301:.) Despite the protestations of this IP contributor, previous consensus has been against including much of this content and also against creating a POV fork named "Legal challenges to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act". This appears to be an attempt to circumvent consensus by avoiding the article talk page and instead using the
435:. This page will not be eligible for deletion on grounds of the POV of its present content because that isn't a criteria for revision deletion, and the page will be NPOV if reduced to a redirect. We only delete a plausible redirect if it is positively harmful (WP:R), and I don't think the POV fork arguments above demonstrate that.
534:
and replaced by a redirect pointing towards the article from which the fork originated." This is the approach we should take here; the article should be deleted as a POV fork, which will reduce edit warring over content that has been rejected by consensus on numerous occasions. If an editor feels it
503:
The passage from POVFORK cited by Dr
Fleischman above says nothing about forks that are also plausible redirects. In that case, the relevant guideline is WP:R. Since that guideline creates a very strong presumption against the deletion of plausible redirects, and their page histories, I do not see
170:
96:
91:
100:
83:
294:
432:
331:
245:
210:
53:
164:
87:
79:
71:
391:
130:
185:
579:
548:
513:
498:
470:
444:
423:
403:
382:
347:
318:
261:
235:
65:
152:
123:
459:"As Knowledge (XXG) does not view article forking as an acceptable solution to disagreements between contributors, such forks may be merged, or nominated for deletion."
146:
411:
142:
483:
for linking to it just now. I can see how the confusion arose, and have just linked the term in the nomination. I have also linked to the other term with
192:
158:
461:
Regardless, whether the removal of the content is accomplished by reducing it to a redirect or by actual deletion is just a technicality. --
269:- This article's content, and the idea of having an article with this title, has been discussed before many, many times before by myself,
17:
544:
314:
257:
334:. Hint: Virtually any "legal challenge" to a statute enacted by the U.S. Congress would have to be a challenge based on its
598:
484:
206:
40:
466:
378:
369:
before they starting IP hopping. Based on their geolocation I also believe they have a COI concerning the
365:. This contributor has been edit warring against consensus over this content since September 2014 and was
290:
286:
282:
594:
36:
519:
454:
278:
202:
575:
540:
373:
case (which has been the primary focus of the edit warring, and which appears in this POV fork). --
310:
253:
178:
509:
493:
440:
343:
230:
61:
526:
appears to take precedence over the other. Regardless, the two guidelines are not in conflict.
480:
462:
419:
399:
374:
270:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
593:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
566:
as POV and a copyright violation (i.e. copying without attribution) and then recreate as a
302:
221:
571:
536:
306:
249:
527:
523:
505:
488:
476:
436:
339:
274:
225:
57:
415:
395:
117:
453:
The argument is not that the article is POV, but that the article is a POV fork.
295:
Talk:Constitutional challenges to the
Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
338:-- so the two articles would, in effect, be two articles on the same topic.
244:
as a POV fork. Relevant content is covered more thoroughly and neutrally in
433:
Constitutional challenges to the
Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
332:
Constitutional challenges to the
Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
246:
Constitutional challenges to the
Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
211:
Constitutional challenges to the
Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
54:
Constitutional challenges to the
Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
297:
and in edit summaries on the article page. (Especially relevant is
80:
Legal challenges to the
Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
72:
Legal challenges to the
Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
530:
says this about POV forks: "Articles created as POV forks may be
479:
for not linking to the term in the nomination. I'd like to thank
587:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
289:(one or both of these two IPs are probably same contributor as
224:
I would have pushed this one back to the contributing author.
392:
list of United States of
America-related deletion discussions
357:. POV fork as described above, relevant content discussions
213:, or a potential copy and paste of some of that article.
366:
362:
358:
330:. Needless duplication of a subject already covered in
298:
113:
109:
105:
177:
535:
necessary, they can then recreate it as a redirect. –
216:
This is a procedural nomination and I am making it a
52:. With no prejudice to the creation of a redirect to
191:
487:where there is a larger discussion of the matter.
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
601:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
410:Note: This debate has been included in the
390:Note: This debate has been included in the
431:This appears to be a plausible redirect to
409:
389:
412:list of Law-related deletion discussions
220:. Had I found the other article during
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
293:, who created this new article) on
24:
570:- very plausible search term. --
485:Knowledge (XXG):Content forking
1:
205:(not valid) as opposed to a
618:
580:04:57, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
549:18:14, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
514:09:44, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
499:09:00, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
471:08:22, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
445:07:38, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
424:14:25, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
404:14:25, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
383:17:25, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
348:04:21, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
319:02:44, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
262:02:19, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
236:13:07, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
66:19:32, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
590:Please do not modify it.
504:this as a technicality.
32:Please do not modify it.
56:, which anyone can do.
201:This appears to be a
218:neutral nomination
426:
406:
336:constitutionality
609:
592:
496:
491:
233:
228:
196:
195:
181:
133:
121:
103:
34:
617:
616:
612:
611:
610:
608:
607:
606:
605:
599:deletion review
588:
494:
489:
231:
226:
138:
129:
94:
78:
75:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
615:
613:
604:
603:
583:
582:
560:
559:
558:
557:
556:
555:
554:
553:
552:
551:
475:My apologies,
463:Dr. Fleischman
448:
447:
428:
427:
407:
386:
385:
375:Dr. Fleischman
351:
350:
324:
323:
322:
321:
291:108.11.228.250
287:173.67.162.239
283:108.11.225.129
199:
198:
135:
74:
69:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
614:
602:
600:
596:
591:
585:
584:
581:
577:
573:
569:
565:
562:
561:
550:
546:
542:
538:
533:
529:
525:
521:
517:
516:
515:
511:
507:
502:
501:
500:
497:
492:
486:
482:
478:
474:
473:
472:
468:
464:
460:
456:
452:
451:
450:
449:
446:
442:
438:
434:
430:
429:
425:
421:
417:
413:
408:
405:
401:
397:
393:
388:
387:
384:
380:
376:
372:
368:
364:
360:
356:
353:
352:
349:
345:
341:
337:
333:
329:
326:
325:
320:
316:
312:
308:
304:
300:
296:
292:
288:
284:
280:
276:
272:
268:
265:
264:
263:
259:
255:
251:
247:
243:
240:
239:
238:
237:
234:
229:
223:
219:
214:
212:
208:
204:
194:
190:
187:
184:
180:
176:
172:
169:
166:
163:
160:
157:
154:
151:
148:
144:
141:
140:Find sources:
136:
132:
128:
125:
119:
115:
111:
107:
102:
98:
93:
89:
85:
81:
77:
76:
73:
70:
68:
67:
63:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
589:
586:
567:
563:
531:
481:DrFleischman
458:
370:
354:
335:
327:
271:DrFleischman
266:
241:
217:
215:
207:Content Fork
200:
188:
182:
174:
167:
161:
155:
149:
139:
126:
49:
47:
31:
28:
209:(valid) of
165:free images
520:WP:POVFORK
455:WP:POVFORK
305:process. –
595:talk page
572:ThaddeusB
537:Prototime
416:• Gene93k
396:• Gene93k
307:Prototime
279:Jkaganoff
250:Prototime
37:talk page
597:or in a
568:Redirect
545:contribs
518:Neither
506:James500
477:James500
437:James500
340:Famspear
315:contribs
275:Famspear
258:contribs
203:POV Fork
124:View log
58:Davewild
39:or in a
532:deleted
367:blocked
267:Comment
171:WP refs
159:scholar
97:protect
92:history
564:Delete
495:Faddle
490:Fiddle
371:Cutler
355:Delete
328:Delete
303:WP:AFC
285:, and
242:Delete
232:Faddle
227:Fiddle
222:WP:AFC
143:Google
101:delete
50:delete
186:JSTOR
147:books
131:Stats
118:views
110:watch
106:links
16:<
576:talk
541:talk
528:WP:R
524:WP:R
510:talk
467:talk
441:talk
420:talk
400:talk
379:talk
363:here
359:here
344:talk
311:talk
299:this
254:talk
179:FENS
153:news
114:logs
88:talk
84:edit
62:talk
522:or
248:. –
193:TWL
122:– (
578:)
547:)
543:·
512:)
469:)
457::
443:)
422:)
414:.
402:)
394:.
381:)
361:,
346:)
317:)
313:·
281:,
277:,
273:,
260:)
256:·
173:)
116:|
112:|
108:|
104:|
99:|
95:|
90:|
86:|
64:)
574:(
539:(
508:(
465:(
439:(
418:(
398:(
377:(
342:(
309:(
252:(
197:)
189:·
183:·
175:·
168:·
162:·
156:·
150:·
145:(
137:(
134:)
127:·
120:)
82:(
60:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.