294:. Google News Search came up with nothing, and a general Google search pointed to very little...even his IMDB profile has very little information. If IMDB has very little, I don't see how it can possibly qualify for an article here. (Note: I'm not using that as a standard for including in the encyclopedia, I'm just pointing out that there's very little information out there on the guy.) --
234:"Quizmania earned ITV over £1.2million during the first two weeks of transmission on ITV1." That's a quote from the article on one of his programs, which was sourced from the London Times. That's hardly trivial coverage of the program, so I don't think you can argue that it was a "very minor" show.
248:
That's about £100,000 per day, and if every viewer phoned in several times each time they watched the show, that could be about 30,000 viewers per show (each show running for a few hours), which makes it a very minor show. The
Quizmania article includes this claim about the £1.2 million but doesn't
220:. His TV presenting roles have been on very minor shows with small audiences. The main problem is that having attempted to find some, there appears to be no significant secondary coverage whatsoever, which is essential if he is to have an article here.--
186:. No assertion of notability through multiple secondary sources (or any sources cited whatsoever, for that matter). Can't be speedied since it (spuriously) survived a previous AfD, but it obviously fails to explain his importance
84:
79:
139:
74:
269:
17:
160:
stated "None notable person. Article has already been flagged for non-notability since April 2007." If deleted, I would suggest
156:. However, my opinion is secondary to consensus, which appears not to support this. Found as a PROD-nominated deletion; the
112:
107:
324:
303:
281:
258:
243:
229:
212:
195:
173:
57:
116:
203:- the article does assert importance, when it says that he was the host of a television show and a presenter on another.
342:
36:
99:
341:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
53:
320:
157:
103:
239:
208:
275:
191:
167:
95:
63:
249:
provide a source, so it can hardly be relied on. In any case, it doesn't make Baldry notable.--
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
161:
290:- certainly the person has notability, but not enough for it's own article. I'd merge into
254:
225:
49:
312:
183:
153:
316:
235:
204:
299:
187:
133:
250:
221:
291:
295:
311:
As mentioned above, clearly does not meet criteria for inclusion of
48:
Importance is asserted, but not shown through reliable sources.
335:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
272:
has been informed of this ongoing discussion. --User:Ceyockey (
148:
129:
125:
121:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
85:Articles for deletion/Lee Baldry (3rd nomination)
80:Articles for deletion/Lee Baldry (2nd nomination)
345:). No further edits should be made to this page.
164:to prevent spurious re-creation. User:Ceyockey (
8:
72:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
70:
24:
270:WikiProject Television Game Shows
75:Articles for deletion/Lee Baldry
1:
325:00:33, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
58:14:37, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
304:15:05, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
282:04:52, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
259:09:30, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
244:00:18, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
230:19:54, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
213:18:08, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
196:15:31, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
174:15:19, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
152:: In my opinion, this is a
362:
154:speedy deletion candidate
338:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
149:version brought to AFD
147:procedural nomination—
69:AfDs for this article:
284:
279:
171:
353:
340:
273:
267:
165:
137:
119:
34:
361:
360:
356:
355:
354:
352:
351:
350:
349:
343:deletion review
336:
110:
94:
91:
89:
67:
44:The result was
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
359:
357:
348:
347:
330:
328:
327:
306:
285:
265:
264:
263:
262:
261:
215:
198:
158:PROD nominator
144:
143:
90:
88:
87:
82:
77:
71:
68:
66:
61:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
358:
346:
344:
339:
333:
332:
331:
326:
322:
318:
314:
310:
307:
305:
301:
297:
293:
289:
286:
283:
278:
277:
271:
266:
260:
256:
252:
247:
246:
245:
241:
237:
233:
232:
231:
227:
223:
219:
216:
214:
210:
206:
202:
199:
197:
193:
189:
185:
181:
178:
177:
176:
175:
170:
169:
163:
159:
155:
151:
150:
141:
135:
131:
127:
123:
118:
114:
109:
105:
101:
97:
93:
92:
86:
83:
81:
78:
76:
73:
65:
62:
60:
59:
55:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
337:
334:
329:
308:
287:
274:
217:
200:
179:
166:
146:
145:
45:
43:
31:
28:
50:Pastordavid
317:Teleomatic
276:talk to me
168:talk to me
96:Lee Baldry
64:Lee Baldry
292:Quizmania
236:matt91486
205:matt91486
188:TheBilly
140:View log
162:salting
113:protect
108:history
46:Delete.
313:WP:BIO
309:Delete
268:Note:
251:Michig
222:Michig
218:Delete
184:WP:BIO
182:Fails
180:Delete
117:delete
288:Merge
134:views
126:watch
122:links
16:<
321:talk
300:talk
255:talk
240:talk
226:talk
209:talk
201:Keep
192:talk
130:logs
104:talk
100:edit
54:talk
296:Son
138:– (
323:)
302:)
280:)
257:)
242:)
228:)
211:)
194:)
172:)
132:|
128:|
124:|
120:|
115:|
111:|
106:|
102:|
56:)
319:(
315:.
298:(
253:(
238:(
224:(
207:(
190:(
142:)
136:)
98:(
52:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.