288:. I have rewritten the article. This is a new school and undoubtedly 'notable' events will occur over future years. Meanwhile, large schools such as this have inherent notability due to their significant place in the community and readers coming to Knowledge (XXG) can rightly expect to find an article on them.
302:
addition to my CV and a required text in a couple courses at my home
University. If, however, it becomes wildly popular and I go on the lecture circuit, both myself and the book would probably be notable enough for an article. Right now, I'm not. I guess the basic point is this: Everything, and I do mean
301:
Just because it might someday be notable doesn't mean it should have an article today. Let's have a nice for instance: I am currently working on a book with a couple colleagues about the impact of the Vice
Presidency on Presidential elections. This book will most likely be nothing more than a nice
323:
This article is now a perfectly decent stub that will be of interest to anyone coming to it for information on the school. That is a far better reason to keep the article than some abstract (and undefined) concept of notability.
276:. Whilst the article is informative, it neither asserts notability of the school, nor provides any evidence to support such a claim. Notability is not the same thing as verifiability.
117:
257:
90:
85:
94:
77:
17:
81:
333:
Completely ignoring my stunningly persuasive argument is quite a crafty tactic. Notability is neither abstract nor undefined, see
133:
128:. Excluding its rather large size, there's nothing unusual at this newly-founded school to adhere the criteria of the proposed
353:
328:
318:
292:
280:
267:
243:
220:
202:
168:
151:
59:
73:
65:
372:
48:. Despite the rewrite, the concerns of the nominator were not addressed. Inclusion isn't an indicator of notability. --
36:
371:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
195:
236:
144:
53:
129:
217:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
350:
325:
315:
289:
231:
187:
165:
139:
306:
has the potential to be notable. It doesn't get written about, however, until it actually
50:
342:
337:. In addition, hopes and dreams that someone will find an article about a non-notable
334:
211:
277:
264:
125:
111:
346:
311:
178:
161:
132:. All of the necessary information on schools in the county is already found on
365:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
210:
because what makes this different than any of these schools
107:
103:
99:
228:
The most of them assert notability, this one doesn't.
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
375:). No further edits should be made to this page.
341:school helpful isn't a Knowledge (XXG) policy.
8:
256:: This debate has been included in the
160:Completely non-notable middle school.
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
258:list of Schools-related deletions
134:Montgomery County Public Schools
1:
354:00:22, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
329:23:48, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
319:22:53, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
293:20:57, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
281:14:44, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
268:16:00, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
244:22:19, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
221:21:31, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
203:18:21, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
169:00:30, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
152:17:47, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
74:Lakelands Park Middle School
66:Lakelands Park Middle School
392:
60:05:20, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
368:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
124:PROD contested by
270:
261:
200:
383:
370:
262:
252:
241:
239:
234:
201:
198:
190:
186:
184:
149:
147:
142:
115:
97:
56:
34:
391:
390:
386:
385:
384:
382:
381:
380:
379:
373:deletion review
366:
237:
232:
230:
196:
188:
179:
177:
145:
140:
138:
88:
72:
69:
54:
44:The result was
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
389:
387:
378:
377:
362:
361:
360:
359:
358:
357:
356:
296:
295:
283:
271:
249:
248:
247:
246:
215:
214:
205:
171:
122:
121:
68:
63:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
388:
376:
374:
369:
363:
355:
352:
348:
344:
340:
336:
332:
331:
330:
327:
322:
321:
320:
317:
313:
309:
305:
300:
299:
298:
297:
294:
291:
287:
284:
282:
279:
275:
272:
269:
266:
259:
255:
251:
250:
245:
242:
240:
235:
227:
226:
225:
224:
223:
222:
219:
213:
209:
206:
204:
199:
194:
191:
185:
183:
175:
172:
170:
167:
163:
159:
156:
155:
154:
153:
150:
148:
143:
135:
131:
127:
119:
113:
109:
105:
101:
96:
92:
87:
83:
79:
75:
71:
70:
67:
64:
62:
61:
58:
57:
52:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
367:
364:
338:
307:
303:
285:
273:
253:
229:
216:
207:
192:
180:
173:
157:
137:
123:
49:
45:
43:
31:
28:
326:TerriersFan
290:TerriersFan
233:Michaelas10
208:Strong Keep
176:per Soltak
141:Michaelas10
343:Notability
304:everything
182:Kamope<
310:notable.
197:Sign Here
130:WP:SCHOOL
278:WMMartin
118:View log
265:Noroton
126:WAILONG
91:protect
86:history
347:Soltak
339:middle
312:Soltak
274:Delete
238:(Talk)
218:DVIYCR
174:Delete
162:Soltak
158:Delete
146:(Talk)
95:delete
46:delete
212:here?
181:: -->
112:views
104:watch
100:links
55:desat
16:<
351:Talk
345:is.
335:WP:N
316:Talk
286:Keep
254:Note
189:Talk
166:Talk
108:logs
82:talk
78:edit
51:Core
263:--
260:.
116:– (
349:|
314:|
308:is
164:|
136:.
110:|
106:|
102:|
98:|
93:|
89:|
84:|
80:|
193:·
120:)
114:)
76:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.