158:
210:
119:
315:
152:
189:
Young actress with only minor roles - her parts aren't mentioned at all on the show pages - ie Gia
Jenkins isn't even listed as a minor or recurring character on the
278:
17:
92:
87:
96:
173:
79:
140:
352:
36:
334:
351:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
266:
237:
134:
302:. Her roles not being mentioned on some other user-edited page in a self-admitted unreliable source is not a
299:
130:
337:
290:
257:
225:
202:
61:
57:
83:
327:
286:
180:
166:
75:
67:
249:
221:
198:
193:
article. No significant coverage in independent reliable sources to prove general notability.
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
190:
53:
322:
318:
307:
303:
270:
49:
282:
146:
311:
242:
217:
194:
113:
314:
her work, such as Futon Critic mentioning her in context to her latest series.
310:
violation is of less a concern when sources DO exit that can at least
345:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
274:
211:
list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions
109:
105:
101:
165:
179:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
355:). No further edits should be made to this page.
236:lacking reliable sources, not notable as per
8:
209:Note: This debate has been included in the
208:
321:, and the lack of proper coverage fails
48:per consensus and as a poorly sourced
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
317:HOWEVER, her short career fails
269:, and also essentially violates
62:00:44, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
1:
338:22:42, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
291:20:20, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
258:16:26, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
226:16:14, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
203:16:11, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
372:
348:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
298:without prejudice per
304:criteria for deletion
279:not considered an RS
265:-- Fails to satisfy
44:The result was
228:
214:
363:
350:
330:
254:
253:
247:
246:
215:
184:
183:
169:
117:
99:
34:
371:
370:
366:
365:
364:
362:
361:
360:
359:
353:deletion review
346:
328:
251:
250:
244:
243:
191:I'm in the Band
126:
90:
74:
71:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
369:
367:
358:
357:
341:
340:
306:. A possible
293:
267:WP:ENTERTAINER
260:
238:WP:ENTERTAINER
230:
229:
187:
186:
123:
70:
65:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
368:
356:
354:
349:
343:
342:
339:
336:
335:
332:
331:
324:
320:
316:
313:
309:
305:
301:
300:WP:NotJustYet
297:
294:
292:
288:
284:
280:
276:
272:
268:
264:
261:
259:
256:
255:
248:
239:
235:
232:
231:
227:
223:
219:
212:
207:
206:
205:
204:
200:
196:
192:
182:
178:
175:
172:
168:
164:
160:
157:
154:
151:
148:
145:
142:
139:
136:
132:
129:
128:Find sources:
124:
121:
115:
111:
107:
103:
98:
94:
89:
85:
81:
77:
73:
72:
69:
66:
64:
63:
59:
55:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
347:
344:
333:
326:
295:
262:
241:
233:
188:
176:
170:
162:
155:
149:
143:
137:
127:
76:Lauran Irion
68:Lauran Irion
45:
43:
31:
28:
153:free images
54:Ron Ritzman
283:Moogwrench
329:Schmidt,
273:, since
218:The-Pope
195:The-Pope
120:View log
159:WP refs
147:scholar
93:protect
88:history
323:WP:GNG
319:WP:ENT
312:verify
308:WP:BLP
296:Delete
271:WP:BLP
263:Delete
252:(Talk)
240:. --
234:Delete
131:Google
97:delete
46:delete
174:JSTOR
135:books
114:views
106:watch
102:links
16:<
287:talk
275:IMDb
245:Luke
222:talk
199:talk
167:FENS
141:news
110:logs
84:talk
80:edit
58:talk
277:is
181:TWL
118:– (
50:BLP
325:.
289:)
281:.
224:)
216:—
213:.
201:)
161:)
112:|
108:|
104:|
100:|
95:|
91:|
86:|
82:|
60:)
52:.
285:(
220:(
197:(
185:)
177:·
171:·
163:·
156:·
150:·
144:·
138:·
133:(
125:(
122:)
116:)
78:(
56:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.