360:
which likely explains scale. As for absolutist statements, its an unfortunate state of affairs that in Mexico the easy part of their crimes is documenting them. An independent international court (the InterAmerican Court of Human rights) issued several statements condemning the government at every level. A sad state of affairs, indeed. Regards.
211:
of the organization is mentioned in the source). If you see the video, La
Cartita is shown in a Twitter post. That's about it. This article also makes absolute statements of fact about the Mexican government slandering political groups favoring La Cartita, but yet gives no source to back this up.
359:
cites the content of the news wire's original video and shared the twitter feed, which is standard practice for videos of that nature. That means there is some minimum amount of validation on the dimension of newsworthiness. Its an emerging website from an emerging market by its own description,
168:
200:
287:
247:
162:
355:
or not. Political affiliation looks difficult to pin down. No political group is actually named so it becomes difficult to evaluate validity (let alone veracity).
121:
267:
208:
128:
395:
229:
424:
329:
17:
94:
89:
98:
183:
150:
275:
255:
81:
309:
446:
40:
369:
144:
271:
251:
61:
442:
36:
140:
427:
405:
345:
299:
279:
259:
239:
63:
386:
379:
220:
213:
85:
421:
414:
335:
176:
190:
352:
203:
will show that the notability of this organization is in question. The article is standing on a
77:
69:
295:
54:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
441:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
363:
They do have terrible SEO, I must say, which certainly clogs up the Google search. Horrid!
156:
418:
321:
375:
291:
374:
Hi, unfortunately La Carita fails to meet our notability requirements. Please see
115:
351:
There are no citations for the notion that somehow one political group favours
417:
and cannot find any other sources to satisfy notability requirements.
378:
for more details. I hope this clarifies my concern a bit more. Cheers,
356:
435:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
413:
The references advanced to support notability do not satisfy
312:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
207:
mention made by TeleSur (a video about the protests, but
111:
107:
103:
175:
318:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
288:list of Organizations-related deletion discussions
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
449:). No further edits should be made to this page.
248:list of News media-related deletion discussions
189:
8:
286:Note: This debate has been included in the
266:Note: This debate has been included in the
246:Note: This debate has been included in the
268:list of Mexico-related deletion discussions
285:
265:
245:
199:Article lacks reliable sources and a
7:
24:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
466:
300:05:01, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
280:01:47, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
260:01:47, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
240:00:29, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
438:Please do not modify it.
64:00:40, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
428:19:18, 9 May 2017 (UTC)
406:02:42, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
346:06:40, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
201:quick Google search
370:Nyc media research
404:
384:
348:
341:
302:
282:
272:Shawn in Montreal
262:
252:Shawn in Montreal
238:
218:
457:
440:
402:
400:
391:
382:
373:
343:
342:
338:
332:
327:
324:
317:
315:
313:
236:
234:
225:
216:
194:
193:
179:
131:
119:
101:
57:
34:
465:
464:
460:
459:
458:
456:
455:
454:
453:
447:deletion review
436:
396:
393:
387:
367:
349:
336:
330:
326:
322:
320:
308:
306:
230:
227:
221:
136:
127:
92:
76:
73:
55:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
463:
461:
452:
451:
431:
430:
408:
385:
316:
305:
304:
303:
283:
263:
219:
197:
196:
133:
72:
67:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
462:
450:
448:
444:
439:
433:
432:
429:
426:
423:
420:
416:
412:
409:
407:
401:
399:
392:
390:
381:
377:
371:
366:
365:
364:
361:
358:
354:
347:
344:
339:
333:
325:
314:
311:
301:
297:
293:
289:
284:
281:
277:
273:
269:
264:
261:
257:
253:
249:
244:
243:
242:
241:
235:
233:
226:
224:
215:
210:
206:
202:
192:
188:
185:
182:
178:
174:
170:
167:
164:
161:
158:
155:
152:
149:
146:
142:
139:
138:Find sources:
134:
130:
126:
123:
117:
113:
109:
105:
100:
96:
91:
87:
83:
79:
75:
74:
71:
68:
66:
65:
62:
59:
58:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
437:
434:
415:WP:CORPDEPTH
410:
397:
388:
362:
350:
319:
307:
231:
222:
204:
198:
186:
180:
172:
165:
159:
153:
147:
137:
124:
56:Juliancolton
53:
49:
47:
31:
28:
163:free images
380:ComputerJA
353:La Cartita
214:ComputerJA
209:no mention
78:La Cartita
70:La Cartita
443:talk page
425:(contrib)
419:Eggishorn
323:Anarchyte
292:• Gene93k
37:talk page
445:or in a
310:Relisted
122:View log
39:or in a
357:Telesur
169:WP refs
157:scholar
95:protect
90:history
422:(talk)
411:Delete
376:WP:ORG
205:single
141:Google
99:delete
50:delete
184:JSTOR
145:books
129:Stats
116:views
108:watch
104:links
52:. –
16:<
337:talk
331:work
296:talk
276:talk
256:talk
177:FENS
151:news
112:logs
86:talk
82:edit
191:TWL
120:– (
394:•
334:|
298:)
290:.
278:)
270:.
258:)
250:.
228:•
171:)
114:|
110:|
106:|
102:|
97:|
93:|
88:|
84:|
60:|
403:)
398:✎
389:☎
383:(
372::
368:@
340:)
328:(
294:(
274:(
254:(
237:)
232:✎
223:☎
217:(
195:)
187:·
181:·
173:·
166:·
160:·
154:·
148:·
143:(
135:(
132:)
125:·
118:)
80:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.