587:
without any doubt. The sheer number of discoveries as well as cited articles, "An
Amateur Story", "Stars falling over Alabama", in addition to subject's descriptive write-up within the website of Barnard-Seyfert Astronomical Society are more than sufficient reasons for his notability and retention
272:
The Minor Planet Center merely lists his name (assuming I'm looking at the same page you are). It has no biographical information. That's the problem, other than his self-written article (re-published from a local paper by a
Nashville astronomy club), nothing can be found out about him. Unless you
343:
100 asteroids deserves a stub. His biographical data is not what makes him notable. I mean, who cares? The notability is in the achievement. This may be a case of not having an appropriate guideline for astronomers. If there is such, please ping me. --
550:
428:
508:
mostly based on the number of discoveries. I've added another reference to a newspaper interview with him, but there doesn't seem to be that many of these. There is, however, enough to write a (short) article about him. Thanks.
172:
397:
251:
492:. That's a lot of WP: links, but my point is that doesn't seem to be any non-trivial coverage of this person, just entries in lists of asteroids. Therefore they should not have an article.
250:
The Minor Planet Center is not an "independent, reliable source" in your mind? How bizarre. Should this sad deletion occur, the article should instead be preserved by being moved to
125:
297:
166:
132:
425:
Ball, Loren C. “'The
Swimmer': A Midsummer's Nightmare.” Studies in Short Fiction 24, no. 4 (1987): 433–436 (very likely by the same person)
320:- I am unable to find anything which could be defined as significant coverage in independent, reliable sources. Therefore, fails to meet
17:
98:
93:
102:
85:
187:
154:
362:
616:
40:
305:
535:
273:
know of sources that give his biographical details, I don't see how the article holds up as anything but a stub.
489:
148:
61:
593:
498:
349:
481:
597:
575:
539:
518:
500:
460:
417:
388:
353:
333:
309:
301:
288:
263:
242:
220:
144:
67:
612:
571:
561:
216:
36:
345:
531:
451:
329:
194:
514:
409:
380:
342:
I think anybio or the GNG are the wrong criteria. Certainly I think anyone who has discovered : -->
259:
235:
180:
57:
485:
208:
589:
493:
89:
477:
204:
282:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
611:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
473:
455:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
567:
557:
212:
527:
469:
321:
229:
I was unable to find significant coverage of this person in independent, reliable sources.
160:
447:
325:
510:
402:
373:
255:
230:
52:. This one is close, but there's just enough to tip it over to the 'keep' side of the
81:
73:
488:(with one possible exception that currently has an article), and Ball's article is
274:
53:
119:
526:
There are now two independent substantial references writing about him/her, so
556:
as a "substantial reference"? It's a passing mention in one sentence.
442:
as noteworthy; very few amateurs have discovered so many asteroids.
605:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
566:
I just noticed an additional reference added to the article.
398:
list of United States of
America-related deletion discussions
365:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
252:
User:Urhixidur/List of miscellaneous minor planet discoverers
490:
merely a directory of asteroids discovered by this person
115:
111:
107:
179:
371:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
193:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
619:). No further edits should be made to this page.
482:notability is not inherited from the asteroids
298:list of Astronomy-related deletion discussions
8:
396:Note: This debate has been included in the
296:Note: This debate has been included in the
395:
295:
480:. Their achievements may be unusual, but
486:none of the asteroids are notable anyway
554:, vol. 44, n° 3 (July 2004), page 178
432:, vol. 44, n° 3 (July 2004), page 178
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
564:) 21:59, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
1:
598:23:00, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
576:22:13, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
540:21:53, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
519:20:29, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
501:17:05, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
461:16:26, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
418:11:30, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
389:08:53, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
354:04:20, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
334:08:22, 29 October 2017 (UTC)
310:02:31, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
289:02:58, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
264:14:35, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
243:23:48, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
221:23:15, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
68:07:11, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
636:
608:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
588:in Knowledge (XXG).
565:
596:
549:Are you counting
548:
420:
391:
312:
302:Shawn in Montreal
627:
610:
594:(talk)(contribs)
592:
459:
416:
414:
407:
387:
385:
378:
370:
368:
366:
285:
279:
240:
238:Let's discuss it
198:
197:
183:
135:
123:
105:
64:
34:
635:
634:
630:
629:
628:
626:
625:
624:
623:
617:deletion review
606:
532:Graeme Bartlett
446:
434:(brief mention)
410:
403:
401:
392:
381:
374:
372:
361:
359:
283:
275:
236:
140:
131:
96:
80:
77:
66:
62:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
633:
631:
622:
621:
601:
600:
590:—Roman Spinner
581:
580:
579:
578:
543:
542:
521:
503:
463:
436:
435:
426:
422:
421:
369:
358:
357:
356:
337:
314:
313:
293:
292:
291:
267:
266:
245:
201:
200:
137:
76:
71:
60:
58:The Bushranger
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
632:
620:
618:
614:
609:
603:
602:
599:
595:
591:
586:
583:
582:
577:
573:
569:
563:
559:
555:
553:
547:
546:
545:
544:
541:
537:
533:
529:
525:
522:
520:
516:
512:
507:
504:
502:
499:
497:
496:
495:Modest Genius
491:
487:
483:
479:
475:
471:
467:
464:
462:
457:
453:
449:
445:
441:
438:
437:
433:
431:
427:
424:
423:
419:
415:
413:
408:
406:
399:
394:
393:
390:
386:
384:
379:
377:
367:
364:
355:
351:
347:
341:
338:
335:
331:
327:
323:
319:
316:
315:
311:
307:
303:
299:
294:
290:
286:
280:
278:
271:
270:
269:
268:
265:
261:
257:
253:
249:
246:
244:
241:
239:
234:
233:
228:
225:
224:
223:
222:
218:
214:
210:
206:
196:
192:
189:
186:
182:
178:
174:
171:
168:
165:
162:
159:
156:
153:
150:
146:
143:
142:Find sources:
138:
134:
130:
127:
121:
117:
113:
109:
104:
100:
95:
91:
87:
83:
82:Loren C. Ball
79:
78:
75:
74:Loren C. Ball
72:
70:
69:
65:
63:One ping only
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
607:
604:
584:
551:
523:
505:
494:
468:as it fails
465:
443:
439:
429:
411:
404:
382:
375:
360:
346:Dlohcierekim
339:
317:
276:
247:
237:
231:
226:
202:
190:
184:
176:
169:
163:
157:
151:
141:
128:
54:Mendoza line
49:
47:
31:
28:
568:Magnolia677
558:Magnolia677
213:Magnolia677
167:free images
448:Tom.Reding
326:Jack Frost
613:talk page
511:Mike Peel
506:Weak Keep
256:Urhixidur
209:WP:ANYBIO
37:talk page
615:or in a
530:is met.
478:WP:BASIC
363:Relisted
205:WP:BASIC
126:View log
39:or in a
552:Atlanta
474:WP:PROF
430:Atlanta
284:discuss
277:Tarl N.
173:WPÂ refs
161:scholar
99:protect
94:history
528:WP:GNG
470:WP:GNG
466:Delete
322:WP:GNG
318:Delete
232:Cullen
227:Delete
203:Fails
145:Google
103:delete
405:Night
376:Night
188:JSTOR
149:books
133:Stats
120:views
112:watch
108:links
16:<
585:Keep
572:talk
562:talk
536:talk
524:Keep
515:talk
476:and
456:dgaf
452:talk
440:Keep
412:fury
383:fury
350:talk
340:Keep
330:talk
324:. --
306:talk
260:talk
248:Keep
217:talk
207:and
181:FENS
155:news
116:logs
90:talk
86:edit
50:keep
195:TWL
124:– (
574:)
538:)
517:)
484:,
472:,
400:.
352:)
332:)
308:)
300:.
287:)
262:)
254:.
219:)
211:.
175:)
118:|
114:|
110:|
106:|
101:|
97:|
92:|
88:|
56:.
570:(
560:(
534:(
513:(
458:)
454:â‹…
450:(
444:~
348:(
336:.
328:(
304:(
281:(
258:(
215:(
199:)
191:·
185:·
177:·
170:·
164:·
158:·
152:·
147:(
139:(
136:)
129:·
122:)
84:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.