Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/Letitia Libman - Knowledge

Source 📝

294:
speedy. To the extent that there's any (poorly written, buried lede) claim for notability in the article, it's that Libman was accused of using witchcraft to treat psychiatric patients in multiple lawsuits. While the fact that the allegations were made and the suits were filed is well-documented,
190:
violations, e.g. "On June 8, 2005, Dr. Libman has the dubious distinction of receiving the "Creme de la Weird" award in Chuck Shepherd's popular "News of the Weird" column". It mostly focuses on her criminal and media history. It is quite referenced, but my major concerns are the multiple BLP
48:. I'm likely going to get trouted for this, but between this being a borderline speedy (G10) and a arguable WP:SNOW delete, I'm calling this one done. I don't see any plausible way this AfD will close with any other result. My rationale for this SNOW/borderline 220:. If the person were notable, we could clean out the BLP violations, but as far as I can tell, she is only notable for controversy and nothing else. The article sounds like it was created by someone who has a grudge against her.-- 155: 303:
applies and is strong reason to delete the article. If the UNDUE issue were resolved, the article would have no useful content. Therefore, an uncontroversial delete. //
149: 116: 89: 84: 93: 76: 17: 170: 137: 334: 200: 355: 36: 131: 354:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
261: 35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
338: 312: 282: 265: 248: 229: 204: 127: 58: 52:
is that the BLP issues in the article are of sufficient weight to not let this sit for another five days.
80: 177: 278: 56: 72: 64: 257: 163: 243: 308: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
330: 196: 143: 300: 296: 274: 225: 53: 295:
it appears that the cases were dismissed. As the article is mostly about these cases,
211: 318: 291: 238: 187: 49: 304: 110: 326: 192: 221: 299:
is a massive problem. Libman doesn't seem notable for any other reason, so
290:. Heck, it's borderline whether or not this article would qualify for a 325:. I'm inclined to start upgrading this to a G10 speedy. It's very bad. 348:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
186:
This article on a living person is absolutely filled with
322: 106: 102: 98: 162: 321:be best? There is no neutral revision: compare to 39:). No further edits should be made to this page. 358:). No further edits should be made to this page. 256:as a mess of BLP violations and OR per Bbb23. 237:. Knowledge really isn't the place for this. 176: 8: 7: 24: 214:as well. 00:45, 30 May 2011 (UTC) 273:- more or less an attack page. 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 1: 323:the opening revision from AfC 375: 351:Please do not modify it. 339:18:16, 30 May 2011 (UTC) 317:If any speedy, wouldn't 313:15:52, 30 May 2011 (UTC) 283:14:01, 30 May 2011 (UTC) 266:07:09, 30 May 2011 (UTC) 249:03:02, 30 May 2011 (UTC) 230:02:23, 30 May 2011 (UTC) 205:00:39, 30 May 2011 (UTC) 59:16:00, 31 May 2011 (UTC) 32:Please do not modify it. 44:The result was 247: 366: 353: 241: 181: 180: 166: 114: 96: 34: 374: 373: 369: 368: 367: 365: 364: 363: 362: 356:deletion review 349: 212:BLP noticeboard 123: 87: 71: 68: 37:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 372: 370: 361: 360: 344: 343: 342: 341: 285: 268: 258:Sergeant Cribb 251: 232: 215: 210:Posted to the 184: 183: 120: 73:Letitia Libman 67: 65:Letitia Libman 62: 42: 41: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 371: 359: 357: 352: 346: 345: 340: 336: 332: 328: 324: 320: 316: 315: 314: 310: 306: 302: 298: 293: 289: 286: 284: 280: 276: 272: 269: 267: 263: 259: 255: 252: 250: 245: 240: 236: 233: 231: 227: 223: 219: 216: 213: 209: 208: 207: 206: 202: 198: 194: 189: 179: 175: 172: 169: 165: 161: 157: 154: 151: 148: 145: 142: 139: 136: 133: 129: 126: 125:Find sources: 121: 118: 112: 108: 104: 100: 95: 91: 86: 82: 78: 74: 70: 69: 66: 63: 61: 60: 57: 55: 51: 47: 40: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 350: 347: 287: 270: 253: 234: 217: 191:violations. 185: 173: 167: 159: 152: 146: 140: 134: 124: 45: 43: 31: 28: 150:free images 319:WP:CSD#G10 275:Off2riorob 54:joe decker 292:WP:CSD#A7 305:⌘macwhiz 301:WP:BLP1E 297:WP:UNDUE 239:Gamaliel 117:View log 156:WP refs 144:scholar 90:protect 85:history 327:Raymie 288:Delete 271:Delete 254:Delete 235:Delete 218:Delete 193:Raymie 188:WP:BLP 128:Google 94:delete 50:WP:IAR 46:delete 222:Bbb23 171:JSTOR 132:books 111:views 103:watch 99:links 16:< 309:talk 279:talk 262:talk 244:talk 226:talk 164:FENS 138:news 107:logs 81:talk 77:edit 178:TWL 115:– ( 337:) 333:• 311:) 281:) 264:) 228:) 203:) 199:• 158:) 109:| 105:| 101:| 97:| 92:| 88:| 83:| 79:| 335:c 331:t 329:( 307:( 277:( 260:( 246:) 242:( 224:( 201:c 197:t 195:( 182:) 174:· 168:· 160:· 153:· 147:· 141:· 135:· 130:( 122:( 119:) 113:) 75:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
deletion review
WP:IAR
joe decker

16:00, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
Letitia Libman
Letitia Libman
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL
WP:BLP
Raymie
t

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.