342:. It was the wrong call to not delete this article under A7 which doesn't make a credible encyclopedic claim. It's perfectly valid to seek community consensus to overturn a bad decision made by an editor who ignored A7 policy. If you want the encyclopedia to keep this article than I suggest you edit the article to meet a basic level of encyclopedic competence so A7 isn't valid. Otherwise, we don't keep articles on
299:
deletion rationale. The article still fails to make a credible encyclopedic claim in its current state and should be deleted under A7. SPEEDY is cleanup for articles that don’t meet a basic level of stub competency. Please read A7 which specifically excludes notability as a relevant issue. Yes
269:
before an AfD nom. Fagan was a student in 2016, some eight years ago. She is now a successful soprano. For example, she sang
Musetta in La bohème at Covent Garden earlier this year. A simple search of Google News turns up plenty of results. AfD is not clean-up.
509:. We either follow deletion policy or we don't. It's that simple. If editors are finding encyclopedic achievements not currently in the article text please add a sentence or two to the article so that A7 is no longer an issue.
162:
416:
and actually look at A7 policy objectively. You can't seriously be telling me that an article telling us someone went to a music school and got into a training program for opera singers is encyclopedic.
218:
119:
226:
156:
222:
66:
51:
214:
318:
Your CSD nom was declined. AfD is not for relitigating declined CSDs. Different criteria apply at AfD. You need to make a different argument.
577:
247:
450:
92:
87:
96:
46:
39:
17:
394:
policy gets used at AFD with some frequency. It's not like this is an out of the norm conversation. Not all AFDs involve just
527:
530:
177:
505:
as policy. If the current in article text remains unaltered and we close this as keep, this will be a prime candidate fro
79:
144:
456:
197:
but it was oddly declined. Being a student and in a program that trains opera singers does not make one encyclopedic.
123:
60:
56:
506:
364:
If you think it "was the wrong call to not delete this article under A7", then why have you not raised this at
449:: Seems more than just a student. There are roles in major notable productions, as well as sources like these
138:
470:
452:
335:
134:
562:
541:
518:
489:
460:
425:
407:
377:
359:
327:
309:
279:
252:
242:
206:
346:
that don't make a credible claim of encyclopedic importance no matter how many sources we find because
582:
365:
347:
412:
On a side note, the tone of the comments here is overly terse and accusatory. You might want to try
184:
537:
383:
339:
170:
549:- although I would greatly prefer that someone add the sources found and explain in context - per
558:
514:
485:
421:
403:
373:
355:
323:
305:
275:
202:
83:
35:
391:
292:
266:
231:
193:
Article makes no claim to encyclopedic importance. It should have been speedy deleted per
150:
533:
386:
process when there is a difference of opinions. That's wikipedia community policy, and
571:
550:
413:
387:
343:
296:
476:
has to do with in article text. Not what is outside the article. Please engage with
554:
510:
502:
481:
477:
473:
417:
399:
369:
351:
319:
315:
301:
289:
271:
262:
198:
194:
75:
27:
113:
395:
265:, but as a long-term editor, one would expect you to at least follow
553:. I am an opera queen, but I’m not familiar with the subject.
501:. It seems like none of the keep voters are engaging with
532:, but I'm unsure. European opera isn't in my wheelhouse.
109:
105:
101:
169:
390:is the community forum to discuss deletions. FYI
213:Note: This discussion has been included in the
382:That should be obvious. It's better to use the
338:and a subversion of both deletion policy and
183:
8:
67:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
212:
350:is not relevant under A7 which is policy.
300:notable topics can get deleted under A7.
526:: I think these are about this person
7:
24:
217:lists for the following topics:
52:Introduction to deletion process
368:? It was their call, not mine.
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
563:01:38, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
542:00:43, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
519:14:52, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
490:14:47, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
461:14:40, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
426:14:22, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
408:14:11, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
378:14:06, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
360:13:52, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
328:13:47, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
310:13:26, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
280:09:25, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
253:05:52, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
207:02:55, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
1:
42:(AfD)? Read these primers!
599:
578:AfD debates (Biographical)
124:edits since nomination
334:No. That argument is
40:Articles for deletion
366:User talk:asilvering
295:is different than a
219:Bands and musicians
471:TheJoyfulTentmaker
453:TheJoyfulTentmaker
507:WP:DELETIONREVIEW
255:
57:Guide to deletion
47:How to contribute
590:
480:policy language.
336:WP:WIKILAWYERING
250:
245:
238:
234:
215:deletion sorting
188:
187:
173:
117:
99:
37:
598:
597:
593:
592:
591:
589:
588:
587:
568:
567:
248:
243:
236:
232:
130:
90:
74:
71:
34:
31:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
596:
594:
586:
585:
580:
570:
569:
566:
565:
544:
521:
495:
494:
493:
492:
464:
463:
443:
442:
441:
440:
439:
438:
437:
436:
435:
434:
433:
432:
431:
430:
429:
428:
283:
282:
256:
191:
190:
127:
70:
69:
64:
54:
49:
32:
30:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
595:
584:
581:
579:
576:
575:
573:
564:
560:
556:
552:
548:
545:
543:
539:
535:
531:
528:
525:
522:
520:
516:
512:
508:
504:
500:
497:
496:
491:
487:
483:
479:
475:
472:
468:
467:
466:
465:
462:
458:
454:
451:
448:
445:
444:
427:
423:
419:
415:
411:
410:
409:
405:
401:
397:
393:
389:
385:
381:
380:
379:
375:
371:
367:
363:
362:
361:
357:
353:
349:
348:WP:Notability
345:
341:
337:
333:
332:
331:
330:
329:
325:
321:
317:
313:
312:
311:
307:
303:
298:
294:
291:
287:
286:
285:
284:
281:
277:
273:
268:
264:
260:
257:
254:
251:
246:
241:
240:
239:
228:
224:
220:
216:
211:
210:
209:
208:
204:
200:
196:
186:
182:
179:
176:
172:
168:
164:
161:
158:
155:
152:
149:
146:
143:
140:
136:
133:
132:Find sources:
128:
125:
121:
115:
111:
107:
103:
98:
94:
89:
85:
81:
77:
73:
72:
68:
65:
62:
58:
55:
53:
50:
48:
45:
44:
43:
41:
36:
29:
26:
19:
546:
523:
498:
446:
384:WP:CONSENSUS
340:WP:CONSENSUS
258:
235:
230:
192:
180:
174:
166:
159:
153:
147:
141:
131:
76:Lauren Fagan
33:
28:Lauren Fagan
583:AfD debates
261:Thank you,
157:free images
572:Categories
534:Oaktree b
392:WP:SPEEDY
293:WP:SPEEDY
267:WP:BEFORE
237:Quidditch
227:Australia
120:View log
61:glossary
555:Bearian
524:Comment
511:4meter4
499:Comment
482:4meter4
418:4meter4
400:4meter4
398:. Best.
370:Edwardx
352:4meter4
344:WP:BLPs
320:Edwardx
316:4meter4
302:4meter4
290:Edwardx
272:Edwardx
263:4meter4
225:, and
199:4meter4
163:WP refs
151:scholar
93:protect
88:history
38:New to
551:WP:HEY
414:WP:AGF
388:WP:AFD
297:WP:GNG
135:Google
97:delete
503:WP:A7
478:WP:A7
474:WP:A7
223:Women
195:WP:A7
178:JSTOR
139:books
114:views
106:watch
102:links
16:<
559:talk
547:Keep
538:talk
515:talk
486:talk
457:talk
447:Keep
422:talk
404:talk
396:WP:N
374:talk
356:talk
324:talk
306:talk
276:talk
259:Keep
203:talk
171:FENS
145:news
110:logs
84:talk
80:edit
185:TWL
118:– (
574::
561:)
540:)
529:,
517:)
488:)
459:)
424:)
406:)
376:)
358:)
326:)
308:)
278:)
233:WC
229:.
221:,
205:)
165:)
122:|
112:|
108:|
104:|
100:|
95:|
91:|
86:|
82:|
557:(
536:(
513:(
484:(
469:@
455:(
420:(
402:(
372:(
354:(
322:(
314:@
304:(
288:@
274:(
249:✎
244:☎
201:(
189:)
181:·
175:·
167:·
160:·
154:·
148:·
142:·
137:(
129:(
126:)
116:)
78:(
63:)
59:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.