220:
tighter. Back in 2006 when this article was created
Knowledge considered many candidates for public office who lost notable, since then we have realized that there are not the sources to create substantial meaningful articles on all such candidates. In the same way I think we have come to realize there is no good reason to have articles on all state-level beauty pageant winners. This is especially true when you consider that of the first 34 winners of Miss USA Tennessee we only have articles on two of them. One because she went on to become a notable singer/songwriter, the other because she was later one of the inagural flight attendants for Southwest Airlines and one of only 5 inaguaral ones (from 1971) still working as a flight attendant for the company in 2014, 43 years later. Even at that I have doubts if the coverage and sources on
225:
been there since their early 20s is not surprising, also it would be a much more interesting article if we were told how many original flight attendants
Southwest had, because 5 out of 10 would not be as impressive as one of 5 out of 100. I digress, back to Grissom, she has been involved in minor modeling and acting and had a minor role in a reality TV show, but none of that adds up to notability.
224:
justify having the article, Considering that through the mid-1970s the industry goal with flight attendants was young attractive females in the model of cocktail waitresses while since the image of the flight attendant has been somewhat reworked, that people in their early 60s are on the job who have
301:
I agree that we need to discuss about the notability of beauty pageant title holders including this one in more detail. I read on one of these AFD's where an editor stated just winning a US state title does not give notability. "Where is that written in stone?" Usually the state winners go on to the
219:
To begin with the previous nomination was part of a huge unruly bundle, that suffered from all huge bio nominations problems, if any of the people are notable than all will have support for keeping them. I think there is also a factor that over time the inclusion criteria of
Knowledge have gotten
587:
a couple of years back, but think it fizzled out. But it IS something that is needed - especially as every year we get a surge of promoters desperate for us to know that about 20 entrants to Miss
Arendelle have mastered the art of walking and smiling simultaneously while wearing heels.... (yeah,
302:
national pageant where there is more chance to show notability. Also many subjects have one or more other things going on that also can denote notability. Since there has been an upswing in these beauty pageant winners, I hope we can come to a consensus on what wins confer notability. Any ideas?
188:
579:. And I am sorry to see that the Fashion deletion category is once again becoming a dumping ground for women who are probably perfectly nice, but who are reduced to presenting themselves as bait for the
405:
87:
282:
the pageant. I know that an OTHERSTUFF argument doesn't really cut it, but it does seem that a reality show trumps an adult film... sigh. This isn't a !vote yet, just a discussion.
365:
182:
425:
141:
253:
385:
81:
345:
148:
303:
278:: When I see even lesser lights that are dubious for PORNBIO survive AfD, I do think we should think about giving some credit if there's more than
114:
109:
118:
614:
597:
557:
541:
510:
491:
462:
437:
417:
397:
377:
357:
308:
290:
269:
234:
64:
101:
17:
203:
170:
605:
The coverage is nowhere near enough to pass GNG. Winning a sub-national beauty pageant is not enough for notability. --
519:
471:
447:
633:
230:
40:
164:
160:
610:
629:
572:
458:
314:
36:
584:
210:
261:
245:
226:
335:
288:
196:
105:
249:
606:
506:
433:
413:
393:
373:
353:
318:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
628:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
593:
326:
322:
176:
257:
567:
To be honest, my feelings on these articles are well documented. I agree that we need a
576:
550:
534:
484:
330:
298:
283:
97:
70:
55:
502:
429:
409:
389:
369:
349:
221:
588:
sometimes we get articles on Mr Narnia, but the VAST majority is female-centred.)
135:
589:
580:
622:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
585:
an attempt to establish guidelines for beauty pageant notability
522:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
474:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
450:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
406:
list of United States of
America-related deletion discussions
131:
127:
123:
195:
88:
Articles for deletion/Lauren
Grissom (2nd nomination)
546:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
480:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
456:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
636:). No further edits should be made to this page.
366:list of Television-related deletion discussions
254:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Log/2016 July 1
426:list of Tennessee-related deletion discussions
209:
8:
424:Note: This debate has been included in the
404:Note: This debate has been included in the
386:list of Fashion-related deletion discussions
384:Note: This debate has been included in the
364:Note: This debate has been included in the
344:Note: This debate has been included in the
346:list of People-related deletion discussions
423:
403:
383:
363:
343:
501:- Run of the mill beauty contest winner.
78:
313:One possibility is to look at doing a
7:
82:Articles for deletion/Lauren Grissom
77:
24:
575:criteria, per the suggestion of
305:Fouetté rond de jambe en tournant
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
252:). I have transcluded it to
244:This AfD was not correctly
653:
615:15:46, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
598:02:27, 25 July 2016 (UTC)
558:00:28, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
542:00:28, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
511:14:49, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
492:03:20, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
317:criteria, as is done for
65:10:10, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
625:Please do not modify it.
463:00:19, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
438:12:28, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
418:12:28, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
398:12:28, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
378:12:28, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
358:12:28, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
309:04:47, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
291:04:17, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
270:18:35, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
235:18:17, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
76:AfDs for this article:
528:Relisting comment:
242:Automated comment:
560:
494:
465:
440:
420:
400:
380:
360:
272:
268:
227:John Pack Lambert
63:
644:
627:
556:
555:
553:
545:
540:
539:
537:
525:
523:
490:
489:
487:
479:
477:
475:
461:
455:
453:
451:
333:
306:
286:
264:
263:Talk to my owner
259:
240:
214:
213:
199:
151:
139:
121:
62:
60:
53:
34:
652:
651:
647:
646:
645:
643:
642:
641:
640:
634:deletion review
623:
561:
551:
549:
547:
535:
533:
531:
518:
516:
495:
485:
483:
481:
470:
468:
466:
457:
446:
444:
331:
304:
284:
267:
262:
156:
147:
112:
96:
93:
84:
74:
56:
54:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
650:
648:
639:
638:
618:
617:
600:
577:User:Montanabw
565:Leaning delete
544:
526:
515:
514:
513:
478:
467:
454:
443:
442:
441:
421:
401:
381:
361:
340:
339:
338:
337:
293:
273:
260:
217:
216:
153:
98:Lauren Grissom
92:
91:
90:
85:
80:
75:
73:
71:Lauren Grissom
68:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
649:
637:
635:
631:
626:
620:
619:
616:
612:
608:
604:
601:
599:
595:
591:
586:
582:
578:
574:
570:
566:
563:
562:
559:
554:
543:
538:
530:final relist
529:
524:
521:
512:
508:
504:
500:
497:
496:
493:
488:
476:
473:
464:
460:
459:North America
452:
449:
439:
435:
431:
427:
422:
419:
415:
411:
407:
402:
399:
395:
391:
387:
382:
379:
375:
371:
367:
362:
359:
355:
351:
347:
342:
341:
336:
334:
328:
324:
320:
316:
312:
311:
310:
307:
300:
297:
294:
292:
289:
287:
281:
277:
274:
271:
265:
258:
255:
251:
247:
243:
239:
238:
237:
236:
232:
228:
223:
212:
208:
205:
202:
198:
194:
190:
187:
184:
181:
178:
175:
172:
169:
166:
162:
159:
158:Find sources:
154:
150:
146:
143:
137:
133:
129:
125:
120:
116:
111:
107:
103:
99:
95:
94:
89:
86:
83:
79:
72:
69:
67:
66:
61:
59:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
624:
621:
607:Lemongirl942
602:
568:
564:
527:
517:
498:
469:
445:
295:
279:
275:
248:to the log (
241:
222:Sandra Force
218:
206:
200:
192:
185:
179:
173:
167:
157:
144:
57:
49:
47:
31:
28:
583:. I recall
573:WP:NPAGEANT
315:WP:NPAGEANT
246:transcluded
183:free images
319:WP:NSPORTS
58:Sandstein
630:talk page
581:male gaze
552:Music1201
536:Music1201
486:Music1201
430:• Gene93k
410:• Gene93k
390:• Gene93k
370:• Gene93k
350:• Gene93k
332:Montanabw
327:WP:NMODEL
323:WP:NACTOR
299:Montanabw
285:Montanabw
37:talk page
632:or in a
520:Relisted
472:Relisted
448:Relisted
329:, etc..
142:View log
39:or in a
571:strong
503:Carrite
296:Comment
276:Comment
266::Online
189:WP refs
177:scholar
115:protect
110:history
603:Delete
590:Mabalu
569:really
499:Delete
250:step 3
161:Google
119:delete
50:delete
204:JSTOR
165:books
149:Stats
136:views
128:watch
124:links
16:<
611:talk
594:talk
507:talk
434:talk
414:talk
394:talk
374:talk
354:talk
280:just
256:. —
231:talk
197:FENS
171:news
132:logs
106:talk
102:edit
211:TWL
140:– (
52:.
613:)
596:)
548:—
532:—
509:)
482:—
436:)
428:.
416:)
408:.
396:)
388:.
376:)
368:.
356:)
348:.
325:,
321:,
233:)
191:)
134:|
130:|
126:|
122:|
117:|
113:|
108:|
104:|
609:(
592:(
505:(
432:(
412:(
392:(
372:(
352:(
229:(
215:)
207:·
201:·
193:·
186:·
180:·
174:·
168:·
163:(
155:(
152:)
145:·
138:)
100:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.