415:. I'm not certain at this moment if I would support the blanket statement that all Olympic athletes are notable. However, I certainly support the idea that being an Olympian should change the burden of proof. Instead of having to demonstrate his worthiness to include him in the WP, we should have to demonstrate his lack of worthiness to keep him out of the WP. He's an Olympian and there's no compelling reason not to include him. --
228:
all
Olympians. Participation in the Olympic Games is certainly sufficient for notability. As for the "fact that contemporary sportswriters failed to keep track of the subject's given name", please note that all Olympic Reports until 1964 similarly "failed". As for having every Olympian, please
390:
After myself proposing this for deletion I have investigated further, and replaced what must be the spurious mention of
Beaudoin in article by Lecomte, which leaves it making sense (I have also rewritten the text). The article originally made no sense, asserting nothing whatsoever about Lecomte.
269:
is. I guess I'm much in the minority here, but I do not think that merely competing in the 1900 Olympics is an accomplishment comparable to competing in the contemporary
Olympics in the 21st century, since the idea of having to qualify for one's national team was a minor aspect or nonexistent in
161:
Coming in 8th in an archery event at the
Olympics in 2004 would give a person a claim to being the 8th-best archer in the world. Coming in 8th in an archery event at the Olympics in 1900 meant that he was the 8th-best archer who happened to be at the Paris World's Fair that day. The
110:. He came eighth- in the world. This is good enough, especially for the early pioneers of the sport. A lot of people have not reached #8 in the world. Why are competitors on reality shows and bandcruft and small businesses get off so lightly??? This is written by
252:
for examples. Note that the 1960 Summer
Olympics report devoted over 200 pages to a list of every athlete participating in the Games, including their full names, dates of birth, places of birth, heights, and weights, none of which are known in the case of
257:. Furthermore, even if an athlete's full name had not been printed in the official report, his or her full name would be known if they had accomplished something of merit -- it's not as though sports historians are wondering, "I wonder who this
166:
were not contested at the same level of competition as contemporary
Olympics, as suggested by the fact that contemporary sportswriters failed to keep track of the subject's given name. Note that
148:
Merely playing Major League baseball or NFL football is sufficient to have an article. The
Olympics represent a similar level of notability for many lesser-known sports. See
230:
373:: per. Jonel. That's why I qualified my earlier delete vote - I didn't know if there was an include-all precedent like in other sports. Apparently there is... —
170:
indicates that only three countries (France, Belgium, and
Netherlands) competed in archery at that Olympics, and none of the Dutch archers' names are known.
297:
296:
because he's an
Olympian. In this world of non-notable computer programmers, launderers who have written encyclopedia articles about themselves, and
96:
as NN. An
Olympian has got to be known for something or accomplished something of note. The above seems nothing more than an obscure athlete. --
186:- In the old days the level and consistency of sport was not that great - does that mean that the forefathers of sport should be deleted?
167:
17:
149:
445:
36:
444:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
324:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
312:, Olympians are notable enough. Provided this athelete has won awards in other games and competitions. --
191:
135:
119:
163:
285:
378:
321:
316:
313:
271:
209:
187:
175:
131:
115:
83:
419:
407:
395:
382:
365:
327:
304:
288:
274:
241:
220:
194:
178:
156:
138:
122:
102:
87:
68:
52:
49:
427:: Not knowing his first name might demonstrate unworthiness! ;-) 21:57, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
205:
153:
416:
355:
238:
218:
374:
97:
79:
336:
78:: Unless including every Olympian ever is some kind of precedent I'm not aware of. —
249:. The official Olympic reports included athletes' first names well before 1964; see
404:
301:
114:, with more than 5000 edits, who has greatly expanded the Olympic coverage on WP.
392:
65:
233:. It includes every Olympian for whom we have a name from the 1896 Games. --
340:
234:
213:
111:
250:
339:
imbues more than enough notability, without anything else being necessary.
258:
254:
58:
438:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
130:- not a joke, it is referenced, and click "what links here".
300:, an Olympian is a breath of fresh air on Knowledge.
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
335:- being selected to represent your country at the
448:). No further edits should be made to this page.
261:is, who won 3 gold medals at Paris 1900?" They
231:Category:Competitors at the 1896 Summer Olympics
64:competed in 1 event, 8th place: is this a joke?
8:
204:. My first inclination was "delete," but
7:
168:Archery at the 1900 Summer Olympics
24:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
284:per good point by Blnguyen. --
150:notability, people still alive
1:
420:20:09, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
408:16:45, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
396:16:31, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
383:11:56, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
366:11:54, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
328:11:23, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
305:08:38, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
289:05:46, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
275:04:51, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
242:05:41, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
221:03:55, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
195:03:54, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
179:03:52, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
157:02:57, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
139:02:45, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
123:02:42, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
103:02:19, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
88:02:17, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
69:00:56, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
44:The result of the debate was
465:
53:00:38, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
441:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
164:1900 Summer Olympics
212:make good points.
364:
456:
443:
362:
361:
360:
354:
353:
347:
346:
345:
319:
216:
192:Have your say!!!
136:Have your say!!!
120:Have your say!!!
100:
34:
464:
463:
459:
458:
457:
455:
454:
453:
452:
446:deletion review
439:
358:
357:
356:
349:
343:
342:
341:
317:
214:
98:
62:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
462:
460:
451:
450:
433:
431:
430:
429:
428:
410:
398:
385:
368:
330:
307:
298:Rachel Clemons
291:
279:
278:
277:
272:Metropolitan90
223:
199:
198:
197:
176:Metropolitan90
159:
143:
142:
141:
105:
91:
61:
56:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
461:
449:
447:
442:
436:
435:
434:
426:
423:
422:
421:
418:
414:
411:
409:
406:
403:per Blnguyen
402:
399:
397:
394:
389:
386:
384:
380:
376:
372:
369:
367:
363:
352:
348:
338:
337:Olympic Games
334:
331:
329:
326:
323:
320:
315:
311:
308:
306:
303:
299:
295:
292:
290:
287:
283:
280:
276:
273:
268:
264:
260:
256:
251:
248:
245:
244:
243:
240:
236:
232:
227:
224:
222:
219:
217:
211:
207:
203:
200:
196:
193:
189:
185:
182:
181:
180:
177:
173:
169:
165:
160:
158:
155:
151:
147:
144:
140:
137:
133:
129:
126:
125:
124:
121:
117:
113:
109:
106:
104:
101:
99:† Ðy§ep§ion †
95:
92:
90:
89:
85:
81:
77:
73:
72:
71:
70:
67:
60:
57:
55:
54:
51:
50:Mailer Diablo
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
440:
437:
432:
424:
412:
400:
387:
370:
350:
332:
309:
293:
281:
266:
262:
246:
225:
201:
183:
171:
145:
127:
107:
93:
75:
74:
63:
45:
43:
31:
28:
206:djrobgordon
154:djrobgordon
417:Don Sowell
112:User:Jonel
375:Wknight94
286:Hansnesse
202:Weak keep
80:Wknight94
270:1900. --
210:Blnguyen
188:Blnguyen
132:Blnguyen
116:Blnguyen
425:Comment
302:Wiwaxia
255:Lecomte
247:Comment
184:Comment
128:Comment
59:Lecomte
393:Pol098
229:check
172:Delete
94:Delete
76:Delete
66:Pol098
344:Proto
325:e Ong
239:Speak
235:Jonel
215:dbtfz
16:<
413:Keep
401:Keep
388:Keep
379:talk
371:Keep
359:type
333:Keep
310:Keep
294:Keep
282:Keep
265:who
263:know
259:Ewry
226:Keep
208:and
174:. --
146:Keep
108:Keep
84:talk
46:keep
405:Avi
314:Ter
152:.--
381:)
351:||
322:nc
267:he
237:|
190:|
134:|
118:|
86:)
48:.
377:(
318:e
82:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.