268:. Specialized newsletters and trade publications can be reliable sources. In particular, I note that Private Equity Analyst is published by Dow Jones & Company, Inc., better known as the publisher of the Wall Street Journal, and therefore I expect that the newsletter is as selective and careful about what it includes as a daily newspaper would be. I note that the newsletter's content is available only to subscribers. There is no requirement that a reliable source's content be available free on the web. --
441:
I wrote this page and have made substantial further edits in response to the comments above. I think everyone will agree that the page is now substantial in content and fairly balanced, with a section on competitors, etc. I also think given the references to third party articles and other sources
473:
anothermajor company. sources to show it, and t hat amounts to notability. Most of us perhaps arent too interested in the business world, but that';s not an argument for deletion.
454:. i appreciate all of the comments and do not expect to make substantial further additions and would much prefer to let other users comment and adjust the page as necessary.
135:
49:
390:
Admittedly, this reads like an advertisement for an important company; it doesn't read like an encyclopedia article. A good rewrite would justify saving this article.
244:
300:
which is clearly noted in the notability guidelines. Self-promotion and product placement are not the routes to having an encyclopaedia article. Knowledge is
210:
503:
102:
97:
106:
89:
442:
this should be considered a notable topic and worth of keeping on the site. Please see my work on similar firms in the same space
367:
354:
306:
17:
499:
451:
398:
Please refer back to the page. I have gone through and made a number of changes to address some of the items cited above.
579:
188:
36:
564:
534:
507:
484:
463:
428:
407:
380:
319:
277:
259:
234:
192:
174:
71:
578:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
495:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
93:
291:
Trivial or incidental coverage of a subject by secondary sources is not sufficient to establish notability.
152:
Trivial or incidental coverage of a subject by secondary sources is not sufficient to establish notability.
459:
403:
230:
330:
184:
143:
273:
255:
214:
85:
77:
58:
525:. There's still more work to do here, but on the whole, deletion is no longer appropriate here.
518:
455:
447:
424:
399:
226:
222:
203:
161:
which is clearly noted in the notability guidelines. Self-promotion and product placement are
150:. Has a few links but they seem to be press releases and merely trivial coverage or mentions.
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
530:
557:
359:
Self-promotion and product placement are not the routes to having an encyclopaedia article
545:
522:
443:
376:
338:
334:
315:
218:
199:
170:
147:
480:
416:
342:
269:
251:
162:
64:
52:
420:
123:
526:
284:
551:
372:
311:
166:
345:
account. Part of a larger spam campaign that seeded WP with spam articles.
475:
419:. Check the WP:Spam noticeboard for these users and domain names.
548:. References are largely press releases; no independent coverage.
355:
Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Spam#private_equity_firm_Spam_articles
572:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
521:
but all the requisite pieces are in place to establish
130:
119:
115:
111:
183:
per nom; as of right now, no evidence of notability.
294:The depth of coverage of the subject by the source
213:where I lay out the same argument for articles for
155:The depth of coverage of the subject by the source
50:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Landmark Partners
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
582:). No further edits should be made to this page.
165:the routes to having an encyclopaedia article.
245:list of Business-related deletion discussions
8:
211:See Validation of Notability AND Objectivity
225:including substantial third party sources
48:. (Similar rationale, same consensus, as
243:: This debate has been included in the
7:
517:. Although it's not as clear-cut as
452:User:Urbanrenewal/AlpInvest Partners
24:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
341:. Article was created by an
599:
485:03:57, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
464:03:52, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
429:22:41, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
408:22:34, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
381:20:16, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
329:per my nom. Article fails
320:20:27, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
278:20:13, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
260:20:13, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
235:14:52, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
193:06:38, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
175:06:33, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
494:Agree with Eastmain/DGG.
575:Please do not modify it.
198:See also my comments on
32:Please do not modify it.
565:00:41, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
535:16:04, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
508:10:03, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
450:and a work-in-progress
368:vehicle for advertising
307:vehicle for advertising
72:20:06, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
289:???? .. the others;
496:ImperfectlyInformed
215:Lexington Partners
86:Lexington Partners
78:Lexington Partners
44:The result was
563:
519:Landmark Partners
448:Landmark Partners
262:
248:
223:Landmark Partners
204:Landmark Partners
68:
590:
577:
562:
560:
554:
549:
249:
239:
133:
127:
109:
69:
66:
61:
55:
34:
598:
597:
593:
592:
591:
589:
588:
587:
586:
580:deletion review
573:
558:
552:
550:
361:. Knowledge is
285:”Verifiability”
185:Titanium Dragon
129:
100:
84:
81:
65:
59:
53:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
596:
594:
585:
584:
568:
567:
538:
537:
511:
510:
488:
487:
467:
466:
444:Coller Capital
434:
432:
431:
410:
394:
392:
391:
384:
383:
357:
347:
346:
324:
323:
322:
298:be considered.
263:
237:
219:Coller Capital
200:Coller Capital
196:
195:
159:be considered.
142:Article fails
140:
139:
80:
75:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
595:
583:
581:
576:
570:
569:
566:
561:
555:
547:
543:
540:
539:
536:
532:
528:
524:
520:
516:
513:
512:
509:
505:
501:
497:
493:
490:
489:
486:
482:
478:
477:
472:
469:
468:
465:
461:
457:
453:
449:
445:
440:
437:
436:
435:
430:
426:
422:
418:
414:
413:Speedy Delete
411:
409:
405:
401:
397:
396:
395:
389:
386:
385:
382:
378:
374:
370:
369:
364:
360:
356:
352:
349:
348:
344:
340:
336:
332:
331:WP:NOTABILITY
328:
325:
321:
317:
313:
309:
308:
303:
299:
297:
292:
288:
287:
286:
281:
280:
279:
275:
271:
267:
264:
261:
257:
253:
246:
242:
238:
236:
232:
228:
224:
220:
216:
212:
209:
208:
207:
205:
201:
194:
190:
186:
182:
179:
178:
177:
176:
172:
168:
164:
160:
158:
153:
149:
145:
144:WP:NOTABILITY
137:
132:
125:
121:
117:
113:
108:
104:
99:
95:
91:
87:
83:
82:
79:
76:
74:
73:
70:
62:
56:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
574:
571:
541:
514:
491:
474:
470:
456:Urbanrenewal
438:
433:
412:
400:Urbanrenewal
393:
387:
366:
362:
358:
350:
326:
305:
301:
295:
293:
290:
283:
282:
265:
240:
227:Urbanrenewal
197:
180:
156:
154:
151:
141:
45:
43:
31:
28:
388:Weak Delete
67:Disclaimer
544:- fails
504:contribs
351:See also
270:Eastmain
252:Eastmain
136:View log
546:WP:CORP
523:WP:CORP
439:Comment
421:Protonk
417:CSD G11
339:WP:SPAM
335:WP:CORP
148:WP:CORP
103:protect
98:history
553:Frank
542:Delete
527:B.Wind
343:WP:SPA
327:Delete
181:Delete
163:WP:NOT
131:delete
107:delete
54:Keeper
559:talk
134:) – (
124:views
116:watch
112:links
16:<
531:talk
515:Keep
500:talk
492:Keep
481:talk
471:Keep
460:talk
425:talk
415:per
404:talk
377:talk
373:Hu12
337:and
316:talk
312:Hu12
296:must
274:talk
266:Keep
256:talk
241:Note
231:talk
221:and
202:and
189:talk
171:talk
167:Hu12
157:must
120:logs
94:talk
90:edit
46:Keep
498:| {
476:DGG
371:"--
365:a "
363:NOT
310:"--
304:a "
302:NOT
247:.
63:|
57:|
556:|
533:)
506:}
502:-
483:)
462:)
446:,
427:)
406:)
379:)
353:-
333:,
318:)
276:)
258:)
233:)
217:,
206:.
191:)
173:)
146:,
122:|
118:|
114:|
110:|
105:|
101:|
96:|
92:|
60:76
529:(
479:(
458:(
423:(
402:(
375:(
314:(
272:(
254:(
250:—
229:(
187:(
169:(
138:)
128:(
126:)
88:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.