399:
I never said anything about him being the main JD, but the JD of the main criminal investigation organization. Even if he's one of 11, holding such a position should make him notable, surely? (I also fixed your formatting mess, by the way.)
173:
299:
It would help if the nominator could expand on the reasons why the references are not of good quality, because, on the face of it, there seem to be many reliable sources among them.
493:
126:
232:
167:
279:
259:
489:
488:, although this article could do with some improvements, I believe the current sources are sufficient to establish the notability of the subject. —
133:
99:
94:
363:- surely being the joint director of the main criminal investigation organization in India is enough? The article is a total mess though.
103:
86:
188:
17:
155:
245:
204:
This article does not provide enough good quality references. Most of the edits are done by editors who seems to have a
55:
149:
516:
40:
497:
476:
446:
409:
393:
372:
351:
323:
308:
291:
271:
249:
217:
68:
145:
389:
319:
213:
304:
512:
440:
405:
368:
195:
90:
36:
473:
401:
364:
181:
385:
315:
228:
209:
300:
287:
267:
241:
161:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
511:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
458:
435:
423:
333:
314:
there are good sources among them.the person is not notable and the page is poorly writtem.(
82:
74:
469:
205:
64:
345:
283:
263:
236:
120:
461:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
426:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
336:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
60:
505:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
116:
112:
108:
180:
433:
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —
468:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
343:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
233:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Log/2012 November 2
227:
This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
519:). No further edits should be made to this page.
52:with no prejudice against speedy renomination.
384:He is not the main JD but one among the 11..(
194:
8:
278:Note: This debate has been included in the
258:Note: This debate has been included in the
280:list of People-related deletion discussions
277:
260:list of India-related deletion discussions
257:
7:
24:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
208:regarding the subject matter.
1:
498:03:45, 29 November 2012 (UTC)
477:18:51, 24 November 2012 (UTC)
447:00:47, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
410:15:19, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
394:06:04, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
373:12:43, 10 November 2012 (UTC)
352:00:22, 10 November 2012 (UTC)
231:). I have transcluded it to
324:07:05, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
309:22:01, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
292:23:06, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
272:23:06, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
250:09:56, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
218:09:44, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
69:01:22, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
536:
508:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
490:Nearly Headless Nick
225:Automated comment:
479:
449:
354:
294:
274:
252:
59:
56:non-admin closure
527:
510:
467:
463:
443:
438:
432:
428:
348:
342:
338:
239:
223:
199:
198:
184:
136:
124:
106:
83:Lakshmi Narayana
75:Lakshmi Narayana
53:
48:The result was
34:
535:
534:
530:
529:
528:
526:
525:
524:
523:
517:deletion review
506:
474:Leave a message
456:
441:
436:
421:
346:
331:
237:
141:
132:
97:
81:
78:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
533:
531:
522:
521:
501:
500:
482:
481:
480:
465:
464:
453:
452:
451:
450:
430:
429:
418:
417:
416:
415:
414:
413:
412:
376:
375:
357:
356:
355:
340:
339:
328:
312:
311:
296:
295:
275:
254:
253:
202:
201:
138:
77:
72:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
532:
520:
518:
514:
509:
503:
502:
499:
495:
491:
487:
484:
483:
478:
475:
471:
466:
462:
460:
455:
454:
448:
445:
444:
439:
431:
427:
425:
420:
419:
411:
407:
403:
398:
397:
395:
391:
387:
386:Harishrawat11
383:
380:
379:
378:
377:
374:
370:
366:
362:
359:
358:
353:
350:
349:
341:
337:
335:
330:
329:
327:
325:
321:
317:
316:Harishrawat11
310:
306:
302:
298:
297:
293:
289:
285:
281:
276:
273:
269:
265:
261:
256:
255:
251:
247:
243:
240:
234:
230:
226:
222:
221:
220:
219:
215:
211:
210:Harishrawat11
207:
197:
193:
190:
187:
183:
179:
175:
172:
169:
166:
163:
160:
157:
154:
151:
147:
144:
143:Find sources:
139:
135:
131:
128:
122:
118:
114:
110:
105:
101:
96:
92:
88:
84:
80:
79:
76:
73:
71:
70:
66:
62:
57:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
507:
504:
485:
457:
434:
422:
381:
360:
344:
332:
313:
301:Phil Bridger
224:
203:
191:
185:
177:
170:
164:
158:
152:
142:
129:
50:no consensus
49:
47:
31:
28:
168:free images
513:talk page
470:gwickwire
284:• Gene93k
264:• Gene93k
37:talk page
515:or in a
459:Relisted
424:Relisted
402:Lukeno94
365:Lukeno94
334:Relisted
127:View log
39:or in a
442:polisme
382:Comment
347:MBisanz
238:Snotbot
174:WP refs
162:scholar
100:protect
95:history
229:step 3
206:WP:CoI
146:Google
104:delete
189:JSTOR
150:books
134:Stats
121:views
113:watch
109:links
16:<
486:Keep
437:Theo
406:talk
390:talk
369:talk
361:Keep
320:talk
305:talk
288:talk
268:talk
214:talk
182:FENS
156:news
117:logs
91:talk
87:edit
65:talk
248:»
235:.
196:TWL
125:– (
61:KTC
496:}
472:|
408:)
396:)
392:)
371:)
326:)
322:)
307:)
290:)
282:.
270:)
262:.
244:•
216:)
176:)
119:|
115:|
111:|
107:|
102:|
98:|
93:|
89:|
67:)
494:c
492:{
404:(
388:(
367:(
318:(
303:(
286:(
266:(
246:c
242:t
212:(
200:)
192:·
186:·
178:·
171:·
165:·
159:·
153:·
148:(
140:(
137:)
130:·
123:)
85:(
63:(
58:)
54:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.