in your industry you got in {like any other industry) but they badgered it down to the equivalent of winning the Oscar award for best actor. They get by on the loophole that porn will not get reported on in mainstream media and they can play the magazines that do report on them off as "trade magazines" even though other industries trade magazines (Billboard) are fine. Can't believe legitimate Japanese articles (porn is mainstream in Japan) are being deleted because people are searching rōmaji and can't find anything. Bias, i can't even stand porn but they are the only ones getting un-warrented mass deletions (other then criminals).
415:. "Most Outrageous Performance" is a scene award, and in any event there's no basis for claiming it's a significant category. Even more important, the UKAFTAs generally fail the "well-known"/significant standard; they were a short-lived, for-profit awards ceremony that were noted for the publicity stunts they staged to promote the ceremonies rather than any stature in the industry. Comments from one award-winner are telling: director James Bennett described the awards as "amateurish and desperate" and "staged and insignificant"; he also reported that "it seemed that all it took to win awards was a few phone calls to the right people and an advance payment for a full table at the event". 353:
Subtropical:man, don't waste your time on this mess you cannot get anywhere with these folks. They are sex-negative, if they had their way there would be no porn actors on this site. They're just "T&A/big knockers" to these folks, it's a majority female industry, so they want it gone. we had
198: 97: 284: 418:
UKAFTAs also went to videos that hadn't been released at the time they won (another sign the awards were pay-for-play) and, in at least one case, for a video that never existed (try to find
151: 264: 192: 92: 158: 244: 241: 17: 124: 119: 128: 448: 431: 407: 390: 363: 340: 331: 296: 276: 256: 233: 76: 427: 111: 213: 403: 180: 307:: what scene awards? 2007 UK Adult Film and Television Awards - Most Outrageous Female Performance is individual award. 467: 40: 423: 416: 318: 174: 399: 170: 463: 115: 36: 229:
Scene awards dont count so now fails Pornbio. A mention on 1 page of a book doesnt cut it for the GNG
309: 220: 336:
female performance is clearly related to a specific activity - which makes it a scene awrd. Thanks.
206: 107: 82: 444: 292: 272: 252: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
462:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
359: 186: 69: 378: 440: 419: 337: 288: 268: 248: 230: 145: 355: 53: 456:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
285:
list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions
377:
as no evidence of notability, Fails PORNBIO & GNG. –
141: 137: 133: 205: 422:'s 2007 award-quality performance in "Cream Bunz"!) 98:
Articles for deletion/Lolly Badcock (2nd nomination)
219: 43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 470:). No further edits should be made to this page. 8: 283:Note: This debate has been included in the 265:list of England-related deletion discussions 263:Note: This debate has been included in the 282: 262: 240:Note: This debate has been added to the 424:The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo) 90: 18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion 7: 93:Articles for deletion/Lolly Badcock 89: 24: 449:21:38, 22 September 2015 (UTC) 432:00:23, 22 September 2015 (UTC) 408:17:11, 21 September 2015 (UTC) 391:17:36, 18 September 2015 (UTC) 364:21:56, 17 September 2015 (UTC) 341:05:50, 17 September 2015 (UTC) 332:17:50, 16 September 2015 (UTC) 297:13:03, 16 September 2015 (UTC) 277:13:03, 16 September 2015 (UTC) 257:13:00, 16 September 2015 (UTC) 234:22:47, 15 September 2015 (UTC) 77:22:18, 22 September 2015 (UTC) 1: 487: 459:Please do not modify it. 439:- Fails GNG. Try Wikia. 32:Please do not modify it. 242:WikiProject Pornography 88:AfDs for this article: 398:- individual award.-- 400:Hillary Scott`love 327: 299: 279: 245:list of deletions 66: 478: 461: 388: 383: 330: 329: 328: 325: 321: 315: 314: 259: 224: 223: 209: 161: 149: 131: 74: 67: 60: 34: 486: 485: 481: 480: 479: 477: 476: 475: 474: 468:deletion review 457: 384: 379: 324: 319: 317: 312: 310: 308: 239: 166: 157: 122: 106: 103: 86: 73: 70: 59: 54: 48:The result was 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 484: 482: 473: 472: 452: 451: 434: 410: 393: 371: 370: 369: 368: 367: 366: 346: 345: 344: 343: 323: 301: 300: 280: 260: 227: 226: 163: 102: 101: 100: 95: 87: 85: 80: 71: 55: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 483: 471: 469: 465: 460: 454: 453: 450: 446: 442: 438: 435: 433: 429: 425: 421: 417: 414: 411: 409: 405: 401: 397: 394: 392: 389: 387: 382: 376: 373: 372: 365: 361: 357: 352: 351: 350: 349: 348: 347: 342: 339: 335: 334: 333: 322: 316: 306: 303: 302: 298: 294: 290: 286: 281: 278: 274: 270: 266: 261: 258: 254: 250: 246: 243: 238: 237: 236: 235: 232: 222: 218: 215: 212: 208: 204: 200: 197: 194: 191: 188: 185: 182: 179: 176: 172: 169: 168:Find sources: 164: 160: 156: 153: 147: 143: 139: 135: 130: 126: 121: 117: 113: 109: 108:Lolly Badcock 105: 104: 99: 96: 94: 91: 84: 83:Lolly Badcock 81: 79: 78: 75: 68: 65: 64: 58: 51: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 458: 455: 436: 420:Jamie Brooks 412: 395: 385: 380: 374: 304: 228: 216: 210: 202: 195: 189: 183: 177: 167: 154: 62: 61: 56: 49: 47: 31: 28: 311:Subtropical 193:free images 464:talk page 289:• Gene93k 269:• Gene93k 249:• Gene93k 37:talk page 466:or in a 152:View log 39:or in a 441:Carrite 338:Spartaz 305:Comment 231:Spartaz 199:WP refs 187:scholar 125:protect 120:history 437:Delete 413:Delete 375:Delete 356:GuzzyG 326:(en-2) 171:Google 129:delete 50:delete 381:Davey 214:JSTOR 175:books 159:Stats 146:views 138:watch 134:links 16:< 445:talk 428:talk 404:talk 396:Keep 386:2010 360:talk 320:talk 313:-man 293:talk 273:talk 253:talk 207:FENS 181:news 142:logs 116:talk 112:edit 63:warm 221:TWL 150:– ( 52:. 447:) 430:) 406:) 362:) 295:) 287:. 275:) 267:. 255:) 247:. 201:) 144:| 140:| 136:| 132:| 127:| 123:| 118:| 114:| 443:( 426:( 402:( 358:( 291:( 271:( 251:( 225:) 217:· 211:· 203:· 196:· 190:· 184:· 178:· 173:( 165:( 162:) 155:· 148:) 110:( 72:♠ 57:S

Index

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
talk page
deletion review
Swarm

22:18, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
Lolly Badcock
Articles for deletion/Lolly Badcock
Articles for deletion/Lolly Badcock (2nd nomination)
Lolly Badcock
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Stats
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.