512:
I do not really see much real notability, but ther eare some usable references for the company, so it qualifies under the present general notability criterion. I think this is another case showing the inapplicability of such a criterion, but some people still think it's policy.
157:
Reply: I disagree with your assessment that this article should be deleted. It is not an advertisement and there are several external sources backing up the information for this article which are linked at the bottom.
210:
only one of the references meets reliability criteria (of the other two one is a self-published blog and the other just a press release) and there is nothing that actually shows the compamy is notable.
536:, but as a Indiana resident I can confirm that this company has received ample coverage in secondary sources to support notability per the general notability guideline, which trumps WP:WEB.
465:- I reviewed their site, company seems notable but their article was not written nor referenced as per policy. They need to expend effort to fix it, advetorials do not belong in dictionary.
289:
I live in the area where this company is based and they are pretty notable. I don't see why the article can stay if he fixes the reference problems, which appears to be the case.
390:
132:
248:
Entry has been updated with more notable sources. Disagree with the assessment that this company is not 'notable.' It's a large employer in the
Chicagoland area.
435:
263:
174:
62:
418:- Removed 'flagged for deletion box' and 'advert box.' Consensus was that page will stay, meets notability and reference requirements.
17:
99:
94:
103:
369:
Actually no. The references are 1) a possibly reasonable news story from a legit news outlet 2) a press release 3) a blog.
86:
571:
36:
431:
350:-Agree that the article tastes slightly like spam, but the references are trade journals and legit news outlets.
259:
170:
570:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
57:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
312:- note that the above is the only contribution so far by this user. Assuming good faith but possible SPA. –
423:
295:
251:
162:
427:
255:
166:
496:
403:
553:
524:
501:
474:
455:
408:
378:
359:
342:
321:
299:
281:
237:
220:
202:
151:
68:
90:
374:
216:
290:
470:
52:
49:
82:
74:
451:
355:
338:
317:
277:
233:
198:
147:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
333:- Article is practically an advertising piece, but they do seem to (barely) meet notability.
190:
549:
490:
397:
533:
545:
370:
212:
186:
466:
520:
447:
351:
334:
313:
273:
269:
229:
194:
143:
120:
484:
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
532:
Article requires clean up and better sourcing, and may not meet requirments of
538:
515:
446:
Removed purported closure as keep by main contributor to article
564:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
272:- you should only make one delete/keep statement) –
228:
per nomination, was a borderline speedy candidate IMHO
127:
116:
112:
108:
489:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
142:promotional article with no evidence of notability
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
574:). No further edits should be made to this page.
391:list of Advertising-related deletion discussions
8:
389:: This debate has been included in the
193:, not blogs and self-published stuff.
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
1:
591:
266:) 16:41, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
554:02:23, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
525:06:13, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
502:22:50, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
475:05:13, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
379:10:40, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
268:(changed to "comment" by
185:Knowledge (XXG) requires
69:04:14, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
567:Please do not modify it.
456:15:36, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
409:22:32, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
360:19:35, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
343:18:17, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
322:17:27, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
300:16:52, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
282:17:27, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
238:16:29, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
221:15:49, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
203:15:48, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
152:15:19, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
44:The result was
552:
504:
440:
426:comment added by
411:
394:
302:
267:
254:comment added by
179:
165:comment added by
582:
569:
544:
541:
499:
493:
488:
486:
439:
428:Jonathanwthomas
420:
406:
400:
395:
385:
293:
249:
187:reliable sources
178:
167:Jonathanwthomas
159:
130:
124:
106:
65:
60:
55:
34:
590:
589:
585:
584:
583:
581:
580:
579:
578:
572:deletion review
565:
539:
497:
491:
482:
421:
404:
398:
256:Jonathanwthomas
160:
126:
97:
81:
78:
63:
58:
53:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
588:
586:
577:
576:
559:
557:
556:
527:
506:
505:
487:
479:
478:
477:
460:
459:
458:
412:
382:
381:
363:
362:
345:
327:
326:
325:
324:
304:
303:
284:
240:
223:
205:
180:
137:
136:
77:
72:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
587:
575:
573:
568:
562:
561:
560:
555:
551:
547:
543:
542:
535:
531:
528:
526:
522:
518:
517:
511:
508:
507:
503:
500:
494:
485:
481:
480:
476:
472:
468:
464:
461:
457:
453:
449:
445:
442:
441:
437:
433:
429:
425:
419:
417:
413:
410:
407:
401:
392:
388:
384:
383:
380:
376:
372:
368:
365:
364:
361:
357:
353:
349:
346:
344:
340:
336:
332:
329:
328:
323:
319:
315:
311:
308:
307:
306:
305:
301:
298:was added at
297:
292:
288:
285:
283:
279:
275:
271:
265:
261:
257:
253:
247:
245:
244:Do Not Delete
241:
239:
235:
231:
227:
224:
222:
218:
214:
209:
206:
204:
200:
196:
192:
188:
184:
181:
176:
172:
168:
164:
156:
155:
154:
153:
149:
145:
141:
134:
129:
122:
118:
114:
110:
105:
101:
96:
92:
88:
84:
80:
79:
76:
73:
71:
70:
66:
61:
56:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
566:
563:
558:
537:
529:
514:
509:
483:
462:
443:
422:— Preceding
415:
414:
386:
366:
347:
330:
309:
294:— Preceding
286:
250:— Preceding
243:
242:
225:
207:
182:
161:— Preceding
139:
138:
45:
43:
31:
28:
492:Fabrictramp
399:Fabrictramp
208:Weak Delete
189:that prove
83:Livemercial
75:Livemercial
550:count/logs
498:talk to me
405:talk to me
371:Jasynnash2
213:Jasynnash2
191:notability
510:weak Keep
467:DustyRain
463:Weak Keep
331:Weak Keep
436:contribs
424:unsigned
291:duneblog
264:contribs
252:unsigned
175:contribs
163:unsigned
133:View log
448:Mayalld
444:Comment
416:Keeping
367:Comment
352:Livitup
335:Rasadam
314:ukexpat
310:Comment
296:comment
287:Notable
274:ukexpat
270:ukexpat
246:Comment
230:ukexpat
195:Mayalld
183:Comment
144:Mayalld
100:protect
95:history
50:King of
534:WP:WEB
226:Delete
140:Delete
128:delete
104:delete
540:Jerry
131:) – (
121:views
113:watch
109:links
16:<
546:talk
530:Keep
521:talk
471:talk
452:talk
432:talk
387:Note
375:talk
356:talk
348:Keep
339:talk
318:talk
278:talk
260:talk
234:talk
217:talk
199:talk
171:talk
148:talk
117:logs
91:talk
87:edit
46:keep
516:DGG
396:--
548:¤
523:)
495:|
473:)
454:)
438:)
434:•
402:|
393:.
377:)
358:)
341:)
320:)
280:)
262:•
236:)
219:)
201:)
177:)
173:•
150:)
119:|
115:|
111:|
107:|
102:|
98:|
93:|
89:|
67:♠
48:.
519:(
469:(
450:(
430:(
373:(
354:(
337:(
316:(
276:(
258:(
232:(
215:(
197:(
169:(
146:(
135:)
125:(
123:)
85:(
64:♣
59:♦
54:♥
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.