398:— due diligence is not being done when these tools are being used in this way. "Shoot them all and let the saps at AfD sort them out," is apparently the line of thinking. While I am personally sympathetic to the idea of a very high bar for so-called "Porn Bios," this blasting of 100 articles at the rate of 1 per minute, judging from the time logs, is not conducive to the spirit or practice of AfD. It is putting
258:. Redirecting non-notable articles to Listings of a subject which has been found to be non-notable is absurd. Playmate-hood, being inherently non-notable, does not prop up this article, nor can it prop up a List of playmates. Redirecting to non-notable lists only makes work for Admins who will have to delete these redirects later.
403:
sororities. The net result of these efforts was a lot of lost time by article creators and AfD participants and a lot of lost information from those articles annihilated as part of these campaigns. Meanwhile, the backlog of crap at New Pages festers. Something needs to be done about this problem. Mine is not a unique view — see
402:
ahead of the established article deletion process and is disrespectful both to the work of article creators and those of us who volunteer our time at AfD. We have seen similar automated mass annihilation efforts recently against modern
Trotskyist political organizations and against fraternities and
204:
is not an award: It's a strategic commercial decision made by
Playboy Corporation about how to better commercialize it products. Regardless of how much some Wikipedians love Playmates, we should write articles about them only when they were covered by independent third part sources. Also, texts
538:
So its a minor technicality when an editor is banned from editing BLPs in any way, and nominates a 100+ BLPs for deletion? The noms were abusive and disruptive, and there's no basis for knowing the nom was ever good in the first place, but i know many of them were not based on their
233:. Does not appear to be enough nontrivial reliably sourced content to justify an independent article. This has been the outcome of most recent AFD discussions for less prominent Playmates as well the way most recently named Playmates have been handled.
162:
584:- After some searching I can find nothing substantive written about her anywhere reliable. Far too little material to support a verifyable article which, having read, gives no hint that I've missed anything -
347:
394:- The use of automated tools for mass deletions should not be allowed against large blocks of articles which have already been patrolled at New Pages. It is, simply put, a violation of
250:
This should have been done after consensus determined
Playmate-hood's non-notability. Should sufficient sourcing and claim of notability later be found, the article can be re-started.
193:
156:
123:
299:
373:
no significant coverage, and no indication that she's known for anything other than
Playboy. (And if this !vote seems very generic, its because so is the article.)
279:
276:
96:
91:
17:
326:
230:
100:
59:
238:
83:
177:
144:
399:
508:-- the issue is not whether the nominator dotted all "i"s and crossed all "t"s (a point that in any case they cover only
606:
36:
523:
380:
505:
485:
234:
407:
at ANI. We need to keep them all as a matter of principle and ban the future use of automated tools in this way.
138:
605:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
591:
576:
548:
529:
513:
493:
438:
421:
386:
362:
338:
314:
291:
267:
242:
220:
134:
65:
429:
per
Carrite, no indication that WP:BEFORE has been followed, and many of these AfDs are not succeeding.--
87:
478:
410:
This argument will be copied-and-pasted in the debate sections for all automated AfDs of this campaign.
184:
588:
263:
170:
468:
395:
569:
417:
358:
334:
310:
287:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
504:
I would point out that both
Carrite's lengthy spiel & Milowent's endorsement of it fail
150:
404:
210:
214:
585:
259:
79:
71:
49:
405:
Knowledge (XXG):ANI#Massive_number_of_Playboy-related_AFD_nominations_by_a_single_user
564:
541:
431:
413:
354:
330:
306:
283:
117:
519:
376:
471:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
455:
The preceding unsigned comment was posted by the deletion nominator.
560:
This nomination was made in violation of a still active topic ban
599:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
443:
This is not a reason to to have a biography on Laura
Richmond.
348:
list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions
561:
113:
109:
105:
169:
476:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
209:are not the kind non-trivial coverage asked by the
183:
194:Being a Playboy playmate does not make you notable
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
609:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
346:Note: This debate has been included in the
298:Note: This debate has been included in the
300:list of People-related deletion discussions
345:
297:
275:Note: This debate has been added to the
512:), but whether the article establishes
516:-- a topic that they fail to address.
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
329:. No significant coverage found.
327:List of Playboy Playmates of 1988
231:List of Playboy Playmates of 1988
1:
211:general notability guideline
626:
363:21:13, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
339:08:35, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
315:22:49, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
292:22:49, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
268:19:11, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
243:14:46, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
221:03:38, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
602:Please do not modify it.
592:12:34, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
577:02:32, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
549:13:35, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
205:solely related to their
66:03:17, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
530:15:18, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
494:01:46, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
439:19:23, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
422:13:32, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
387:07:36, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
277:WikiProject Pornography
235:Hullaballoo Wolfowitz
198:Playmate of the Month
202:Playmate of the Year
400:WP:I DON'T LIKE IT
61:Operation Big Bear
44:The result was
574:
547:
506:WP:NOTBUREAUCRACY
496:
456:
437:
412:
365:
351:
317:
303:
280:list of deletions
218:
617:
604:
570:
567:
546:
528:
492:
490:
483:
475:
473:
454:
436:
408:
385:
352:
304:
294:
216:
188:
187:
173:
121:
103:
62:
56:
34:
625:
624:
620:
619:
618:
616:
615:
614:
613:
607:deletion review
600:
573:
565:
558:Procedural Keep
526:
517:
486:
479:
477:
466:
392:Procedural Keep
383:
374:
274:
196:. Being chosen
130:
94:
78:
75:
64:
60:
50:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
623:
621:
612:
611:
595:
594:
579:
571:
554:
553:
552:
551:
533:
532:
522:
498:
497:
474:
463:
462:
461:
460:
459:
458:
457:
447:
446:
445:
444:
424:
389:
379:
367:
366:
342:
341:
319:
318:
295:
271:
270:
245:
191:
190:
127:
80:Laura Richmond
74:
72:Laura Richmond
69:
58:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
622:
610:
608:
603:
597:
596:
593:
590:
587:
583:
580:
578:
575:
568:
562:
559:
556:
555:
550:
544:
543:
537:
536:
535:
534:
531:
527:
525:
521:
515:
514:WP:Notability
511:
510:speculatively
507:
503:
500:
499:
495:
491:
489:
484:
482:
472:
470:
465:
464:
453:
452:
451:
450:
449:
448:
442:
441:
440:
434:
433:
428:
425:
423:
419:
415:
411:
406:
401:
397:
393:
390:
388:
384:
382:
378:
372:
369:
368:
364:
360:
356:
349:
344:
343:
340:
336:
332:
328:
324:
321:
320:
316:
312:
308:
301:
296:
293:
289:
285:
281:
278:
273:
272:
269:
265:
261:
257:
255:
249:
246:
244:
240:
236:
232:
228:
225:
224:
223:
222:
219:
212:
208:
203:
199:
195:
186:
182:
179:
176:
172:
168:
164:
161:
158:
155:
152:
149:
146:
143:
140:
136:
133:
132:Find sources:
128:
125:
119:
115:
111:
107:
102:
98:
93:
89:
85:
81:
77:
76:
73:
70:
68:
67:
63:
57:
55:
54:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
601:
598:
581:
557:
540:
518:
509:
501:
487:
480:
467:
430:
426:
409:
391:
375:
370:
322:
253:
251:
247:
226:
207:playmatehood
206:
201:
197:
192:
180:
174:
166:
159:
153:
147:
141:
131:
52:
51:
45:
43:
31:
28:
157:free images
586:Peripitus
539:closes.--
396:WP:BEFORE
355:• Gene93k
307:• Gene93k
284:• Gene93k
260:Dekkappai
53:Wizardman
542:Milowent
502:Comment:
481:Baseball
469:Relisted
432:Milowent
323:Redirect
256:redirect
227:Redirect
124:View log
488:Watcher
414:Carrite
371:Delete:
331:Epbr123
215:Damiens
163:WP refs
151:scholar
97:protect
92:history
589:(Talk)
582:Delete
248:Delete
135:Google
101:delete
46:delete
566:Monty
524:Stalk
520:Hrafn
381:Stalk
377:Hrafn
178:JSTOR
139:books
118:views
110:watch
106:links
16:<
427:Keep
418:talk
359:talk
335:talk
311:talk
288:talk
264:talk
239:talk
171:FENS
145:news
114:logs
88:talk
84:edit
572:845
353:--
325:to
254:NOT
252:Do
229:to
217:.rf
200:or
185:TWL
122:– (
563:.
545:•
435:•
420:)
361:)
350:.
337:)
313:)
302:.
290:)
282:.
266:)
241:)
213:.
165:)
116:|
112:|
108:|
104:|
99:|
95:|
90:|
86:|
48:.
416:(
357:(
333:(
309:(
305:—
286:(
262:(
237:(
189:)
181:·
175:·
167:·
160:·
154:·
148:·
142:·
137:(
129:(
126:)
120:)
82:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.